issue36 (4天没写了，什么时候才能从量变到质变啊）

逗逗UID: 173558

36"The greatness of individuals can be decided only by those who live after them, not by their contemporaries."
1 由于同代人理解能力的局限,一些伟人可能需要后代人认可,主要是科学领域.
2在特定的历史背景下,一些作品可能无法公布,直到后来才被人认可,而另一些处于宽松  言论环境下的作者则很快得到承认.
3特殊的历史事件使一些伟人得到了当代人立即的承认.
Do the greatness of individuals should be appreciated only by the future generation rather than their peers? In my view, the answer is closely associated with specific situations. In some cases, achievements of people do need a long time for recognition, while in others, they are likely to be realized by their contemporaries.

Since prominent people are far more talented than their peers, novel ideas or discoveries raised by them may beyond the understanding of their contemporaries, thus not be widely accepted. This situation has frequently happened in the realm of science. For one hand, due to the limitation of scientific development, most people are confined to existed theories and lack sufficient recognition for creative ideas that surpass average level of current study. Therefore, once a new idea is emerged, it will inevitably incur challenges by researchers form the same field. Especially when a new view contradicts the acknowledged system, the one who build it may be treated as "crazy" and this view as" eccentric". For the other hand, as continuous reexamination for previous theories accounts for a large part in the improvement of science, it requires a relatively long time to substantiate novel ideas. Barbara McClintock, for example, when firstly put forward the theory of transposon in 1951, had confronted with numerous attacks form his counterparts. Being deeply influenced by the theory of classic genetics, her coeval scientists can never imagine genes that "dance" from one genome to another. In spite of disapproval from her peers, McClintock stuck to her original research. 32years later, this discovery was considered as a key contribution in genetics by the next generation, and she was granted the Nobel Prize of biology at the same time. Even in today, most famous scientists still encounter a lot of questions from others and constantly revise their own theories. Maybe their feats can only be decided by future generations,

Additionally, realization of one's achievement is confined to certain historical and political background. In fact, the greatness of individuals, especially in literature, can never be recognized without their works being known by a large amount of people. One obtrusive instance is the well-known novel <<The Story of The Stone>> written by CaoXueqing , Which Was Listed as forbidden book by the ruler in Qing period, for it include a lot of negative viewpoints against Feudalism. Because of this regulation, few had read this novel, let alone to appreciated its social and literary value. Until several decades later, it was recognized as the highest accomplishment in China's literary history. On the contrary, once in a democratic nation which permit latitude, authors are able to present their works freely.Cervantes, writer of the satire novel <<Don Quixote >> which attacked the harmful atmosphere of idealism among aristocrats and feudalists in that era, quickly became the best selling, Cervantes was also honored as excellent writer by his peers. To some extent, the themes of the two novels are similar, yet, the time asked for recognition are totally different.

Nevertheless, the importance of people can be praised immediately owing to particular history events. Since they often play a vital role in change severe situations , their contribution are hardly  ignorant by their peers. Abraham Lincoln, the 16th presidents in America, who had led the Civil War, was widely supported by citizens in his time; Franklin Roosevelt, who successfully reverse declining economy by adopting new Deal in America during 1930s, was acclaimed by the populace; Martin Luther King, the leader of the movement for civil rights, was highly admired by the black. Obviously, specific events create opportunities for their quick acceptance .

In sum, without commensurate vision about new things, their peers may not recognize the attainment of scientists; without relatively free political atmosphere, the authors may get no access to the realization; without appropriate chance, the greatness of individual may not be revealed to the public. Hence, whether the contributions of individuals are acknowledged by their contemporaries or those who live after them largely depend on certain circumstance.

[ Last edited by staralways on 2005-6-21 at 00:18 ]

conquer0824UID: 2102638

Do the greatness of individuals should(不应该是should问题吧，应该是could的问题） be appreciated only by the future generation rather than their peers? In my view, the answer is closely associated with specific situations. In some cases, achievements of people do need a long time for recognition, while in others, they are likely to be realized by their contemporaries.

Since prominent people are far more talented than their peers, novel ideas or discoveries raised by them may （go？没有谓语） beyond the understanding of their contemporaries, thus can？ not be widely accepted. This situation has frequently happened in the realm of science. For（on?有这种说法吗？for one hand) one hand, due to the limitation of scientific development, most people are confined to existed theories and lack sufficient recognition for creative ideas that surpass average level of current study. Therefore, once a new idea is emerged, it will inevitably incur challenges by researchers form the same field. Especially when a new view contradicts the acknowledged system, the one who build it may be treated as "crazy" and this view as" eccentric". For(on) the other hand, as continuous reexamination for previous theories accounts for a large part in the improvement of science, it requires a relatively long time to substantiate novel ideas. Barbara McClintock(楼主给我提供的例子啊，今天作填空还看到这个人了呢）, for example, when firstly put forward the theory of transposon in 1951, had confronted with numerous attacks form his counterparts. Being deeply influenced by the theory of classic genetics, her coeval scientists can never imagine genes that "dance" from one genome to another. In spite of disapproval from her peers, McClintock stuck to her original research. 32years later, this discovery was considered as a key contribution in genetics by the next generation, and she was granted the Nobel Prize of biology at the same time. Even in today, most famous scientists still encounter a lot of questions from others and constantly revise their own theories. Maybe their feats can only be decided by future generations,

Additionally, realization（改为ing形势好一些吧？后者改称realizing that的结构，感觉会好一些） of one's achievement is confined to certain historical and political background. In fact, the greatness of individuals, especially in literature, can never be recognized without their works being known by a large amount of people. One obtrusive instance is the well-known novel <<The Story of The Stone不是石头记吧，英文名字应该叫the dream of red mansion,在确认一下，而且英文没有书名号吧，讨论，不确定 >> written by CaoXueqing , Which Was Listed as forbidden book by the ruler in Qing period, for it included a lot of negative viewpoints against Feudalism. Because of this regulation, few had read this novel, let alone to(去掉） appreciated its social and literary value. Until several decades later, it was recognized as the highest accomplishment in China's literary history. On the contrary, once in a democratic nation which permit latitude, authors are able to present their works freely.Cervantes, writer of the satire novel <<Don Quixote （书名号很刺眼)>> which attacked the harmful atmosphere of idealism among aristocrats and feudalists in that era, quickly became the best seller (畅销书）, Cervantes was also honored as excellent writer by his peers. To some extent, the themes of the two novels are similar, yet, the time asked for recognition are totally different.

Nevertheless, the importance of people can be praised immediately owing to particular history events. Since they often play a vital role in changingsevere situations , their contribution are hardly  ignorant by their peers. Abraham Lincoln, the 16th presidents in America, who had led the Civil War, was widely supported by citizens in his time; Franklin Roosevelt, who successfully reverse declining economy by adopting new Deal in America during 1930s, was acclaimed by the populace; Martin Luther King, the leader of the movement for civil rights, was highly admired by the black. Obviously, specific events create opportunities for their quick acceptance (简要概括排比离子不错）.
In sum, without commensurate vision about new things, their peers may not recognize the attainment of scientists; without relatively free political atmosphere, the authors may get no access to the realization; without appropriate chance, the greatness of individual may not be revealed to the public(排比用得不错）. Hence, whether the contributions of individuals are acknowledged by their contemporaries or those who live after them largely depend on certain circumstance.

写得不错，条理性比较好，继续努力

逗逗UID: 173558

好快啊谢谢conquer0824 几天没有写手生了 文章有点头重脚轻,郁闷啊

conquer0824UID: 2102638

偶也时，觉得改作文比写作文轻松多了，不想歇，看哪道题都没有思路，虽然提不出什么实质性的意见，见谅

so猫改作文还是很好的啊，受益匪浅。不过一星期只能改一篇，下礼拜再让她给偶改，希望下篇文章能好一些

[ Last edited by conquer0824 on 2005-6-21 at 00:00 ]

leo_chenUID: 206840

36"The greatness of individuals can be decided only by those who live after them, not by their contemporaries."
1 由于同代人理解能力的局限,一些伟人可能需要后代人认可,主要是科学领域.
2在特定的历史背景下,一些作品可能无法公布,直到后来才被人认可,而另一些处于宽松  言论环境下的作者则很快得到承认.
3特殊的历史事件使一些伟人得到了当代人立即的承认.
Do the greatness of individuals should be appreciated only by the future generation rather than their peers? In my view, the answer is closely associated with specific situations. In some cases, achievements of people do need a long time for recognition, while in others, they are likely to be realized by their contemporaries.

Since prominent people are far more talented than their peers, novel ideas or discoveries raised by them may beyond the understanding of their contemporaries, thus not be widely accepted. This situation has frequently happened in the realm of science. For one hand, due to the limitation of scientific development, most people are confined to existed theories and lack sufficient recognition for creative ideas that surpass average level of current study. Therefore, once a new idea is emerged, it will inevitably incur challenges by researchers form the same field. Especially when a new view contradicts the acknowledged system, the one who build it may be treated as "crazy" and this view as" eccentric". For the other hand, as continuous reexamination for previous theories accounts for a large part in the improvement of science, it requires a relatively long time to substantiate novel ideas. Barbara McClintock, for example, when firstly put forward the theory of transposon in 1951, had confronted with numerous attacks form his counterparts. Being deeply influenced by the theory of classic genetics, her coeval scientists can never imagine genes that "dance" from one genome to another. In spite of disapproval from her peers, McClintock stuck to her original research. 32years later, this discovery was considered as a key contribution in genetics by the next generation, and she was granted the Nobel Prize of biology at the same time. Even in today, most famous scientists still encounter a lot of questions from others and constantly revise their own theories. Maybe their feats can only be decided by future generations,

Additionally, realization of one's achievement is confined to certain historical and political background. In fact, the greatness of individuals, especially in literature, can never be recognized without their works being known by a large amount of people. One obtrusive instance is the well-known novel <<The Story of The Stone>> written by CaoXueqing , Which Was Listed as forbidden book by the ruler in Qing period, for it include a lot of negative viewpoints against Feudalism. Because of this regulation, few had read this novel, let alone to appreciated its social and literary value. Until several decades later, it was recognized as the highest accomplishment in China's literary history. On the contrary, once in a democratic nation which permit latitude, authors are able to present their works freely.Cervantes, writer of the satire novel <<Don Quixote >> which attacked the harmful atmosphere of idealism among aristocrats and feudalists in that era, quickly became the best selling, Cervantes was also honored as excellent writer by his peers. To some extent, the themes of the two novels are similar, yet, the time asked for recognition are totally different.

Nevertheless, the importance of people can be praised immediately owing to particular history events. Since they often play a vital role in change severe situations , their contribution are hardly  ignorant by their peers. Abraham Lincoln, the 16th presidents in America, who had led the Civil War, was widely supported by citizens in his time; Franklin Roosevelt, who successfully reverse declining economy by adopting new Deal in America during 1930s, was acclaimed by the populace; Martin Luther King, the leader of the movement for civil rights, was highly admired by the black. Obviously, specific events create opportunities for their quick acceptance .
林肯不能说是widely supported吧，他要废奴的时候一半的州脱离联邦，内战胜利以后他还被反对者刺杀

In sum, without commensurate vision about new things, their peers may not recognize the attainment achievements? of scientists; without relatively free political atmosphere, the authors may get no access to the realization; without appropriate chance, the greatness of individual may not be revealed to the public. Hence, whether the contributions of individuals are acknowledged by their contemporaries or those who live after them largely depend on certain circumstance.

总之，写得不错。几乎找不到缺陷。如果时间再符合要求的话，我觉得5分以上没问题。
互拍：https://bbs.gter.net/viewthre ... type%26typeid%3D101

逗逗UID: 173558

so猫改作文还是很好的啊，受益匪浅。不过一星期只能改一篇，下礼拜再让她给偶改，希望下篇文章能好一些

偶也是很期待猫猫帮我改啊，可是今天凌晨发的连接显示的是昨天的日期，可能没机会了吧，俺只有等下次了．上个星期两位６Ｇ的前辈帮我改的也让我受益非浅啊．下次你发新文章短我一下，大家一起加油哈

ZEALPALADINUID: 192560

36"The greatness of individuals can be decided only by those who live after them, not by their contemporaries."
1 由于同代人理解能力的局限,一些伟人可能需要后代人认可,主要是科学领域.
2在特定的历史背景下,一些作品可能无法公布,直到后来才被人认可,而另一些处于宽松  言论环境下的作者则很快得到承认.
3特殊的历史事件使一些伟人得到了当代人立即的承认.
Do the greatness of individuals should be appreciated only by the future generation rather than their peers? In my view, the answer is closely associated with specific situations. In some cases, achievements of people do need a long time for recognition, while in others, they are likely to be realized这个词可以这样用么？ by their contemporaries.

Since prominent people are far more talented than their peers, novel ideas or discoveries raised by them may beyond the understanding of their contemporaries, thus not be widely accepted. This situation has frequently happened in the realm of science. For one hand, due to the limitation of scientific development, most people are confined to existed theories and lack sufficient recognition for creative ideas that surpass average level of current study. Therefore, once a new idea is emerged, it will inevitably incur challenges by researchers formfrom? the same field. Especially when a new view contradicts the acknowledged system, the one who build it may be treated as "crazy" and this view as" eccentric". For the other handon one hand, on the other hand?, as continuous reexamination for previous theories accounts for a large part in the improvement of science, it requires a relatively long time to substantiate novel ideas. Barbara McClintock, for example, when firstly put forward the theory of transposon in 1951, had confronted with numerous attacks form his counterparts. Being deeply influenced by the theory of classic genetics, her coeval scientists can never imagine genes that "dance" from one genome to another. In spite of disapproval from her peers, McClintock stuck to her original research. 32years可以这样用吗？ later, this discovery was considered as a key contribution in genetics by the next generation, and she was granted the Nobel Prize of biology at the same time. Even in today, most famous scientists still encounter a lot of questions from others and constantly revise their own theories. Maybe their feats can only be decided by future generations,唯一的一点疑惑是楼主在分ONE HAND的时候说不同时期的人受当时的条件限制，为什么展开来说一下，例子也很好找。

Additionally, realization of one's achievement is confined to certain historical and political background. In fact, the greatness of individuals, especially in literature, can never be recognized without their works being known by a large amount of people. One obtrusive instance is the well-known novel <<The Story of The Stone>> written by CaoXueqing , Which Was Listed as forbidden book by the ruler in Qing period, for it include a lot of negative viewpoints against Feudalism. Because of this regulation, few had read this novel, let alone to appreciated its social and literary value. Until several decades later, it was recognized as the highest accomplishment in China's literary history. On the contrary, once in a democratic nation which permit latitude, authors are able to present their works freely.Cervantes, writer of the satire novel <<Don Quixote >> which attacked the harmful atmosphere of idealism among aristocrats and feudalists in that era, quickly became the best sellingbest seller, Cervantes was also honored as excellent writer by his peers. To some extent, the themes of the two novels are similar, yet, the time asked for recognition are totally different.英文中应该是不用书名号的，大写就可以了吧，论证上没看出什么问题，DREAM OF RED MANSION更常用些吧

Nevertheless, the importance of people can be praised immediately owing to particular history events. Since they often play a vital role in change severe situations , their contribution are hardly  ignorant by their peers. Abraham Lincoln, the 16th presidents in America, who had led the Civil War, was widely supported by citizens in his time; Franklin Roosevelt, who successfully reverse declining economy by adopting new DealNew Deal? in America during 1930s, was acclaimed by the populace; Martin Luther King, the leader of the movement for civil rights, was highly admired by the black. Obviously, specific events create opportunities for their quick acceptance .如果把中心句提前，在本段开头就提出对当时的社会产生重大影响的人更容易被同时代的人认同，会更明确些

In sum, without commensurate vision about new things, their peers may not recognize the attainment of scientists; without relatively free political atmosphere, the authors may get no access to the realization; without appropriate chance, the greatness of individual may not be revealed to the public. Hence, whether the contributions of individuals are acknowledged by their contemporaries or those who live after them largely depend on certain circumstance.
汗一下先。。。整篇文章并未看出什么大的逻辑上的错误，不过想起so猫昨天给我提的建议中关于段与段之间有效的联系的话，回头看楼主的文章，在这方面应该还有提高的空间。加油！

逗逗UID: 173558

谢谢ZEALPALADIN的修改,先羡慕你限时成功哈
你提的问题偶也是在郁闷中,每次写平衡观点时,都想把两方面穿插起来,段与段之间也能自然过渡,可是每次写的时候都做不到,还老害怕跑题了,SIGH!

wangtan8319UID: 2107594

搂住，你多长时间写的请问

runningpiggyUID: 194977

呵呵。。。。。最近考试。。。。。这次没时间帮你改了。。。

大概看了一下。。。。我觉得这篇东西如果分领域来写可能会写得快一点。。。。而且能说得话似乎也多一点。。。。

至于打字的问题。。。。写得多了自然就会好的。。。。。。而且即使不记得。。。。也别望着键盘打字。。。。。不记得就瞎猜一下。。。。猜得多了就记得哪个字母在哪个位置了。。。。

逗逗UID: 173558

呵呵，runningpiggy总是这样的关心后辈哈，最近偶也为考试头疼啊
因为老外有篇好象就是分领域写的，所以我想换个思路。
下来会好好练，谢谢前辈，祝期末顺利！

so猫UID: 148633

按照顺序来看了下
这么多人改了偶就算了哈~
下次吧下次吧~