issue4 被限时的工具气死了，缓过劲来重头写的！

翦瞳UID：184872

这是没有限时的时候挤出来的东西，修改了很久了，没人看就算了，反正也快考了。
一天写一篇也是必要的，否则就生了
issue4  No field of study can advance significantly unless outsiders bring their knowledge and experience to that field of study.

------正文------

Looking back history, we can find many examples that outsiders bring their knowledge to a given field and improve it significantly. However, regarding outsiders as the single propulsion is groundless lack of overall perspective. We should confess the insiders have a vital effect on the progress. Moreover, some insiders are versatile in many fields and they propel his major field forwards significantly.

In our competitive and developing society, the study in a field always involves many other relative faculties. Cooperating with outsiders can inspire specialists to think of new theory or skill to advance their faculties. Engineers need biologists to provide some structure of animals to imitate its efficiency. For example, the technology of radar is a copy of the way with which bats use for orientation to search food and contact with others. Without the introduction of the principle of bat orientation, there was not the radar which applied broadly in military area and civil aviation. In other words, the biologists bring their knowledge about bat orientation to engineers so they create the practical technology of radar. In this regard, we could say outsiders can indeed help a given field to advance significantly sometime.

However, we should not neglect the fact that some fields can advance without outsiders' participation. After all, specialists in local faculties are the prominent experts who maintain the stable and persistent improvement in all ages and under most circumstance there is no other knowledge but their own which leads them to progress. Take Albert Einstein who we all are familiar with for example. He proposed great relativity theory without any outsiders’ knowledge. We can not deny the effect and advance of the relativity as well as the fact that he thought of it with his own knowledge. The statement is an absolute assertion that it attributes all advances to laymen while ignores other impetus which can propel some fields of study. But in fact, it is experts who directly improve and play a vital role in their local fields.

In addition, we should take into account that many scientists and artists are versatile in many aspects. They master more than one kind of knowledge. For example, Spanish artist Picasso, who was famous for his paintings, was versed in painting, sculpture, ceramics and stage design; Newton, who created the law of gravity, had a considerable knowledge in physics and mathematics; Aristotle, who contributed a lot to calculus, was good at geometry, arithmetic and physics. They had abundant knowledge involved several fields and advanced their fields significantly without any help of outsiders.

In sum, it is partial to claim that only laymen who bring their knowledge can improve the study of a supposed field. There are other ways more than outsiders to advance fields of study. Some own have abundant and useful knowledge involved several fields which is enough to progress while others have talent and professional knowledge to advance in their fields without outsiders’ knowledge.

[ Last edited by 翦瞳 on 2005-7-30 at 20:44 ]

mkb57288UID：2105771

占位子，希望翦瞳还能看到

mkb57288UID：2105771

Looking back history, we can find many examples that outsiders bring their knowledge to a given field and improve it significantly. However, regarding outsiders as the single propulsion（好词！） is groundless lack of overall（觉得这个词不是很合适，complete） perspective. We should confess the insiders have a vital effect on the progress. Moreover, some insiders are versatile in many fields and they propel his major field forwards significantly.（感觉开头稍微有一点散，但还是把观点表达明确了）

In our competitive and developing society, the study in a field always involves many other relative faculties. Cooperating with outsiders can inspire specialists to think of new theory or skill to advance their faculties. Engineers need biologists to provide some structure of animals to imitate its efficiency. For example, the technology of radar is a copy of the way with（in） which bats use for orientation （后面的删掉也可，已经跟想说明的问题没有什么关系了，那样例子更简洁有力）to search food and contact with others. Without the introduction of the principle of bat orientation, there was not the radar which applied broadly in military area and civil aviation. In other words, the biologists bring their knowledge about bat orientation to engineers so they create the practical technology of radar. In this regard, we could say（删） outsiders can indeed help a given field to advance significantly sometime.

However, we should not neglect the fact that some fields can advance without outsiders' participation. After all, specialists in local（这个词不大对吧 certain） faculties are the prominent experts who maintain the stable and persistent improvement in all ages and under most circumstance there is no other knowledge but their own which leads them （有一点指代不清）to progress. Take Albert Einstein who we all are familiar with for example. He . （For example, Albert Einstein, as we know,proposed relativity theory .... ）We can not deny the effect and advance of the relativity as well as the fact that he（还是把名字写上吧，这样有点不清晰） thought of it with his own knowledge. The statement is an absolute assertion that it attributes all advances to laymen while ignores other impetus which can propel some fields of study. But in fact, it is experts who directly improve and play a vital role in their local fields.

In addition, we should take into account that many scientists and artists are versatile in many aspects. They master more than one kind of knowledge. For example, Spanish artist Picasso, who was famous for his paintings, was （also versed in sculpture, ceramics and stage design）; Newton, who created the law of gravity, had a considerable knowledge in physics and mathematics; Aristotle, who contributed a lot to calculus, was good at geometry, arithmetic and physics. They had abundant knowledge involved several fields and advanced their fields significantly without any help of outsiders.（虽然明白了你这一段想表述的意思，但可能和题目之间还不是那么直接有力）

In sum, it is partial to claim that only laymen who bring their knowledge can improve the study of a supposed field. There are other ways more than outsiders to advance fields of study. Some own have abundant and useful knowledge involved several fields which is enough to progress while others have talent and professional knowledge to advance in their fields without outsiders’ knowledge.

mkb57288UID：2105771

总体感觉不错，整个结构是清晰的，例子也很恰当，但觉得语言方面还可以更简洁些，加油