argument9 Cappuccino☆作业(Coffee)

Cappuccino☆UID：2155660

argument9 Fifteen years ago, Omega University implemented a new procedure that encouraged students to evaluate the teaching effectiveness of all their professors. Since that time, Omega professors have begun to assign higher grades in their classes, and overall student grade averages at Omega have risen by thirty percent. Potential employers apparently believe the grades at Omega are inflated; this would explain why Omega graduates have not been as successful at getting jobs as have graduates from nearby Alpha University. To enable its graduates to secure better jobs, Omega University should now terminate student evaluation of professors.

1. thaer may be other facors for high grades except evaluating professor
2. invalid compare between Omega University and Alpha Uinversity
3. one should not guess employer's favor blindly.
4. terminate evaluation of professors may not cause find better jobs.

The author states that regulation of evaluating professors in Omega Univerity should be terminated because it impede graduates to obtain better jobs, giving reason that higher greades are received in classes thanks to the evaluation of professors among students and the high employing rates of Alpha University nearby. Through scrutiny of this argument, we could find a seris of logical holes that drives his or her statements unconvincing.

First of all, higher grades in the classes may be caused by some factors other than students' evaluating their professors. According to the author, because of the institution of evaluating, professors assign high score in their classes to flatter students, preventing receiving low evaluation.
In this case, the reality of evaluation, maded by Omaga University fifteen years ago, whose main purpose is to boost the teaching quality by supervising professors by students, is distorted in this arguemnt. Morover, high grades obtained by students would attribute to many other factors such as students or professors are work harder who deserves the high grades. Thus, it is too (desicive) to assert evaluation is the only reason causing higher grades.  

Furthermore, the statement make an invalid compare for the employing opportunity between Omega University and Alpha University. There is no evidence to prove that the condition of these two university are completely the same, that is: students' studying and researching ability, professtional fields and general level of faculty diverse. As a result, the opportunity of successfually finding jobs in these two universities may not be compared. Additionally, the maketing requirment from surroundings may also have great efforts to influence the enploying rates of the graduate students. We may assume that there is a big industry not far from Alpha University, requiring more labors and boosting the emplying rates from Alpha University. Not mention these in detail, this argument fells to convince its readers.

Also, the author also states that potential employers would not want to receive gradutes in Omaga because of inflating scores and this inference may not be plausible. It seems, according to the author, the companies would rather like low score students due to their grades are not inflated. In fact, the scores students gains in university could to most degree represent their ability, thus employeers would no doubt willing to accept the students with high score. Therefore, to guess the favor of employers bindly may have less efforts to imporve the employing rates of graduates.

Last but not least, the author propose to terminate student evaluation of professors in order to garantee finding better jobs. It is ridiculous to make a relationship between institution of evaluation in a university and better jobs provinding. Firstly, suppose Omaga has terminate the evaluation, professors may fell they are not be supervised by their students and have less obligation to teach well, resulting a decrease of teaching quality and making students to receive less knowledge in the classes. In this case, instead of higher opportunity of find better jobs the author mentioned, graduates would find they are more difficult to be employed by any company.

In sum, Omaga University's problem may not justify the argument's sweeping conslution to terminate student evaluation of professors. Lacking details to prove that the high grades students received are only because of the evaluation as well as states the condition of Omaga and Alpha are completely the same, the proposal of abolish institution of evaluation may be an error. In fact, the univeristy should improve the general level of their students' abilities to secure better jobs.

shielUID：2140229

我的才刚刚写完, 现在来好好学习一下------


The author states that regulation of evaluating professors in Omega Univerity should be terminated because it impede (学学)graduates to obtain better jobs, giving reason that higher greades are received in classes thanks to the evaluation of professors among students and the high employing rates of Alpha University nearby. Through scrutiny of this argument, we could find a seris (series是吧)of logical holes that drives his or her (啊!!我刚刚忘记得这样表达了,哦--)statements unconvincing.

First of all, higher grades in the classes may be caused by some factors other than students' evaluating their professors. According to the author, because of the institution of evaluating, professors assign high score in their classes to flatter students, preventing receiving low evaluation. (分析得很准确的呀, 学习学习)In this case, the reality of evaluation, maded by Omaga University fifteen years ago, whose main purpose is to boost the teaching quality by supervising professors by students, is distorted (是该这么说)in this arguemnt. Morover, high grades obtained by students would attribute to many other factors such as students or professors are work harder who deserves the high grades. Thus, it is too (desicive) to assert evaluation is the only reason causing higher grades.  

Furthermore, the statement make an invalid (就是就是) compare for the employing opportunity between Omega University and Alpha University. There is no evidence to prove that the condition of these two university are completely the same, that is: students' studying and researching ability, professtional fields and general level of faculty diverse. As a result, the opportunity of successfually finding jobs in these two universities may not be compared. Additionally, the maketing requirment from surroundings may also have great efforts to influence the enploying rates of the graduate students. We may assume that there is a big industry not far from Alpha University, requiring more labors and boosting the emplying rates from Alpha University. Not mention these in detail, this argument fells to convince its readers.

Also, the author also states that potential employers would not want to receive gradutes in Omaga because of inflating scores and this inference may not be plausible. It seems, according to the author, the companies would rather like low score students due to their grades are not inflated (呵呵). In fact, the scores students gains in university could to most degree represent their ability, thus employeers would no doubt willing to accept the students with high score. Therefore, to guess the favor of employers bindly may have less efforts to imporve the employing rates of graduates.

Last but not least, the author propose to terminate student evaluation of professors in order to garantee finding better jobs. It is ridiculous to make a relationship between institution of evaluation in a university and better jobs provinding. Firstly, suppose Omaga has terminate the evaluation, professors may fell they are not be supervised by their students and have less obligation to teach well, resulting a decrease of teaching quality and making students to receive less knowledge in the classes. In this case, instead of higher opportunity of find better jobs the author mentioned, graduates would find they are more difficult to be employed by any company.

In sum, Omaga University's problem may not justify the argument's sweeping conslution to terminate student evaluation of professors. Lacking details to prove that the high grades students received are only because of the evaluation as well as states the condition of Omaga and Alpha are completely the same, the proposal of abolish institution of evaluation may be an error. In fact, the univeristy should improve the general level of their students' abilities to secure better jobs.

论证得真好,  我的根本就没法看了, 唉---  
多多学习, 我要进步,;P

Cappuccino☆UID：2155660

呵呵~~其实我写阿狗也是新手~~
不过昨天看了Huson的论证,那种作出假设,推出矛盾的方法才茅塞顿开,今天就来试试

呵呵~~互相帮助就是提高快啊:lol

shielUID：2140229

恩呀.  这个方法一定要学学. 我现在就是在分析各种可能的原因, 而没有做什么推断.

恩, 加上推断,文章会更丰满.......

taotaoQUID：2105710

刚弄完阿狗９，趁热来看看阿布的

1.        thaer may be other facors for high grades except evaluating professor
2. invalid compare between Omega University and Alpha Uinversity
3. one should not guess employer's favor blindly.
4. terminate evaluation of professors may not cause find better jobs.

The author states that regulation of evaluating professors in Omega Univerity（university） should be terminated because it impede graduates to obtain better jobs, giving reason that higher greades(grades) are received in classes thanks to the evaluation of professors among students and( the high employing rates of Alpha University nearby. 这一句改成lower employing rates of Omega University是不是要好点？突出比较) Through scrutiny of this argument, we could find a seris（serise） of logical holes that drives his or her statements unconvincing.

First of all, higher grades in the classes may be caused by some factors other than students' evaluating their professors. According to the author, because of the institution of evaluating, professors assign high score in their classes to (flatter students? Flatter students’ grades), preventing receiving low evaluation.
In this case, the reality of evaluation, maded(made) by Omega University fifteen years ago, whose main purpose is to boost the teaching quality by supervising professors by students, is distorted in this argument(argument). Morover(moreover), high grades obtained by students would attribute to many other factors such as students or professors（are去掉) work harder who deserves（deserve） the high grades. Thus, it is too desicive (decisive果断应该换成武断吧:dogmatic)to assert evaluation is the only reason causing higher grades.  

Furthermore, the statement make(makes) an invalid compare for the employing opportunity between Omega University and Alpha University. There is no evidence to prove that the condition of these two university are completely the same, that is: students' studying and researching ability, professtional(professional) fields and general level of faculty diverse. As a result, the opportunity of successfually(successfully) finding jobs in(between) these two universities may not be compared. Additionally,the maketing(marketing) requirement from surroundings may also have great efforts to influence(in influencing) the employing rates of the (graduate students?是研究生，毕业生是graduates). We may assume that there is a big industry not far from Alpha University, requiring more labors and boosting the emplying rates from Alpha University. Not mention these in detail, this argument fells(fail) to convince its readers.

Also, the author also states that potential employers would not want to receive graduates in Omega because of inflating scores and this inference may not be plausible. It seems, according to the author, the companies would rather like low score students due to their grades are not inflated. In fact, the scores students gains(gain) in university could to most degree represent their ability, thus employers would no doubt willing(will) to accept the students with high score. Therefore, to guess the favor of employers bindle may have less efforts to improve the employing rates of graduates.

Last but not least, the author propose（proposes） to terminate student evaluation of professors in order to guarantee finding better jobs. It is ridiculous to make a relationship between institution of evaluation in a university and better jobs providing. Firstly, suppose Omega (has terminate) the evaluation, professors may fell(feel) they are not be supervised by their students and have less obligation to teach well, resulting a decrease of teaching quality and making students (to去掉) receive less knowledge in the classes. In this case, instead of higher opportunity of find（finding） better jobs the author mentioned, graduates would find they are more difficult to be employed by any company.

In sum, (Omega University's problem may not justify the argument's sweeping conclusion to terminate student evaluation of professors.?) Lacking details to prove that the high grades students received are only because of the evaluation as well as states the condition of Omaga and Alpha are completely the same, the proposal of abolish institution of evaluation may be an error. In fact, the university should improve the general level of their students' abilities to secure better jobs

综合来看，逻辑错误点都写到了的，但这一篇的语言表达较以前的好像有点马虎，结构也不是很清晰,是不是考试没时间哦，呵呵！大家一起加油！

[ Last edited by taotaoQ on 2005-12-28 at 13:01 ]