issue4 toheart zhangheng1020

zhangheng1020UID: 2130513

TOPIC：ISSUE 4 - "No field of study can advance significantly unless outsiders bring their knowledge and experience to that field of study."
WORDS：530          TIME：0:56:18          DATE：2006-2-10

In this issue, the writer believed that only by learning knowledge and experience from other researching fields, great advance can be made
In my opinion, however, I believe significantly advance can be promoted by picking knowledge and experience from others.  However, that is not the absolute choice for every researcher.

Admittedly, it is easier to make a great progress in a field of study by taking the knowledge and experience from other place. By listening the lecture in other fields, researcher might find the bright idea. It is mainly because in nowadays, the further a research is, more specific it be. In the progress of researching, not only one have to grasp the found on one or two fields, one has also "dig in" for the potential answer. No one can be sure his selected direction can lead to the proper answer. Not only perspective, in scientific research, it is also easy to lost especially when that is in highly competitive researching "hot points" as Bio-information. In that way, bring some knowledge and to see how does the achievement make in other fields is a helpful inspiration for each researcher.  No wonder It is a culture in many university that 报告sememiey are organized in fixed lunch time. And people can listen the latest reports with a free surrounding. In that way, bright idea comes. In NIH, National Institution of Health, for example, different professors in different researching fields are invited and the radiocast record is published freely to international researchers all over the world.

However, that promote comes with the active attitude on the unsolved problems in every potential attempt. Without a positive scientific attitude, it is easy to be misleaded. Such example is popular too. As for science, it is the principle that a researcher should respect the fact, persist truth. However, there are some liers /shammers who are thirsty for fame draw in the "crossed-research" and expect the illusion that he can cook the data, stretch the truth, cheat the public in some rare researched fields. Or they even daydream that it is a cut-path for fame or title as by bring knowledge from different fields, it is easier to fool the superintendence. Such cheating behavior is career suicide and should never be encouraged.   

Finally, It is unscientific of a researcher draw in other fields without knowing some basic of his won researching fields. The addiction on other knowledge and experience is not catholicon in science research. Additionally, without grasping his own researching fields, it is hard to find a clearly direction in the cross-field learning. Sometime, even if the solution is ahead, one might be blind and ignored the chance, as on the progress of finding, without a solider foundation and a clearly aim, it is easy to lost in the numerous researching fields.

All in all, it is true that by learning from other fields, one is easier to find the creative highlight in his researching fields. But that inspiration comes with a thoughtfully grasping in one's professional fields. And it is that totally understanding of his current fields and the sensitive attempt in every possible method for the current break that brings the significantly advance.

dinddind2003UID: 196353

TOPIC：ISSUE 4 - "No field of study can advance significantly unless outsiders bring their knowledge and experience to that field of study."
WORDS：530          TIME：0:56:18          DATE：2006-2-10

In this issue, the writer believed that only by learning knowledge and experience from other researching fields, great advance can be made
In my opinion, however, I believe significantly advance can be promoted by picking knowledge and experience from others.  However, that is not the absolute choice for every researcher.

Admittedly, it is easier to make a great progress in a field of study by taking the knowledge and experience from other place. By listening the lecture in other fields, researcher might find the bright idea. It is mainly because in nowadays, the further a research is, more specific it be. In the progress of researching, not only one have to grasp the found on one or two fields, one has also "dig in" for the potential answer. No one can be sure his selected direction can lead to the proper answer. Not only perspective, in scientific research, it is also easy to lost especially when that is in highly competitive researching "hot points" as Bio-information. In that way, bring some knowledge and to see how does the achievement make in other fields is a helpful inspiration for each researcher.  No wonder It is a culture in many university that 报告sememiey are organized in fixed lunch time. And people can listen the latest reports with a free surrounding. In that way, bright idea comes. In NIH, National Institution of Health, for example, different professors in different researching fields are invited and the radiocast record is published freely to international researchers all over the world.

However, that promote comes with the active attitude on the unsolved problems in every potential attempt. Without a positive scientific attitude, it is easy to be misleaded. Such example is popular too. As for science, it is the principle that a researcher should respect the fact, persist truth. However, there are some liers /shammers who are thirsty for fame draw in the "crossed-research" and expect the illusion that he can cook the data, stretch the truth, cheat the public in some rare researched fields. Or they even daydream that it is a cut-path for fame or title as by bring knowledge from different fields, it is easier to fool the superintendence. Such cheating behavior is career suicide and should never be encouraged.    （这段讲的是我们治学的态度？有点延伸的味道）

Finally, It is unscientific of a researcher draw in other fields without knowing some basic of his won researching fields（不如直接讲some basic of his won researching fields很重要，然后再跟一句少了ome basic of his won researching fields很危险）. The addiction on other knowledge and experience is not catholicon in science research. Additionally, without grasping his own researching fields, it is hard to find a clearly direction in the cross-field learning. Sometime, even if the solution is ahead, one might be blind and ignored the chance, as on the progress of finding, without a solider foundation and a clearly aim, it is easy to lost in the numerous researching fields.

All in all, it is true that by learning from other fields, one is easier to find the creative highlight in his researching fields. But that inspiration comes with a thoughtfully grasping in one's professional fields. And it is that totally understanding of his current fields and the sensitive attempt in every possible method for the current break that brings the significantly advance.

总体来说你只是讲了一个学科借助其他学科可以很好发展，原因是可以吸取新想法。其实还有很多其他原因的，比如学科间的交叉使得一个学科的研究要其他学科的支持，许多学科已经发展到了尽头需要其他学科指引一下发展方向。

然后你说了一个学科自身的知识很重要，就是B3，这段可以了。

中间一段B2感觉有点延伸，在你的B1的思想有点少（论述的倒是挺充分的）的情况下，延伸的话容易让人觉得你有点偏。

不过比以前的文章思路清楚多了，加油。