寄托天下
查看: 1310|回复: 4
打印 上一主题 下一主题

[i习作temp] issue141 大家看看找不到什么好例子啊 [复制链接]

Rank: 4

声望
0
寄托币
832
注册时间
2005-9-24
精华
0
帖子
2
跳转到指定楼层
楼主
发表于 2006-7-20 15:21:57 |只看该作者 |倒序浏览
TOPIC: ISSUE141 - "Most people recognize the benefits of individuality, but the fact is that personal economic success requires conformity."
WORDS: 415        TIME: 0:45:00          DATE: 2006-7-20

Is personal economic success maily because conformity, as the author claim so? In my opinion , conformists who strongly associate with cooperation are more likely to succeed in the traditional areas while the non-conformists who in certain degree may means innovation have more opportunities to achieve in newer industries .Therefore, both of them are required and keep in balance to succeed in the fierce competition economic- driven society .

In traditional industries, personal success comes to those who can work most effectively under the restricted established regulation, policies and practices rather than non-conformists .It is true that a creative legal deal and clever ideas might play a important role in winning a small battle. However, the such tactics are those conformists who are playing by the same ground rules as their peers ,winners are just better.

In addition, the successes of those conformists largely depend on their strong sense of cooperation which lead to more effective in working than those who put the individuality as the first one. No one can deny the fact that five fingers are more efficient more one. In this case , conformists tend to foster the habits of appraise teamwork. Only by cooperating with others , can they stimulate the their effectness, solve problem unconciously through discussing some particular problem , cultivate the good term of others as well as expose their ideas to others' way of thinking thus learing more and gaining more. All of these lead to more effectively operation or working and naturally gain the upper hand in the fierce competition.

On the other hand, non-conformists who may more likely to innovate in specail areas have more chance to win the industries which are newer and require more fresh ideas than general industries. An example that occurs frequently with managers and human resources in bussiness in the idea of forming cross-functional task forces by choosing  individual across several different functional areas to adress the particular dilemma facing the company. It is the idea of" thinking outside the box. " or looking beyong the normal solutions that would be proposed by the particular department which is affected by the problem. Only through individuality which in most cases means as innovation, can the company meet consumers' needs to gain the comparable advantages  in the rapid technology development of market-driven economy and survive at last.

In conclusion, without conformists' sense of cooperation ,individuals will be achieve little and ineffectiveness .Without non-conformists' sense of innovation ,individuals will be loss the impulse of competion. And thus , in order to achieve personal economic goal in the society ,the clever choice is that balancely take advantage of both of them.

写合作的找不到什么好例子~  这类题目应该还是比较重要的吧
回应
0

使用道具 举报

Rank: 10Rank: 10Rank: 10

声望
48
寄托币
21986
注册时间
2005-8-13
精华
24
帖子
191

Pisces双鱼座 荣誉版主

沙发
发表于 2006-7-21 22:48:18 |只看该作者
Is personal economic success maily because of conformity, as the author claim so? In my opinion , conformists who strongly associate with cooperation are more likely to succeed in the traditional areas while the non-conformists who, in certain degree,(这样断开显得句式有变化) may means innovation have more opportunities to achieve in newer industries .Therefore, both of them are required and keep in balance to succeed in the fierce competition economic- driven society .

In traditional industries, personal success comes to those who can work most effectively under the restricted established regulation, policies and practices rather than non-conformists .It is true that a creative legal deal and clever ideas might play a important role in winning a small battle. However, the such tactics are those conformists who are playing by the same ground rules as their peers ,winners are just better.

In addition, the successes of those conformists largely depend on their strong sense of cooperation which lead to more effective in working than those who put the individuality as the first one. No one can deny the fact that five fingers are more efficient more one. In this case , conformists tend to foster the habits of appraise teamwork. Only by cooperating with others , can they stimulate the their effectness, solve problem unconciously through discussing some particular problem , cultivate the good term of others as well as expose their ideas to others' way of thinking thus learing more and gaining more. All of these lead to more effectively operation or working and naturally gain the upper hand in the fierce competition.

On the other hand, non-conformists who may more likely to innovate in specail areas have more chance to win the industries which are newer and require more fresh ideas than general industries. An example that occurs frequently with managers and human resources in bussiness in the idea of forming cross-functional task forces by choosing  individual across several different functional areas to adress the particular dilemma facing the company. It is the idea of" thinking outside the box. " or looking beyong the normal solutions that would be proposed by the particular department which is affected by the problem. Only through individuality which in most cases means as innovation, can the company meet consumers' needs to gain the comparable advantages  in the rapid technology development of market-driven economy and survive at last.

In conclusion, without conformists' sense of cooperation ,individuals will be achieve little and ineffectiveness .Without non-conformists' sense of innovation ,individuals will be loss the impulse of competion. And thus , in order to achieve personal economic goal in the society ,the clever choice is that balancely take advantage of both of them.

思路很好,用的分类的思想,合作的例子其实你也可以编,或者还有一种写法就是用一种东西做比喻,比如球类竞技,嵌入式的夹在你的原文中写
[url=https://bbs.gter.net/forum-1010-1.html][color=orange][size=5][b]新开版的Architecture & Planning[/b][/size][/color][/url]

[url=https://bbs.gter.net/thread-710220-1-1.html][color=green][size=4][u][b]★欢迎加入08工科版专业联盟,热烈讨论中★[/b][/u][/size][/color][/url]

[url=https://bbs.gter.net/thread-708803-1-1.html][color=blue][b]08fall土木工程讨论大贴[/b][/color][/url]

[url=https://bbs.gter.net/thread-713603-1-1.html][color=blue][b]08fall环境工程讨论大贴[/b][/color][/url]

[url=https://bbs.gter.net/thread-686771-1-1.html][color=blue][b]08EE/ECE/CS大贴[/b][/color][/url]

[url=https://bbs.gter.net/thread-718501-1-1.html][color=blue][b]08fallMSE材料科学与工程大贴[/b][/color][/url]

[url=https://bbs.gter.net/thread-716498-1-2.html][color=blue][b]08fallME & AME讨论大贴[/b][/color][/url]
[color=red]更多专业联盟,期待你的参与[/color]

-------------------------------------
[size=3][i]我们一次又一次的飞走,
                  是为了一次又一次的归来[/i][/size]

使用道具 举报

Rank: 4

声望
0
寄托币
832
注册时间
2005-9-24
精华
0
帖子
2
板凳
发表于 2006-7-21 23:33:29 |只看该作者
谢谢.这么说我就有思路了~  你这两天的作文很少啊.还有阿宝也是.我都快找不到要改的

使用道具 举报

Rank: 5Rank: 5

声望
0
寄托币
1910
注册时间
2005-12-22
精华
1
帖子
6
地板
发表于 2006-7-21 23:35:24 |只看该作者
TOPIC: ISSUE141 - "Most people recognize the benefits of individuality, but the fact is that personal economic success requires conformity."

Is personal economic success maily [mainly] because [(of)] conformity, as the author claim [claims] so? In my opinion , conformists [conformist 是有特殊含义的] who strongly associate with cooperation are more likely to succeed in the traditional areas while the non-conformists who in certain degree may means innovation have more opportunities to achieve in newer industries .Therefore, both of them are required and keep in balance to succeed in the fierce competition economic- driven society [in the economic-driven society where fierce competition prevails] .

In [(the)] traditional industries, personal success comes to those who can work most effectively under the restricted established regulation, policies and practices rather than non-conformists .It is true that a creative legal deal and clever ideas might play a important role in winning a small battle. However, the such tactics are those conformists who are playing by the same ground rules as their peers ,winners are just better. [这段实际上没有说清为什么那些conform的人优势]

In addition, the successes of those conformists largely depend on their strong sense of cooperation which lead to more effective in working than those who put the individuality as the first one. No one can deny the fact that five fingers are more efficient more one. In this case , conformists tend to foster the habits of appraise teamwork. Only by cooperating with others , can they stimulate the their effectness [effectiveness] , solve problem unconciously through discussing some particular problem , cultivate the good term of others as well as expose their ideas to others' way of thinking thus learing more and gaining more. All of these lead to more effectively [effective] operation or working and naturally gain the upper hand in the fierce competition.

On the other hand, non-conformists who may [(be)]  more  likely to innovate in specail areas have more chance to win the industries which are newer and require more fresh ideas than general industries. An example that occurs frequently with managers and human resources in bussiness in the idea of forming cross-functional task forces by choosing  individual across several different functional areas to adress the particular dilemma facing the company. It is the idea of" thinking outside the box. " or looking beyond the normal solutions that would be proposed by the particular department which is affected by the problem. Only through individuality which in most cases means as innovation [individuality=innovation? 需要论述] , can the company meet consumers' needs to gain the comparable advantages [comparative advantages]   in the rapid technology development of market-driven economy and survive at last.

In conclusion, without conformists' sense of cooperation ,individuals will be achieve little and ineffectiveness .Without non-conformists' sense of innovation ,individuals will be loss the impulse of competion. And thus , in order to achieve personal economic goal in the society ,the clever choice is that balancely [有这这词吗?] take advantage of both of them.


1. 原论题中说大多数人都认同individuality, 自有道理. 论述中应作出让步.
2. 完全赞同在GRE中并不是很可取的. 而且这样一来也很难写长, 写完整.
that's all.

使用道具 举报

Rank: 5Rank: 5

声望
0
寄托币
1910
注册时间
2005-12-22
精华
1
帖子
6
5
发表于 2006-7-21 23:38:01 |只看该作者

使用道具 举报

RE: issue141 大家看看找不到什么好例子啊 [修改]
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

问答
Offer
投票
面经
最新
精华
转发
转发该帖子
issue141 大家看看找不到什么好例子啊
https://bbs.gter.net/thread-498352-1-1.html
复制链接
发送
报offer 祈福 爆照
回顶部