Issue48 ugw战队第四次作业 让砖头来得更猛烈些吧～！

fenghua9801UID: 2191885

TOPIC: ISSUE48 - "The study of history places too much emphasis on individuals. The most significant events and trends in history were made possible not by the famous few, but by groups of people whose identities have long been forgotten."

观点：有保留的赞成
提纲：
1 历史研究确实过于关注名人，但是这也是研究历史最有效的方法
2 过于关注名人及其好处，坏处
3 历史上有意义的事件和潮流绝大多数是因为普通人，名人只是代表
        科学界
        改革
        革命
4历史只能通过研究少数名人来研究当时的背景，毕竟这比研究数量巨大的普通人来说要容易得多，同时也不失代表性。
5 总结

偶的这个提纲参考了别人的，只有4是自己的，哎，思维还是不行啊，每次列提纲都想去死～～～！


The study of history actually places more emphasis on individuals than on the groups of people which also plays a critical role in history. However, the most efficient way to study history may be through the famous few.

When we look into historical books, nobody would doubt that the individuals are over emphasized by the historians since there are bibliographies of a huge amount of famous people. Also, lots of significant invents are owed to the famous few. The advantage of this is that it can set up examples for the citizens, who will be inspired by the heroes and may make great progress as well. However, the disadvantage of it also exists, for it can arouse the most inherent heroic instincts inside everybody, which can not be approved in the modern society since it's a world of cooperation and communication now. Anyone who decides to pursuit something all by himself will probably fail.

Actually, the most significant events and trends are due to the forgotten groups of people, and the famous few are merely the representative of the groups. In the scientific field, no one can obtain his result without the experience the anteceded scientists. Also, if a reform was to be undertaken, it must cater for the multitude otherwise it would not be implemented thoroughly, and the abortion would be the final result. Similarly, the revolution of a country could not be succeeded unless the majority of the citizens were inspired to overthrow the government. Obviously, the groups of people, no matter how minor they were, played an indispensable role in the history.

However, if we consider the issue as a historian, we may conclude that the study of the famous few is the most efficient method to comprehend the history. It would be a rather tough work to analyze the function of every minor group of people, and maybe it is impossible at all. Therefore, the representatives, the famous few, are picked out to be studied for the backgrounds of that particular period. More importantly, some of the groups are nearly forgotten, it is impossible for the historian to study them.

In the final analysis, the study of history should pay more attention to the groups of people which play the same role as the famous few, and all the historians should examine the history with a just mind.

xupeng66UID: 2193287

The study of history actually places more emphasis on individuals than on the groups of people which（who) also plays a critical role in history. However, the most efficient way to study history may be through the famous few.

When we look into historical books, nobody would doubt that the individuals are over emphasized(这里的overemphasized，是个贬义词，这根后面的论述好像不太相符） by the historians since there are bibliographies of a huge amount of famous people. Also, lots of significant invents are owed to the famous few. The advantage of this is that it can set up examples for the citizens, who will be inspired by the heroes and may make great progress as well. However, the disadvantage of it also exists, for it can arouse the most inherent heroic instincts inside everybody, which can not be approved in the modern society since it's a world of cooperation and communication now. Anyone who decides to pursuit something all by himself will probably fail.

Actually, the most significant events and trends are due to the forgotten groups of people, and the famous few are merely the representative of the groups. In the scientific field, no one can obtain his result without the experience the anteceded（antecedent) scientists. Also, if a reform was to be undertaken, it must cater for the multitude(majority) otherwise it would not be implemented thoroughly, and the abortion would be the final result. Similarly, the revolution of a country could not be succeeded(succeed) unless the majority of the citizens were inspired to overthrow the government. Obviously, the groups of people, no matter how minor they were(are), played(play) an indispensable role in the history.

However, if we consider the issue as a historian, we may conclude that the study of the famous few is the most efficient method to comprehend the history. It would be a rather tough work to analyze the function of every minor group of people, and maybe it is impossible at all. Therefore, the representatives, the famous few, are picked out to be studied for the backgrounds of that particular period. More importantly, some of the groups are nearly forgotten, it is impossible for the historian to study them.

In the final analysis, the study of history should pay more attention to the groups of people which play the same role as the famous few, and all the historians
感觉文章的思路还可以， 但是感觉结尾有点仓促，还可以把结论阐述得更充分一些，毕竟这可以给老师留下一个明确的印象。

fenghua9801UID: 2191885

thanks~!