argu2给practise第一次作业,欢迎观看，指点

beibeiyu200307UID: 2223106

argu2 time 54mins keep on !
:rolleyes:The arguer claim that to raise property values in Deerhaven Acres, local homeowners should adopt their own set of restrictions on landscaping and housepainting like homeowners near Brookville did. And to support the recommendation the author also cites some statistical evidence and facts , which , however, is unreliable to justify the recommendation, though the serious scrutiny.

First of all, the author’s recommendation depends on the assumption that no factors other than adopting a set of restrictions on the decoration of community’s yard caused Brookville’s increased property. Nevertheless, common sense informs me that this assumption is a poor one. A myriad of other factors ,including increased national economic situation , changing of demographic factor, and regional tourism development, might just as likely be the cause of Brookville’s increasing property values. Without ruling out these and other possible causes, the arguer cannot justifiably conclude that setting a chain of principles for community yards’ painting and landscaping accounts for or even contributes to its increased property value.

Even assuming the causal relationship is true as mentioned above, the speaker fail to concern the different elements between two religions. There are tremendous distinct respects between the two area, which include the climate condition, general weather situation, or other economy lever. And it is entirely possible that Brookville’s government develop local tourism by relying its effluent comfortable weather and nature screens which attracts more people and business choosing to resident in the place, thereby causing an increased profit for fixed property. Nevertheless, Deerhaven Acres with poor natural resource can not attain the same profit by acting as Brookville’s householders.

Additionally, when citing the statistics to substantiate the final recommendation, the author makes several troubling evidence. Firstly, the author unjustifiably assume the situation for evaluating property is the same as seven years ago for househooders, which is obvious problematic since both the economic condition and the entire social situation is changeable whenever. Moreover, the arguer fail to account for the possibility that it is only several typical projects in Brookville had an great increase in price which improves the average level of land, while what is more common situation for other landholder is not a great increase or even decrease in property profit.

To sum up, in order to make the recommendation more reasonable the author should provide us more clear evidence to substantiate its assumption. And it need more information to to explain
why Deerhaven’s property profit can increase, and weather there are some distinctiveness between Deerhaven and Brookville areas before being convincing to me.