- 最后登录
- 2009-6-26
- 在线时间
- 0 小时
- 寄托币
- 98
- 声望
- 0
- 注册时间
- 2006-1-22
- 阅读权限
- 15
- 帖子
- 1
- 精华
- 0
- 积分
- 84
- UID
- 2178828

- 声望
- 0
- 寄托币
- 98
- 注册时间
- 2006-1-22
- 精华
- 0
- 帖子
- 1
|
俺也发个拙作给大家看看,写的不好:(
The speaker asserts that people can learn as much by watching TV as they can by reading books. At the first glance, this opinion seems to somewhat appealing, but further reflection tell me, agree or disagree with it is a matter of balancing between its pros and cons, but if one has considered the following perspectives, he/she cannot completely agree with it.
Admittedly, followed the development of modern video technology, people learn knowledge not only by reading books, but also acquire the information of their need by watching TV. To begin with, because the TV program was very living and interesting through using different kinds of shooting methods or styles, so people is easy to learn and understand those complicated theories. An example in this case is multimedia teaching, as infant English lecture. Because of the world economic globalization, English as an international language was became much more important. According to a latest survey, more than 80 percent Chinese parents let their infant to learn English, but as we known that English as a language is difficult to learn only by reading texts, while TV programs which owned living picture and melting sound can provide a super environment of learning English. In fact, my niece was learning English by watching an interesting English teaching cartoon that named “Follow the Victor to learn English”.
Furthermore, since the first artificial broadcasting satellite was devoted to transmit the video signal, wherever people lived, and they can obtain real-time information which happened far from them. Those real-time information that cannot find in any books are very useful in when some people make a vital decision. Especially in stock, economy policies, so much as gambling. For example, many people do foreign futures, if they hope to earn much money,the experts of this field often suggested them to watch TV news,because the latest news concluded the new marketing tendency.
Although I agree that people can learn as much by watching TV as they can by reading books, I insist that watching TV cannot instead of reading books. In the first place, watching television can neither provide abstract thinking which is the most crucial texture in advanced scientific research, nor can it teach us the effective management and adequate control of the written language while written language carry the utmost importance in the inheritance and dissemination of knowledge for all human kind. These qualities can be acquired only through the reading, digesting, and ruminating of books. Books contain the collective human knowledge and wisdom accumulated for ages, ever since pre-history. The shallow, short-sighted TV programs are incomparable to the riches in books. In the second place, because the TV programs are faced to the whole audience, it is difficult to imagine who want learn much more advanced and extensive knowledge which about a certain study field by watching TV. Especially in that basic discipline that likes physics, mathematics, and so on.
Consequently, judging from all analysis and reasons mentioned above, which sometimes intertwine to form an organic whole and thus become more persuasive than any one of them, we may safely come to a conclusion: It is still impossible for television to take the place of books, yet they can cooperate to make it easier and interesting for people to learn. |
|