issue 83

georgiayzhUID: 2225237

ISSUE    83
"Government should preserve publicly owned wilderness areas in their natural state, even though these areas are often extremely remote and thus accessible to only a few people."
政府应该保留国家领土中公共拥有的荒凉地区，即使这些地区往往人迹罕至。

提纲：
政府应该保护偏远地区
1for the environment’s sake, it is necessary to do so.虽然人烟稀少，但仍受到人类的破坏。（商业化森林砍伐、农业和种植棕榈树等人类活动，偷猎、交易、森林火灾等也给大猩猩的前途带来严重威胁, 严重影响全球气候和环境）

2、for the economics’ sake, 这样做不只是现在获利，对于the future 也一样获利。
3、in order to preserve the wildness not to dig out to be a place of interest, it is no need to be convenient to access, on the other words, the more remote and inaccessible it is, the more effect it attain.
正文：
  Does the government need to preserve publicly owned wilderness areas in their natural state? The speaker claims so. These areas are, as the speaker asserts, often extremely remote and thus accessible to only a few people, however, I strongly agree with the notion that the government should make appropriate efforts to do so for the sake of environment and economics, in addition, to preserve the wildness not t dig out to be a place of interest.

  Do remote and inaccessible areas amount to no effectiveness? Absolutely not. In order to preserve the wildness not to dig out to be a place of interest, it is no need to be convenient to access, on the other words, the more remote and inaccessible it is, the more effect it attains. Exploration, for example, is attractive and interesting for some brave humans and the wildness areas such as desert and island provide the ideal place for them to challenge their strong will. In order to explain the effectiveness of the protection of the wildness areas more clearly, there are two aspects relevant to our life, as discussed below.

For the environment’s sake, in my view, it is necessary for the government to do so. Although these areas are often extremely remote and thus accessible only a few people, social humans’ conscious or unconscious behaviors have been destroying the wildness time and time again and their behaviors have made detrimental consequences to the world’ environment. For one compelling example, all destroying behaviors such as the clear-cutting of the forest for business, the planting or irrigating of the wildness field for agriculture, and the illegal hunting or trading of pandas for money, have undermined the vegetation of the forest, endangered the existing future of wild animals, and influenced the global climate and environment. Beyond above, the global warming, the depletion of atmospheric ozone, and the ELNINO serve as the caution for the government to keep an eye on the protection of the wildness.

  For the economics’ sake, reserving the wildness can conserve some of the race which may perhaps make unbelievable profit beyond today’s research ability for the future. One needs look no further than the benefits of wildness coming from the realm of medicine. As known to all , people can make extremely huge profit from the developing a specially used medicine, some ingredients of which may be some wildness animals, plants, or even soil of the areas the speaker asserts. What is more, by comparing the chemical characteristics of these wildness with some samples, scientists may gain a significant evidence which provides a path for their research to success. In short, the more sorts of wildness we today reserve, the more profit we will gain in the future.

  In sum, in my view, it is necessary for the government to make efficient and effectiveness measures to preserve the wildness areas. On the one hand, doing so will help protect the environment which has been destroyed by people for a long time; on the other hand, it will make great profit in the future as well as nowadays.