ISSUE51 ,传说中的最高频,互拍

黑色精灵UID: 2217706

传说中的最高频:教育类
51"Education will be truly effective only when it is specifically designed to meet the individual needs and interests of each student."
    TIME:38m     WORDS:501
不同意。
1、 给每个人都制定专门的教学计划不现实。
2、 过分专业化了使得学生不能适应社会。
3、 有一些课程是必须要求学的，不管学生感不感兴趣。（数学，历史，劳动技能）
4、 当然，也要让学生有按自己兴趣选修的权力。
5、 总结上文的观点。

The statement claims that only when education is specially designed for each student will it be really effective. In general, I do not agree with the assertion though I think it has merits to some extent.

Firstly, do you believe that schools could be able to arrange different curriculums for each student? I am afraid not. In the first place, it could be hardly imagined that there are enough teachers to satisfy these students because every one of them has his or her own interests, including many eccentric ones you could not even think of such as. In the second place, evaluation of students would be barely performed since students of different interests take dissimilar courses. So, in this sense, it is impossible for schools to meet each student's distinctive need and interest.

Secondly, more and more ranks of corporate executives are lamenting that college graduates are increasingly specialized which cause them not to adapt to the rapidly changing society. In today's society, people are not only required to hold a special skill, but also needed to have a wide knowledge so as to improve themselves in the practice. No one who is deep in an academic discipline but knows nothing about others will suits society. In a word, schools could not allow students to just study lessons they are interested for it will make them hard to adapt to society.

Thirdly, as is known to everyone, every school in all countries requests students to study such courses as mathematics, history and labor skill and so forth. Is it merely a coincidence? Of course no! The reason is that these lessons are basic to students. For example, history learning tells us what happened in our country in the past, from which we feel proud of our country and then the unity is consolidated. And, mathematics is substantial for other scientific learning and also indispensable for our lives. All in all, students must be demanded to study some curriculums with no consideration of their interests.

However, all mentioned above does not mean that students have no right to learn their interested courses. In fact, besides the curriculums that are required for all students, schools should provide various elective courses for them. For example, in the United States, in many schools Chinese is not required course, nonetheless, with the rapid development of China, more and more students have interest in Chinese either for the cryptic culture or for interest in its alluring economy. Then schools may consider opening Chinese courses to appease students’ needs.

Though there are some other aspects related to the issue, I could not explore them in detail within the limited time. Even so, taking into account of all these factors that have been discussed above, we may come to the conclusion that only in such a way will education be effective that students learn some curriculums which are required for all of them, in the meanwhile, they have the chance to change courses according to their needs and interests.

veinardUID: 2195006

The statement claims that only when education is specially designed for each student will it be really effective. In general, I do not agree with the assertion though I think it has merits to some extent.

Firstly, do you最好不要用You believe that schools could be able to arrange different curriculums for each student? I am afraid not. In the first place, it could be hardly imagined that there are enough teachers to satisfy these students because every one of them has his or her own interests, including many eccentric ones you could not even think of such as such as 后面要加例子. In the second place, evaluation of students would be barely performed since students of different interests take dissimilar courses. 这句论证不够有力So, in this sense, it is impossible for schools to meet each student's distinctive need and interest.

Secondly, more and more ranks of corporate executives are lamenting that college graduates are increasingly specialized which cause them not to adapt to the rapidly changing society. In today's society, people are not only required to hold a special skill, but also needed to have a wide knowledge so as to improve themselves in the practice. No one who is deep in an academic discipline but knows nothing about others will suits society. In a word, schools could not allow students to just study lessons they are interested for it will make them hard to adapt to society.这段没提到interests

Thirdly, as is known to everyone, every school in all countries requests students to study such courses as mathematics, history and labor skill and so forth. Is it merely a coincidence? Of course no! The reason is that these lessons are basic to students. For example, history learning tells us what happened in our country in the past, from which we feel proud of our country and then the unity is consolidated. And, mathematics is substantial for other scientific learning and also indispensable for our lives. All in all, students must be demanded to study some curriculums with no consideration of their interests.

However, all mentioned above does not mean that students have no right to learn their interested courses. In fact, besides the curriculums that are required for all students, schools should provide various elective courses for them. For example, ( in the United States, in many schools Chinese is not required course),这句有问题 nonetheless, with the rapid development of China, more and more students have interest in Chinese either for the cryptic culture or for interest in its alluring economy. Then schools may consider opening Chinese courses to appease students’ needs.

Though there are some other aspects related to the issue, I could not explore them in detail within the limited time. Even so, taking into account of all these factors that have been discussed above, we may come to the conclusion that only in such a way will education be effective that students learn some curriculums which are required for all of them, in the meanwhile, they have the chance to change courses according to their needs and interests.
这篇文章总不错~加油！

nkbluemouseUID: 200665

The statement claims that only when education is specially designed for each student will it be really effective. In general, I do not agree with the assertion though I think it has merits to some extent.

Firstly, do you believe that schools could be able to arrange different curriculums for each student? I am afraid not. In the first place, it could be hardly imagined that there are enough teachers to satisfy these students because every one of them has his or her own interests, including many eccentric ones you could not even think of such as. In the second place, evaluation of students would be barely performed since students of different interests take dissimilar courses. So, in this sense, it is impossible for schools to meet each student's distinctive need and interest.(这一段全部都是否定或者疑问句，总觉作为议论文口气太冲啦，不知道你自己感觉怎么样)

Secondly, more and more ranks of corporate executives are lamenting that college graduates are increasingly specialized which cause them not to adapt to the rapidly changing society. In today's society, people are not only required to hold a special skill, but also needed to have a wide knowledge so as to improve themselves in the practice. No one who is deep in an academic discipline but knows nothing about others will suits society. In a word, schools could not allow students to just study lessons they are interested for it will make them hard to adapt to society.（这一段其实开始好像都和主题兴趣与个人需要有些脱节，只有最后扯了一下，说服力欠佳）

Thirdly, as is known to everyone, every school in all countries requests students to study such courses as mathematics, history and labor skill and so forth. Is it merely a coincidence? Of course no! The reason is that these lessons are basic to students. For example, history learning tells us what happened in our country in the past, from which we feel proud of our country and then the unity is consolidated. And, mathematics is substantial for other scientific learning and also indispensable for our lives. All in all, students must be demanded to study some curriculums with no consideration of their interests.

However, all mentioned above does not mean that students have no right to learn their interested courses. In fact, besides the curriculums that are required for all students, schools should provide various elective courses for them. For example, in the United States, in many schools Chinese is not required course, nonetheless, with the rapid development of China, more and more students have interest in Chinese either for the cryptic culture or for interest in its alluring economy. Then schools may consider opening Chinese courses to appease（这个词好像不太合适用在这里的阿） students’ needs.

Though there are some other aspects related to the issue, I could not explore them in detail within the limited time. Even so, taking into account of all these factors that have been discussed above, we may come to the conclusion that only in such a way will education be effective that students learn some curriculums which are required for all of them, in the meanwhile, they have the chance to change courses according to their needs and interests. （观点很好！）
总的来说还是不错的，结构清晰，观点有新意，但是在协议论文的时候希望你不要总是从反面来说，这样显得十分的冲（请念第四声），有些绝对。议论文的语气应该比较客观一些。对你的速度十分佩服阿，还不到四十分钟就可以作出一篇完整的文章，实在是值得学习。

黑色精灵UID: 2217706

谢谢LS各位了^-^
已经不止一个人说我写的文章语言比较绝对,不知道是不是加些I think, maybe会好一些呢

water116UID: 2282878

good