- 最后登录
- 2008-10-24
- 在线时间
- 0 小时
- 寄托币
- 37
- 声望
- 0
- 注册时间
- 2006-9-27
- 阅读权限
- 15
- 帖子
- 0
- 精华
- 0
- 积分
- 126
- UID
- 2256886

- 声望
- 0
- 寄托币
- 37
- 注册时间
- 2006-9-27
- 精华
- 0
- 帖子
- 0
|
TOPIC: ARGUMENT117 - The following is a memo from the business manager of Valu-Mart stores.
"Over 70 percent of the respondents to a recent survey reported that they are required to take more work home with them from the workplace than they were in the past. Since Valu-Mart has not seen impressive sales in its office-supply departments in the past, we should take advantage of this work-at-home trend by increasing at all Valu-Mart stores the stock of home office machines such as printers, small copy machines, paper shredders, and fax machines. We will also increase stock of office supplies such as paper, pens, and staplers. With these changes, our office-supply departments will become the most profitable component of our stores."
WORDS: 558 TIME: 0:52:09 DATE: 2007-1-10
In this argument, the arguer claims that the Valu-Mart stores should increase the stock of home office machines and office supplies at all their stores due to a survey which shows a work-at-home trend. And the arguer further asserts, with the changes, office-supply departments will become the most profitable component of their stores. There are several flaws in this argument which make it unstable.
Firstly, no evidence shows the survey from which the arguer sees a work-at-home trend is statistically reliable. We could ask a host of questions, such as who conducted the survey? When was the survey conducted? How many people take part in the survey? Can the respondents of the survey be representative of the overall employees? The reliability of the survey depend on the answers to the questions above, and without such answers, the arguer can not say for sure that there is truly a work-at-home trend.
Secondly, even if there is truly a work-at-home trend, we can not say for sure that the demand in office machine and office supplies will increase. The survey does not tell us what kind of work is required to do at home. Maybe the employees are just required to do some background information searching and material reading, which hardly need a pen or a piece of paper not to say printers or copy machines. And the arguer does not tell us whether the employees can do less work in the office. If that is true, maybe the consumption of office machine and office supplies will remain constant.
Thirdly, even if the demand in office machine and office supplies indeed increase, the arguer fails to convince me that the customers would prefer the product of Valu-Mart to the product of other companies, and buy the product of Valu-Mart rather than others'. The arguer assumes that the poor sales in office-supply department is due to the lack of need, but provides no evidence to support it. There may be other reason for the bad sales. Perhaps the sales people of the store are bad-mannered that the costumers feel sick and refuse to buy our product. And probably the office machine and office supplies Valu-Mart sells are old-fashioned or bad in quality. And it is possible that Valu-Mart sells its Office machine and office supplies at extremely high price which hardly any customer can afford. Without ruling out other possible factors that may affect the sales the arguer can not make me believe the sales will necessarily increase after they increase the stock according to the work-at-home trend.
Fourthly, even if sales of office machine and office supplies of Valu-Mart increased, the office-supply department of Valu-Mart will not necessarily become the most profitable component of the stores. The profit depends on the cost and the revenue. Maybe the revenue of the office-supply department indeed increase by selling more goods, but they may pay more money as bonus to the employees, cost more to stock the goods, and spend more on management. Assuming the profit of the office-supply department has increased, we are not sure if it can become the most profitable department, for the arguer does provide any information about other department of Valu-Mart.
In conclusion, basing the conclusion on a doubtable survey and failing to establish several cause-effect relationships, the arguer can not persuade me to believe the conclusion he made. |
|