issue50 天下无G 第一次限时成功....导致分析得比较粗

lindorUID: 2290025

TOPIC: ISSUE50 - "In order to improve the quality of instruction at the college and university level, all faculty should be required to spend time working outside the academic world in professions relevant to the courses they teach."
WORDS: 524          TIME: 0:45:00          DATE: 2007-2-23

Whether or not all faculty should work outside the academic world in professions relevant to the courses they teach for a period of time to improve the quality of instruction? I concede all faculties should stay abreast of current tendency relevant to the courses they teach; however, it is unnecessary and ineffective for all of them to work outside for the purpose of improving the quality of instruction.

Admittedly, with the increasing globalization and rapid developments in any field of the contemporary world, the old ages when teachers could depend on what books write and kept away from outside are obsolete. Human's society is experiencing momentous exchanges both in cultural customs and the way of thinking. Since young students always lead the latest trend, it is better for teachers to improve instruction by knowing students' characteristics and what they need most.  Thereby, working outside for some time can benefit faculties to get familiar with the current world outside the labs and books.

Moreover, for faculties in certain fields, engineer and application alike, it is necessary to know how principles and theories put into practice, and thus teachers can effectively impress students with accurate information and real experiences as well as provide them guidance for career.  For example, as a computer teacher, if she/he has experiences of working at a software company, he/she is more possible to know the newest technical progresses and the market demand and supply recently, which are useful for students to decide on which their concentration should focus.

However, it is irrational to extend the assertion that working outside is useful to embrace that all faculty should work outside. On the one hand, teachers in some respects would benefit more from doing research in a relative quite and pure environment than working outside. A case of teachers who teach classical literature can illustrate this point.

On the other hand, there are not enough job opportunities for faculty majoring in some courses. Given the economy undergoes a recession, when numerous employees would have trouble in finding a job, teachers would also feel difficult to get a job relevant to the courses they teach, especially for those whose courses are cold ones, such as environment detection. Even if the economy is thriving, some majors are still hard to find a job because their demand from market is limited. In this case, many of teachers would switch to an easier and hotter major, and this could cause severe imbalance in all aspects of courses and would eventually harmful to provide a comprehensive university and college for our society.

In addition, how long should they work outside is hard to determine. As each subject becomes more complex, working outside in a short period would learn quite few on this subject. For instance, a person would cost at least 5 years to become a skilled software engineer. If faculties waste long time to work outside but gain little, the quality of instruction would hardly be improved.

In general, some faculty would benefit from working outside to improve their instruction level; however, in most respects, it is not feasible and efficient for all faculties to work outside.

jacanaUID: 2292520

Whether or not all faculty should work outside the academic world in professions relevant to the courses (after?)they teach for a period of time to improve the quality of instruction? I concede all faculties(faculty) should stay abreast of current tendency relevant to the courses they teach; however, it is unnecessary and ineffective for all of them to work outside for the purpose of improving the quality of instruction.

Admittedly, with the increasing globalization and rapid developments in any field of the contemporary world, the old ages when teachers could depend on what books write and kept away from outside are obsolete. Human's society is experiencing momentous exchanges(?) both in cultural customs and the way of thinking. Since young students always lead the latest trend, it is better for teachers to improve instruction by knowing students' characteristics and what they need most.  Thereby, working outside for some time can benefit faculties to get familiar with the current world outside the labs and books.
这段的逻辑不太顺~

Moreover, for faculties in certain fields, engineer and application alike, it is necessary to know how principles and theories put into practice, and thus teachers can effectively impress students with accurate information and real experiences as well as provide them guidance for career.  For example, as a computer teacher, if she/he has experiences of working at a software company, he/she is more possible to know the newest technical progresses and the market demand and supply recently, which are useful for students to decide on which their concentration should focus.

However, it is irrational to extend the assertion that working outside is useful to embrace that all faculty should work outside. On the one hand, teachers in some respects would benefit more from doing research in a relative quite and pure environment than working outside. A case of teachers who teach classical literature can illustrate this point. 这里最好能展开一点，不然跟下面一段也不平衡

On the other hand, there are not enough job opportunities for faculty majoring in some courses. Given the economy undergoes a recession, when numerous employees would have trouble in finding a job, teachers would also feel difficult to get a job relevant to the courses they teach, especially for those whose courses are cold ones, such as environment detection. Even if the economy is thriving, some majors are still hard to find a job because their demand from market is limited. In this case, many of teachers would switch to an easier and hotter major, and this could cause severe imbalance in all aspects of courses and would eventually harmful to provide a comprehensive university and college for our society.
教授因为工作不好找所以就换专业，这也太武断了吧……

In addition, how long should they work outside is hard to determine. As each subject becomes more complex, working outside in a short period would learn quite few on this subject. For instance, a person would cost at least 5 years to become a skilled software engineer. If faculties waste long time to work outside but gain little, the quality of instruction would hardly be improved.

In general, some faculty would benefit from working outside to improve their instruction level; however, in most respects, it is not feasible and efficient for all faculties to work outside.

词汇很强啊，词组也很漂亮。 body最后两段有点故意找茬的感觉，没有跟问题密切相连

lindorUID: 2290025

看来还是不能一开始把所有的段落的开头句先摆好..

lindorUID: 2290025

每当好处很显而易见的时候,就不知道到底好在哪里了...,还要想半天...

In contemporary society, almost all colleges and universities share a goal of improving the quality of instruction. Under this sphere, a controversy arises on the issue whether all faculty spend time working outside the academic world in professions relevant to the courses they teach will help to approach this goal. As far as I concerned, with respect to certain majors, this way is unavailable and unnecessary. As to other majors, the experience brought from working outside the academic world can contribute directly to the quality of instruction.

Since our society undergoes immense exchanges in several aspects, including the ways of thinking and the requirements of job markets, faculties are beginning to realize the importance of keeping abreast of the current real world. It is well acknowledged that teachers, who are out-of-date, would be unpopular among students, let alone imparting students useful and correct knowledge. On the contrary, faculties combined their academic background and work experiences can bring classes the latest information and the factual situation of job markets relevant to the courses they teach, which will exert an essential influence on students for determining their careers. Besides, being involved in projects outside the academic world, a faculty would come to classes with a contagious enthusiasm on the courses, and thereby sparking students’ interests on this subject.

Moreover, faculties would also benefit from working outside. It is a common sense that knowledge in books is likely to turn out to be partial or even false. Working outside, which requires putting what learned into practice, can help faculties to master more accurate and applicable knowledge to lift their academic levels, and in turn, instilling these experiences and skills to students. Additionally, in the process of working outside, faculties can find a promising research task to their students. After assiduous work of faculties and students, the result of this task could benefit our society to a great extent, and repay those faculties and students high reputation. An empirical instance can illustrate this point. Professors in Stanford University majored in Computer Science always have intense association with companies in the Silicon Valley to gain inspiration on their particular subjects.

However, it is irrational to extend the assertion that working outside is useful to embrace that all faculty should work outside. On the one hand, teachers in some respects would benefit more from doing research in a relative quite and pure environment than working outside. A case of teachers who teach classical literature can illustrate this point. It is wiser for teachers of classical literature to spend more time on reading masterpieces and eschew the complex real world. On the other hand, there are not enough job opportunities for faculty majoring in certain courses. For example, professors of philosophy or anthropology can hardly find the related job. After all, their researches are too obscure to apply in reality.

In general, some faculty would benefit from working outside to improve their instruction level; however, in most respects, it is not feasible and efficient for all faculties to work outside.

jacanaUID: 2292520

应该是论证逻辑更通顺了吧~~~赫赫

lindorUID: 2290025

发现我以前的话有歧义....
我是说出去工作好或者说有工作经验好, 是一个比较普遍的观念,我也认同,但是好处在哪里,我反而不能清晰的表达出来...
我现在写issue越来越象写argu了