argument171[AW狂人社]第一次作业hqrzd

hqrzdUID: 2260265

In this argument,the author concedes that the bargain brand should expand its business and begin marketing

other low-priced food product as quickly as possible.At the first glance,the author's reasoning seems to be

appealing,while clearly examining the author's reasoning,we will find that it is unconvincing.the argument

contains several facets that are questionable.
  First of all,the first questionable assumption underling this argument that the company has gainesd profit

from their first product of 'Bargain Brand' breakfast cereal is not supported in the argument.The line of

reasoning is that the very low prices have quickly drew many customers away from the top selling cereal

companies,But this is fallacious reasoning unless other possible explanation have been considered and ruled

out.lacking evidence to the contrary,it is possible that the company has suffered loss as a result of the

marketing action.yet,no evidence is offered in the argument to dispute this pissibility.
   To begin with secondly,the arguer falsely rests on the gratuitous assumption that the low price is the

cause of a large number of customers attracred from the top selling cereal companies.however,although the

former concides with the latter,it can not establish a general casual relationship between the former and the

latter.Without ruling out other factor or presenting strong evidence,the auther can not conclude that many

customers attracted from other top selling cereal companies is the result of the low prices.Otherwise, the

customer drew from other companies would have gone back to the former ones-if just the result of low prices-

because other he companies producing the top brands have already tried to compete with BB by lowering their

prices and several plans to introduce their own budget brands.It is quite possible that there are other reason

that so many customers are attracted from the top selling companies although low prices strategy is also

proceeding at the same time,such as the taste popular with the public,the food style of various kinds,and even

the service attitude.Thus,a deeper research should be done immediately to find out the accurate cause which is

the most important in for this meno.
   Thirdly,the arguer ignores the vital fact that other low price products introduced by the same company may

have a relation of competition.Even if the first product is successful due to the low price,there is no

assurance that other low-price products also occupy the market in the same way.In the field of developing new

market,the manager should take into accout of the entir circumstance of economy and the condition of the

customers besides low price.
   In conclusion,the argument is pooly supported and is shortsighted.to better evaluate the conclusion that

the bargain brand should expand its business and begin marketing other low-priced food product as quickly as

possible ,we shoule need to ensure that the benefit of the first product is due to low price with the

assumption that the company has gained profit.Moreover,the author must consider other factors  to make the

decision of expanding its business.

小勺子的反思UID: 2280216

In this argument, the author concedes that the bargain brand should expand its business and begin marketing

other low-priced food product as quickly as possible. At the first glance ,t he author's reasoning seems to be

appealing ,while clearly examining the author's reasoning, we will find that it is unconvincing .t he argument

contains several facets that are questionable.
  First of all, the first questionable assumption underling this argument that the company has gainesd [gained] profit

from their first product of 'Bargain Brand' breakfast cereal is not supported in the argument .T he line of

reasoning is that the very low prices have quickly drew many customers away from the top selling cereal

companies, But this is fallacious reasoning unless other possible explanation have been considered and ruled

out .lacking evidence to the contrary ,it is possible that the company has suffered loss as a result of the

marketing action. Ye t,no  evidence is offered in the argument to dispute this possibility[possibility ].
   To begin with secondly [secondly ], the arguer falsely rests on the gratuitous assumption that the low price is the

cause of a large number of customers attracred [attracted]from the top selling cereal companies. however, although the

former concides [concede ]with the latter, it can not establish a general casual relationship between the former and the

latter. Without ruling out other factor or presenting strong evidence, the auther [author] can not conclude that many

customers attracted from other top selling cereal companies is the result of the low prices. Otherwise, the

customer drew from other companies would have gone back to the former ones-if just the result of low prices-

because other he companies producing the top brands have already tried to compete with BB by lowering their

prices and several plans to introduce their own budget brands. It is quite possible that there are other reason

that so many customers are attracted from the top selling companies although low prices strategy is also

proceeding at the same time, such as the taste popular with the public, the food style of various kinds, and even

the service attitude[就是SERVICE]. Thus, a deeper research should be done immediately to find out the accurate cause which is

the most important in for this meno.
   Thirdly, the arguer ignores the vital fact that other low price products introduced by the same company may

have a relation of competition. Even if the first product is successful due to the low price, there is no

assurance that other low-price products also occupy the market in the same way. In the field of developing new

market, t he manager should take into accout [account] of the entir [entire]circumstance of economy and the condition of the

customers besides low price.
   In conclusion, the argument is pooly [poorly ] supported and is short sighted. to better evaluate the conclusion that

the bargain brand should expand its business and begin marketing other low-priced food product as quickly as

possible ,we shoule[should] need to ensure that the benefit of the first product is due to low price with the

assumption that the company has gained profit. Moreover, the author must consider other factors  to make the

decision of expanding its business.


评 ：还是要注意书写。
     大体的错误都是出来了 ，但是攻击可以更丰满
     可以多点点反例 ，而不是老讲你犯了什么错 ，什么错 。
     专业的批的语言还可以哦
     我们一起努力哈

还有一个提纲呢~~?

[ 本帖最后由 小勺子的反思 于 2007-3-6 17:40 编辑 ]