issue144 [AWB小组] 第七次作业

dennis1230UID: 2247126

TOPIC: ISSUE144 - "It is the artist, not the critic,* who gives society something of lasting value."
*a person who evaluates works of art, such as novels, films, music, paintings, etc.
WORDS: 471          TIME: 限时未成功
1 艺术家在不断地创造着新的艺术形式，和价值 Beethoven Michalangelo, Dali Shakespeare
2 批评家的存在帮助我们理解艺术作品，鉴别出不良的作品  提出优秀的作品 Pulitzer Prize
批评家的存在客观上能够促进艺术的进步，激发艺术家的创造力
3 批评家的存在使得艺术家们必须不断提高，艺术家们的作品也相应的起着甄别批评家鉴别能力的作用

It is an eternal argument between the artist and the critic that who gives the really lasting value to society. And the speaker believes it is just the artist, not the critic who makes contribute on society development, but, I do not very support the conclusion. There are inviolable functions from each of them, so that a coexistent between them will be the best way to our modern society.

First of all, as we known, Artists continually create the fruits in any of domain in order to accomplish their own recognized and improvement, while furnishing the world of human's mind. The creating process needs artists strongly emotions, passion and creative impulse as the determinants of success. One can obsess with the melody of Beethoven, enjoys in the ceiling of Sistine Chapel produced by Michelangelo, linger with the paintings by Dali and satisfies the story of Romeo and Julie. All the imitate creatures come from the outstanding artists and actually become the significant contribution on history of human beings. Without the working by such masters, unfortunately, one's mind would be simple and only left with basic needs. In the sense, the artist plays an irreplaceable role in no matter when the times are.

However, it is not wise if we ignore the great benefit from the critic, because the existence of the critic provides a way of differentiating artistry. The critic help people to formulate a system-judge and note what kinds of art are benefical to the person’s development and the progress of society. Pulitzer Price is a sound example. Annual a group of critics holds a commendation on the produces handed up, and determines which one has the most significant meaning or open influence. The critics objectively give persons a guide to obtain the more valuable knowledge and information. If there were not Pulitzer Price and other critic institution, some of people, even most of them would fail to gain the opportunity to feel spirit of the best writers. Meanwhile, the existence of critics not only impromptus the art, but also inspires the artist's creature.

Last but not the least, the critic, to some degree, is as important as the artist. For instance, when a creature is creating, the artist-not like to be critic-has to improve the quality of his/her work, while the critics who always have their own regulation and goals will suspiciously look over the works. This objectively produces an evaluation to works of art, such as novels, films, paintings and so forth. In this rapid development of era, the human's civilization cannot get a great advance unless both critics and artist work together.

In sum, without each of them, our society will suffer from a large amount of questions and eventually leads to confuse on culture. So, it is necessary to make emphasis on both artists and critics.

bloodwinnerUID: 2293757

It is an eternal argument between the artist and the critic that who gives the really lasting value to society. And the speaker believes it is just the artist, not the critic who makes contribute(contributions) on society development, but, I do not very support the conclusion. There are inviolable functions from each of them, so that a coexistent between them will be the best way to our modern society.

First of all, as we known(know), Artists continually create the fruits in any of(去掉of) domain(domains) in order to accomplish their own recognized and improvement, while furnishing the world of human's mind. The creating process needs artists strongly emotions, passion and creative impulse as the determinants of success. One can obsess(be obsessed) with the melody of Beethoven, enjoys(enjoy himself) in the ceiling of Sistine Chapel produced by Michelangelo, linger with the paintings by Dali and (be)satisfies(satisfied with) the story of Romeo and Julie. All the imitate(模仿的？or vivid ?) creatures come from the outstanding artists and actually become the significant contribution on(to) history of human beings. Without the working by such masters, unfortunately, one's mind would be simple and only left with basic needs. In the(this) sense, the artist plays an irreplaceable role in(去掉in) no matter when the times are.

However, it is not wise if we ignore the great benefit from the critic, because the existence of the critic provides a way of differentiating artistry. The critic help people to(去掉to) formulate a system-judge and note what kinds of art are benefical to the person’s development and the progress of society. Pulitzer Price is a sound example. Annual(annually) a group of critics holds(hold) a commendation on the produces(products) handed up, and determines which one has the most significant meaning or open influence. The critics objectively give persons a guide to obtain the more valuable knowledge and information. If there were not Pulitzer Price and other critic institution, some of people, even most of them would fail to gain the opportunity to feel spirit of the best writers. Meanwhile, the existence of critics not only impromptus(impel) the art, but also inspires the artist's creature.

Last but not the(去掉the) least, the critic, to some degree, is as important as the artist. For instance, when a creature is creating(is being created), the artist-not like to be critic(not likely the critic)-has to improve the quality of his/her work, while the critics who always have their own regulation and goals will suspiciously look over the works. This objectively produces an evaluation to works of art, such as novels, films, paintings and so forth. In this rapid development of(去掉of) era, the human's civilization cannot get a great advance unless both critics and artist work together.

In sum, without each of them, our society will suffer from a large amount of questions and eventually leads to confuse(confusion) on culture. So, it is necessary to make emphasis on both artists and critics.

语法问题要注意