Issue69 [mettle小组]第四次作业

yaoqian0424UID: 2323517

------题目------
Government should place few, if any, restrictions on scientific research and development
------正文------
The speaker asserts that Government should lay as few as possible restrictions on scientific research and development, that means, try to make scientific research go wherever it prefers. However, the speaker overlooks the demerits which will occur owning to the extreme freedom of scientific research. Through comprehensive analysis of the advantages and disadvantages of free-chosen in scientific investigation, to my point of view, Government should guide the scientific research to gain benefits of human beings as a whole.

As we all know, the progresses in scientific research and development have greatly contributed to human culture and social evolution, which were widely viewed as a basic principle of social change.  For example, the invention of telephone as well as the recently appeared mobile phone, have made the mutual communication more convenience and efficient among people. While taking into account the benefits brought by the scientific research, we should agree that the scientists ought to have more room to make free choice to the subjects they are really interested in and good at to optimize their inspiration to engaging in research. For that matter, they will further the development of human beings through constant and struggling endeavor leaded by their passion on the realm they truly loved. Were the scientists guide by compulsory force from government to the subjects they do not intent to involve, no far-reaching and fruitful outcomes will expected to be carried out.

In addition, we can see that each branch of scientific circle develops norms and regulations, which specify how its special functions are to be carried out and ensure the right direction of the research, that are comprehensively held by other scientist all over the world. And those who break such norms will be surely denounced and segregated by the other scientists. For instance, the investigation of the human cloning in medical technology was forbidden due to its vital impact on the ethic and moral. Similarly, the research in nuclear weapon announced by the government will affirmatively cause the global opposition and then will be difficult to carry on. Hence, considering the spontaneous restrictions in scientific circle, government should leave room for scientific research to go out of its way to access to accomplishment without placing many restrictions on it which, otherwise, will probably counterproductive. The following case can be a good example to illustrate this point. The European countries during Middle Age, constrained the development of science to maintain their dominion on people and slaughtered many famous scientists brutally such as Copernicus and Galileo,  which leaded to the immeasurable lose on the scientific history.

However, there will also be adverse consequence if government pays no attention to restricting the scientific research and development. Admittedly, the development in science and technology has also brought about some vital problems to human life. Among which the most obvious and universally awarded one is the environmental problem which is the byproduct of the scientific and technological development. Government is obligate to resolve this problem through political means, which is beyond the power of any scientific institutions, to control and guide the direction of scientific investigation for the sake of human beings as a whole. Otherwise, the people who share the fruits of scientific development will suffer greatly at the same time or sometime in the future as well as the government itself.

Overall, we should access to the conclusion that government should put neither too many nor too few restrictions on scientific research and development. How to deal with this problem is one of the most important tasks of government. In my opinion, however, government should evaluate the merits as well as the demerits of the freedom in scientific research on the criteria of the maximal benefits of human beings, encourage the sound and significant researches and lay restrictions on the ones from which destructive outcomes may occur.

请大家帮我拍拍吧，多谢了

happyhappypigUID: 2342810

The speaker asserts that Government should lay as few as possible restrictions on scientific research and development, that means, try to make scientific research go wherever it prefers. However, the speaker overlooks the demerits which will occur owning to the extreme freedom of scientific research. Through comprehensive analysis of the advantages and disadvantages of free-chosen in scientific investigation, tofrom? my point of view, Government should guide the scientific research to gain benefits of human beings as a whole.开头很简洁，学习学习

As we all know, the progresses in scientific research and development have greatly contributed to human culture and social evolution, which were widely viewed as a basic principle of social change.  For example, the invention of telephone as well as the recently appeared mobile phone, have made the mutual communication more convenience convenient and efficient among people. While when? taking into account the benefits brought by the scientific research, we should agree that the scientists ought to have more room to make free choice to the subjects they are really interested in and good at感觉这个不需要 to optimize their inspiration to engaging in research. For that matter, they will further the development of human beings through constant and struggling endeavor leaded by their passion on the realm they truly loved. Were the scientists guide by compulsory force from government to the subjects they do not intent to involve, no far-reaching and fruitful outcomes will expected to be carried out.个人觉得restriction的意思并不见得就是迫使一些人从事他们不喜欢的工作把，感觉限制的意思更多一点。其实有点不明白究竟怎么样才算在issue当中是严谨的逻辑。

In addition, we can see that each branch of scientific circle develops norms and regulations, which specify how its special functions are to be carried out and ensure the right direction of the research这个不需要, that are comprehensively held by other scientist all over the world.这个定于从句是说norm and regulation的吧，不过放得有点靠后了，而且ts有点长 And those who break such norms will be surely denounced and segregated by the other scientists.这里让我感觉你似乎是在说science本身的发展就会产生一些约束，这样说来岂不是更加不需要government的搅和了吗？ For instance, the investigation of the human cloning in medical technology was forbidden due to its vital impact on the ethic and moral. Similarly, the research in nuclear weapon announced by the government will affirmatively cause the global opposition and then will be difficult to carry on. Hence, considering the spontaneous restrictions in scientific circle, 好像和前面提到的还挺一致，那究竟政府应不应该搅和啊？government should leave room for scientific research to go out of its way to access to accomplishment without placing many restrictions on it which, otherwise, will probably counterproductive. 终于明白你这段意思了。那不是和上一段观点不一致了吗？貌似就不要用 in addition 在开头的说The following case can be a good example to illustrate this point. The European countries during Middle Age时间壮语放句首吧, constrained the development of science to maintain their dominion on people and slaughtered many famous scientists brutally such as Copernicus and Galileo,  which leaded to the immeasurable lose on the scientific history.我觉得例子后面还是加一点论述的好，否则感觉好像话没说完

However, there will also be adverse consequence if government pays no attention to restricting the scientific research and development. Admittedly, the development in science and technology has also brought about some vital problems to human life. Among which丛句前面药用逗号，呵呵 the most obvious and universally awarded貌似是个褒义词？ one is the environmental problem which is the byproduct of the scientific and technological development. Government is obligate to resolve this problem through political means, which is beyond the power of any scientific institutions没看出来这个是哪个词的定语丛据~~~, to control and guide the direction of scientific investigation for the sake of human beings as a whole. Otherwise, the people who share the fruits of scientific development will suffer greatly at the same time or sometime in the future as well as the government itself.感觉这段应该和上面一段对调一下？还是我逻辑混乱了~~~

Overall, we should access to the conclusion that government should put neither too many nor too few restrictions on scientific research and development. How to deal with this problem is one of the most important tasks of government. In my opinion, however好像没有转折关系, government should evaluate the merits as well as the demerits of the freedom in scientific research on the criteria of the maximal benefits of human beings, encourage the sound and significant researches and lay restrictions on the ones from which destructive outcomes may occur.结尾不错，学习学习

我自己的issue写得就不好，所以粗浅的给你改了改，嗬嗬，如有不妥之处，请指正
语言上相当好了，貌似论述的再深入一点会更好。
我现在还没感觉，不瞎说了。
一起加油

yaoqian0424UID: 2323517

提纲：
1,科学的发展给人类的生活带来了巨大的变革。应该给科学家们更多的自由来选择他们感兴趣并擅长的课题，可以最大程度地激发他们的研究热情，为人类的发展做出更多的贡献。
2，而且在科研领域，也有自己的标准和限制条例，来控制科研不会偏离方向，比如在医学界禁止人类的克隆，防治破坏道德伦理，再如公开的核武器研究也会遭到全世界人民的反对，而难以继续下去。因此政府应该为科学研究保留一定自由发展的空间，不能加以过多的限制，否则可能影响其发展甚至阻碍它的发展，比如中世纪的欧洲国家，为了维护自己的统治，限制自然科学的发展，迫害了一大批像哥白尼，伽利略这样的伟大科学家，使科学的脚步停滞不前。
3，但是政府要是不加限制任其自由发展也会出现很多不良的后果，比如在技术发展物质文明进步的同时所产生的环境污染非常严重，只有政府有能力进一步限制可能产生环境问题的科研，并引导其向有利的方向发展。

确实存在很多简单的语法错误和逻辑错误，感觉在逻辑条理上，还不够清晰，应多加些限定词帮助理解。我会参考你的意见再好好修改的，多谢了！！