- 最后登录
- 2008-5-9
- 在线时间
- 0 小时
- 寄托币
- 192
- 声望
- 0
- 注册时间
- 2007-8-1
- 阅读权限
- 15
- 帖子
- 0
- 精华
- 0
- 积分
- 150
- UID
- 2373668

- 声望
- 0
- 寄托币
- 192
- 注册时间
- 2007-8-1
- 精华
- 0
- 帖子
- 0
|
When asked whether it is right to develop a global university in solving the world's most persistent social problems, it is , surely, difficult to arrive to a consensus due to the different experience and conflicting values. As far as i am concerned, although there are lots of experiences on tough social problems for some nations to learn from others, i still hold a negative point on this issue.
First of all, the intrusive problem that disrupting most nations are the national right and terrestrial integrity, which varies from nations and it is almost impossible to develop a global university in the aim of solving it. As many other countries, the headache haunting the Chinese government is the terrestrial integrity problem, caused by Taiwan.( As we Chinese know, Taiwan Island is a part of China hundreds of years ago from Ming Dynasty. But due to the history problem from civil war before 1949 and the far-reaching Taiwan strait, the government in Taiwan, especially some leaders in Democracy Party, insist on denying the fact that Taiwan island is a crucial part of China, both in terrestrial and politics. )--->[Due to Chinaese civil war in 1949 and the far-reaching(?) distance issue, Taiwan,a traditional inner domain of China, has become the more and more indeterminable and unsafty region ,because of the present so-called goverment ,particularly some leader in XX. 觉得这么写好些,反正这个例子用了见光死,除非是大陆去的移民后代]Although the Mainland government hold its unchangeable conclusion that Taiwan Island is one part of China not only in terrestrial but politics, the situation becomes complicated by the swaging attitude from the United States and the disrupting force of Japan. Most nations do not agree to give a united-nation seat for Taiwan, therefore some of them are under the command of the United States. In one word, the problem on national right and terrestrial integrity should not be solved by the global university.
[中间首段举例有些controversial, 实在想写这类的可以写科威特和伊拉克阿,那个写了肯定加分,而且论点有争议,no evidence to prove that the global persistant society problem is about nation right and terristrial integrity,not objective]
Additionally, the environmental problem is a serious problem for many countries and because of the different reasons, it is unseemly to establish a global university in solving it. The cause of environmental problems varies from countries. That of the United States mainly focuses on the air pollution caused by automobiles and petrol disseminating industry, while the reason in China lies in the deserting -- over pasturing and deforestation. The economical reasons drive the idle peasants to pasturing on grass land. Sheep and cows devour the grass and the soil is disclosing to surface. The strong wind and even hurricane pull the sand up to the air which causes the sand wind in Beijing. The aggravating sand wind phenomena attracts the government's attention and several suggestions as well as the professional methods are adopted. Different problems happen within different countries. How can the scholars be familiar with the problems of other counties'? And the only way to resolve it is that the government puts much attention on it and receives the suggestion from civilian and professors.
However, I can not draw a presumptuous conclusion that all social problems in a nation should be deal with all by itself. Comparing with the education in the United States, that situation in China is in a primitive state and need much more progress. The administer of the government and teachers in educating can learn a lot of experiences from those in the United States and the progress in China is in our eyes. I cites this example to illustrate that the social problems varies from counties and most them should be resolved by themselves while several ones can learn the experience from outsiders. However, the establishment of a social school is somewhat ridiculous in the situation that the people from other counties are not familiar with the puzzles in ours.
[Do evironment events be belong to the society events or link with it?]
In summary, it is very likely that people are different in background and will never be able to arrive at the same conclusion on this controversial issue. However, taking into account all the dimensions discussed in the above analysis might be a decisive step out of dilemma.
personal idea:
1. not objective, 个人觉得大而范比较安全,society problem is hard to define and the influence of ideology distinguish is sensitive
2. 举例比较controversial and dangerous
3.no keen viewpoint to distill your argument.
我也是鲜虾,很关心这个文章可以打几分? |
|