argument38 [0710G ＋U Aug小组]第16次作业

wm23UID: 2245087

The author draws a conclusion that the absenteeism in West Meria can be reduced by using the lchthaid which is a kind of nutritional supplement derived from fish oil to prevent colds. To support the author's point, the argument provides the evidence that colds are the reason most frequently given for absenteeism, and eat fish can prevent the colds. In addition, the author points out that the residents in nearby East Meria, who often eat fish are almost not visiting doctor for colds to support the argument. However, the argument suffers several fallacies, which renders it unacceptable.

First of all, the author fails to point out the definite proof which can prove the fish can prevent colds. The author only indicates in East Meria, the residents consume fish in a large amount, and they are hardly visiting doctor for colds. The author obliviously makes an assumption that lack of evidence. That the residents almost do not visit the doctor for colds may have other reasons, for example, they do not consider the colds as a serious illness and usually overlook it, or the residents in East Meria often take part in physical exercise and obtain a good physical quality so that they could hardly get colds. Consequently, the relationship between fish and colds preventing can not be proved by valid evidence.

Secondly, the author asserts the fact that colds is the excuse most frequently given for absenteeism, which prove the best way to lower the ratio of absenteeism is preventing colds. However, the author fails to show us strong evidence to indicate the certain relationship between colds and absenteeism. Colds often given as an excuse for absenteeism cannot prove the colds is main reason of high ratio of absenteeism. For example, people apply for absenteeism, which may not because they get colds, but because they want to do other things that they are not willing to tell other people and colds is just a lie. Hence, it cannot be assured that the ratio of absenteeism will be reduce by prevent colds.

Last but not least, the author recommends the residents of West Meria take the lchthaid which is a nutritional supplement derived from fish oil to prevent the colds. However, we cannot convince the recommendation even though we assume that eating fish can prevent the colds. Obviously, it is impossible that all kinds of fish can prevent the colds; hence, it cannot convince us by the fact that the author just tells us the lchthaid derived from fish oil. The author’s assertion is too vague,. Which kinds of fish is the nutritional supplement deriving from? And does this kind of fish has effect of preventing colds? The author has to answer those questions to convince us believe that the lchthaid can prevent colds.

In conclusion, the argument is unreasonable as it stands. To strengthen the argument, the author has to provide more evidences which can prove the ratio of absenteeism is really caused by colds, and a certain kind of fish has effect of preventing colds. To better evaluate the argument, the author should demonstrate that lchthaid has been proved to be truly effective in preventing colds.

ddbearUID: 2275294

The author draws a conclusion that the absenteeism in West Meria can be reduced by using the lchthaid which is a kind of nutritional supplement derived from fish oil to prevent colds. To support the author's point, the argument provides the evidence that colds are the reason most frequently given for absenteeism, and eat fish can prevent the colds. In addition, the author points out that the residents in nearby East Meria, who often eat fish are almost not visiting doctor for colds to support the argument. However, the argument suffers several fallacies, which renders it unacceptable.

First of all, the author fails to point out the definite proof which can prove the fish can prevent colds. The author only indicates in East Meria, the residents consume fish in a large amount, and they are hardly visiting doctor for colds. The author obliviously makes an assumption that lack of evidence（读着有点别扭？是从模版里找的么？我没见过这么说的呢）. That the residents almost do not visit the doctor for colds may have other reasons, for example, they do not consider the colds as a serious illness and usually overlook it, or the residents in East Meria often take part in physical exercise and obtain a good physical quality so that they could hardly get colds. Consequently, the relationship between fish and colds preventing can not be proved by valid evidence.

Secondly, the author asserts the fact that colds is the excuse most frequently given for absenteeism, which prove the best way to lower the ratio of absenteeism is preventing colds. However, the author fails to show us strong evidence to indicate the certain relationship between colds and absenteeism. Colds often given as an excuse for absenteeism cannot prove the colds is 单数？ main reason of high ratio of absenteeism. For example, people apply for absenteeism, which may not because they get colds, but because they want to do other things that they are not willing to tell other people and colds is just a lie. Hence, it cannot be assured that the ratio of absenteeism will be reduce by prevent colds.

Last but not least, the author recommends the residents of West Meria take the lchthaid which is a nutritional supplement derived from fish oil to prevent the colds. However, we cannot convince the recommendation even though we assume that eating fish can prevent the colds. Obviously, it is impossible that all kinds of fish can prevent the colds; hence, it cannot convince us by the fact that the author just tells us the lchthaid derived from fish oil. The author’s assertion is too vague,. Which kinds of fish is the nutritional supplement deriving from? And does this kind of fish has effect of preventing colds? The author has to answer those questions to convince us believe that the lchthaid can prevent colds.

In conclusion, the argument is unreasonable as it stands. To strengthen the argument, the author has to provide more evidences which can prove the ratio of absenteeism is really caused by colds, and a certain kind of fish has effect of preventing colds. To better evaluate the argument, the author should demonstrate that lchthaid has been proved to be truly effective in preventing colds（再看一下范文，这个句型使用的话，主句主语应该是I）.

很不错！结构很完整了！句子也比以前好~  加油！