|
The speaker claims that it is not the critic, but the artist, gives society something of lasting value. In my standpoint, I primarily agree this assertion because the lasting value of the art work such as the relaxing, expressing the passion and insight, reflecting the humanity, improve humans lives.(这句话有问题)
(首段没有明确亮出自己观点,是artist还是critic)
To begin with, the oldest definition of the function of the arts is that they provide pleasure and relaxing when people feel tension, depression and distress in their work, study or other aspects. Common sense informs us that listening to the music is the best way to cure our psychological pains. Enya, who is a worldwide famous singer, is attractive to her singing career and the reason why she is so attractive and concentrated all public's eyes is due to her sound of nature. Enya's work pacifies people's mind away from a rapid pace way of life and a negative emotion, the same time releasing and bringing a pleasure to them.
Meanwhile, the arts also can be devoted as "expressionism"- the artist use of a medium to express unique passion and insight. Receptors-those who are favor of the arts-will obtaindulcet events from the artist's work. The pianist named Franz Liszt, for instance, in the 1830s to 1840 screated a public personality as the great piano virtuoso of the era. The motion acted by Liszt mainly advocates the romanticism as aculture of the music. Similar to what mentioned above, in China, a famous poem "LiqingZhao" in ancient time often wrote a lot of poesies to express infinite love and missing to her beloved, moreover, such graceful and sharpens love are still cited by Chinese to show love to someone else.
Furthermore, some narrative arts instruct people to some extent. These works reflect the human character. Retrospect human's history, Renaissance painting of a Madonna and Angels, for many veiwers, is somehow a revelation of transcendent spirituality; a Beethovensymphonyis the last word on human endurance; Shakespeare's Macbeth teaches us that inordinate ambition is pernicious. By knowing this, people can conclude and learn the set of principles of humanity so as to improve themselves inmoral and human nature.
However, the fact that critics also seem to give a society something lasting value should never be neglected. In the first place, they discover some outstanding arts works and help the public to realize and comprehend works with a right point of view. Yet, critics acted a negative factor, in most cases, to prevent the development of the arts. Since these critics' thoughts were restricted by such as conception, belief, even the government, they cannot draw a justifiable, objective and reasonable comment on arts works. Take Van Gogh as an example, his art can reflected problems and phenomenon of a society. One of his most famous works called potato reflect the misery and poverty of humanity a she saw it among the miners in Belgium. What a pity is that there was no tany critics in contemporaneity recognize the value of Van Gogh's works. Thus, critics effort more negative factors than their benefits to the society.
In conclusion, from what has been discussed above, the assertion from my opinion is that the artist gives the society more lasting value and influence human's daily lives, while the critic's work is failed in most aspects, though some good effect should be recognize.
感觉偏题有点严重,观点不鲜明。
[ 本帖最后由 yt-sophia 于 2008-4-5 00:23 编辑 ] |