issue69

lisheng19881108UID: 2358622

issue69

Government should place few, if any, restrictions on scientific research and development.
限时
When asked about that whether government should place few restrictions on scientific research and development, people may find it hard to come to consensus due to their different experience and position. The speaker thinks that government should place few, if any, restrictions on scientific research and development, while some others think not. From my perspective, I partially agree with the speaker.

No one can deny that the advantages of research and development are important to human beings. With the advanced technology, our society is developed quickly. Depending on the advantages of research and development, people are living a convenient life and save time at the same time. For example, we can transfer to other countries through the advanced transformation easily, but if we do not have the research and development, we may only dream other countries but never arrive at them. In addition, the advantages of research and development also create profits to our country. So we know, not only the citizens but also our country all connects with research and development.

Few restrictions on scientific research and development will let people develop and promote the level of science easily. In this way, scientists will do their best to the development of technology and they can achieve their goals. Jonestrone, president and CEO of MAT, a distinguished and well-known company in Massachusetts, illustrates this brilliantly in the following quotes (and I paragraph)," Only when the government place few restrictions on scientific research and development, the scientists can do their most contributions to our country." For instance, in Bruno's era, many people believed that the earth was the center of the universe. Regardless of a long period of imprisonment, Bruno claimed that the universe is infinite, which outraged the religious community, and Bruno was sentenced to death eventually. For few restrictions on scientific research and development, the scientists may contribute to their country more easily.

Scientific research and development can be a double-edged sword over human beings. If not properly controlled, it brought disasters to us. Although scientific research has produced substantial social benefits, it has also posed several troubling ethical problems. Public attention was drawn to reported abuses of human subjects in biomedical experiments, especially during the Second World War. The physicians and scientists who had conducted biomedical experiments on concentration camp prisoners were judged guilty in trials. What's more, clone is thought to be quite promising in gene savings. However, human cloning is not only dangerous technically but also perilous to the morality and ethics, thus many people call for to banning human cloning for reproductive purposes and even any purpose. Nevertheless, some scientists, in spite of moral and ethical standards, insist on doing experiments on cloning humans stealthily. Above this, the disadvantages of research and development are also very clearly, so our government also should take some measures on scientific research and development.

To sum up, due to the aforementioned reasons, which sometimes intertwine to form an organic whole and thus become more persuasive than any single of them, we may safely arrive at the conclusion that government should place some restrictions on scientific research and development when it is necessarily.

DemiquaverUID: 203651

还真被我猜准了，开头结尾是个模板;)

文章论述结构和我的那篇差不多，看来我们想到一块儿去了。

有一点值得探讨：个人觉得scientific research and development和technology是有区别的。文章要论述的是前者，你的这篇文章的一些例子提到的是technology的好处，不知是否有影响。

您的这位Jonestrone够神奇的呀，每篇文章里他都能插上一句话！;d:

其他问题直接改在文章里。

个人拙见！

When asked about that whether government should place few restrictions on scientific research and development, people may find it hard to come to consensus due to their different experience and position. The speaker thinks that government should place few, if any, restrictions on scientific research and development, while some others think not. From my perspective, I partially agree with the speaker.

No one can deny that the advantages of research and development are important to（for） human beings. With the advanced technology, our society is developed quickly. Depending on the advantages of research and development（应该把scientific写出来，research 和 development有好多种呢）, people are living a convenient life and save time at the same time. For example, we can transfer to other countries through the advanced transformation easily, but if we do not have the research and development, we may only dream other countries（？？？） but never arrive at them. In addition, the advantages of research and development also create profits to our country. （何以体现，若无论证，这句话还不如不加）So we know, not only the citizens but also our country all connects with research and development.

Few restrictions on scientific research and development will let people develop and promote the level of science easily. In this way, scientists will do their best to the development of technology and they can achieve their goals. Jonestrone, president and CEO of MAT, a distinguished and well-known company in Massachusetts, illustrates this brilliantly in the following quotes (and I paragraph)," Only when the government place few restrictions on scientific research and development, the scientists can do their most contributions to our country." For instance, in Bruno's era, many people believed that the earth was the center of the universe. Regardless of a long period of imprisonment, Bruno claimed that the universe is infinite, which outraged the religious community, and Bruno was sentenced to death eventually. （这个例子好像没有充分证明restriction on research的害处啊）For few restrictions on scientific research and development, the scientists may contribute to their country more easily.

Scientific research and development can be a double-edged sword over human beings. If not properly controlled, it brought（过去时？） disasters to us. Although scientific research has produced substantial social benefits, it has also posed several troubling ethical problems. Public attention was drawn to reported abuses of human subjects in biomedical experiments, especially during the Second World War. The physicians and scientists who had conducted biomedical experiments on concentration camp（学习了，原来集中营是这么说的） prisoners were judged guilty in trials. What's more, clone is thought to be quite promising in gene savings. However, human cloning is not only dangerous technically but also perilous to the morality and ethics, thus many people call for to banning（to ban？） human cloning for reproductive purposes and even any purpose. Nevertheless, some scientists, in spite of moral and ethical standards, insist on doing experiments on cloning humans stealthily. Above this, the disadvantages of research and development are also very clearly, so our government also should take some measures（什么measure？是restriction吗？不能让读者去猜啊） on scientific research and development.

To sum up, due to the aforementioned reasons, which sometimes intertwine to form an organic whole and thus become more persuasive than any single of them, we may safely arrive at the conclusion that government should place some restrictions on scientific research and development when it is necessarily.