IMPULSE小组作业周5作业

kturyUID: 2274868

2007年8月4日
独立：你同不同意说印刷书在二十年后将不复存在...（周五作业）

The rapid development of technology inaugurate a new era, changing people's living habits. Some people hold that the electronic book will replace the print book. Others herald the print book which is the one never be substituted. As far as I am concerned, I support the first opinion since the fast progress of technology, and the great pollution caused by paper factories and economic use of resources.

To begin with, the advanced technology has produced the electronic book. With the help of internet and network, people have read novels or news on computers or Mobil phones. Some of the web sites have offered large resources such as the famous novels and classic pomes for the public to download. These resources may cost a little money or even free for the public readers. Although a part of people do not have the idea to operate these new machines, yet as the technology progress, the operation will be more smart and easier is undeniable. Furthermore, the electronic book provides lots of convenience to the readers, For example, reading at night is impossible without the lights, yet electronic books have overcome this difficult. Moreover, some old people have the difficult to read the normal size words printed on books; but could read large size words on the electronic books which could be expanded easily.

Secondly, the great pollution caused by paper production and print could diminish, if the public do not need the print books. According to the relevant research, paper production reliving waste water is the most negative factory. However, the electronic book is gradually taking the place of print books. If the electric books could be used broadly, it is not only good for the environment, but also retrench resources consumption.

Last, According to the discussion above, it is necessary and possible that to replace the print books. Although the electric book cannot be accepted by all people at one time, two decades years are long enough for the public to acknowledge its merits. In conclusion, people will drop the print book which is more expensive, less convenience and pollute the environment.

双手的温柔UID: 173110

The rapid development of technology inaugurate [inaugurates] a new era, changing people's living habits. Some people hold that the electronic book will replace the print book. Others herald the print book which is the one never be substituted. As far as I am concerned, I support the first opinion since the fast progress of technology, and the great pollution caused by paper factories and economic use of resources.

To begin with, the advanced technology has produced the electronic book. With the help of internet and network, people have read novels or news on computers or Mobil phones. Some of the web sites have offered large resources such as the famous novels and classic pomes for the public to download. These resources may cost a little money or even free for the public readers. Although a part of people do not have the idea to operate these new machines, yet as the technology progress, the operation will be more smart and easier is undeniable. Furthermore, the electronic book provides lots of convenience to the readers, For example, reading at night is impossible without the lights, yet electronic books have overcome this difficult. Moreover, some old people have the difficult to read the normal size words printed on books; but could read large size words on the electronic books which could be expanded [zoomed in] easily.

Secondly, the great pollution caused by paper production and print could diminish, if the public do not need the print books. According to the relevant research, paper production reliving waste water is the most negative factory [Thanks to the waster water paper production has been recognized as one of the most unenvironmental industry ]. However, the electronic book is gradually taking the place of print books. If the electric books could be used broadly, it is not only good for the environment, but also retrench resources consumption.

Last [To sum up], According to the discussion above, it is necessary and possible that to replace the print books. Although the electric book cannot be accepted by all people at one time, two decades years are long enough for the public to acknowledge its merits. In conclusion, people will drop the print book which is more expensive, less convenience and pollute the environment.

雪羽酒UID: 2515193

我也写了一篇同主题的~ 我们互拍吧!~
https://bbs.gter.net/thread-870336-1-1.html

雪羽酒UID: 2515193

The rapid development of technology inaugurates a new era, changing people's living habits. Some people hold that the electronic book will replace the print book. Others herald the print book which is the one never to be substituted. As far as I am concerned, I support the first opinion since the fast progress of technology, and the great pollution caused by paper factories and economical use of resources.

To begin with, the advanced technology has produced the electronic book. With the help of internet and network, people have read novels or news on computers or Mobil phones(我觉得这句话不要用完成时). Some of the web sites have offered large resources such as the famous novels and classic poems for the public to download. These resources may cost a little money(a little money指一定数量的钱，我觉得用little money更好) or even free for the public readers. Although a part of people do not have the idea to operate these new machines, yet（不知although和yet能连用吗？请指教~） as the technology progress,that(主语从句要加that) the operation will be smarter and easier is undeniable. Furthermore, the electronic book provides lots of convenience to the readers, For example, reading at night is impossible without the lights, yet electronic books have overcome this difficult. Moreover, some old people have the difficult to read the normal size words printed on books; but could read large size words on the electronic books which could be expanded easily.（我觉得这段观点有些散，可以考虑在开头说：高科技能使人们的读书生活更便利，从而人们会放弃印刷书选择电子书）

Secondly, the great pollution caused by paper production and print could diminish, if the public do not need the print books. According to a relevant research, paper production reliving waste water is the most negative factory.（sorry,这句话看不懂...）.  However, the electronic book is gradually taking （the 去掉） place of print books. If the electric books could be used broadly, it will not only be good for the environment, but also retrench resources consumption.(原句中it is 和后面的retrench不搭配)

（Last, ）According to the discussion above, it is necessary and possible （that） to replace the print books. Although the electric books cannot be accepted by all people at one time, two decades (years) are long enough for the public to acknowledge its merits. In conclusion, people will drop the print book which is more expensive, less convenience and pollute the environment.(这句话的is对应第二个短语却不对应第三个，不知有这种用法么？请指教~~）.

建议: 第二个论点最好有例子,比如说我国松花江、太湖的污染是否一部分由此引起呢？

  

      注意主谓的搭配哦~ 我不清楚是否可以根据第二分句的意思来取舍前句的动词。。。

最后，请亲爱的T友也帮忙拍我的吧！地址就在上楼~