寄托天下
查看: 1091|回复: 0

[i习作temp] ISSUE51 [FF小组]第一次作业- by wxpowned [复制链接]

Rank: 2

声望
0
寄托币
111
注册时间
2008-9-6
精华
0
帖子
0
发表于 2008-10-29 04:58:40 |显示全部楼层
  • 之前一直看北美范文和作文大讲堂及GRE作文5.5分备考,都很适合我的。
    动笔之前当然不忘参考各位前辈 佳作,也是获益良多,当然,文章得自己先写好中文提纲,然后一句一句慢慢敲出来,其中有几分艰辛就有几分喜悦,到最后写完真是有种豁然开朗的感觉,我也写完了。呵呵。人品爆发哈。
    废话不多说,真是很庆幸在杀G路上有一群志同道合的人一起鼓励帮助,大家多多指教。毕竟是第一次,水平不敢恭维,大家拍的时候自然也不要手下留情哈。

ISSUE51 - "Education will be truly effective only when it is specifically designed to meet the individual needs and interests of each student."
Words:518. TIME: 2:03:34.

The speaker claims that education will be truly effective only when it is specifically designed to meet the individual needs and interests of each student. It might be

attempting to agree with the speaker on the basis that each student has different needs and interests, and he or she would be totally motivated to study through

a specifically designed education. However, the speaker overlooks the considerable significance of general education and the inherent flaws of the specifically designed

education.

First of all, I do concede that an educational system should take into account the specific needs and interests of each student to fully develop their distinct talent

and potential. After all, the general education does not fit for those quite a few special ones with marvelous genius who achieve his success actually by the

specifically designed education. A convictive example is W.A. Mozart, a child musical prodigy, who became a composer at the age of just six and was finally named

the top musicians. But obviously he could not go this far without his father’s specifically designed education at his early ages. This illustrates the specifically designed

education is truly effective for those extraordinary ones.

However, the speaker arbitrarily asserts that only and just only a specifically designed education will truly benefit each student. This neglects the equal or even greater

importance of general education. Primary and secondary students study the same curriculum from which they get their basic knowledge which eventually acts as a catalyst

for the finding and forming of their interests. What is more, general education brings up the majority of the luminaries. We can take Albert Einstein as a convincing example. The great physicist set up a new era for physics and one of those factors what contribute to his success is his systematic and regular education accepted by him at ordinary school and university. So we can presume that general education is as or even more important as specifically designed education and also truly effective.

Moreover, we could not possibly offer that large number of public resources to meet so many student’s various needs and interests. After all, public resources can not

supply enough teachers and facilities for the students at the existing general education system. How do we design the new education system which precisely reflects

and satisfy each student’s needs and interests is another thorny problem. And this naturally consumes our scarce public resources.To this extent, it is unfeasible for specifically designed education for students all.More importantly, though we differ from each other, and at the same time we are quite similar with each other. So general education which does reflect not only students’ needs and interests but the society’s is actually more effective for the society operation as a whole. In other words, specifically designed education is not truly effective.

In the final analysis, I agree with the speaker insofar as specifically designed education is truly effective for those special ones with distinct talent and potential. However, I hold a strong position that we only need general education for most of our students for the reason that it is truly effective for most students and for the society as a whole.



[ 本帖最后由 wxpowned 于 2008-10-31 02:49 编辑 ]

使用道具 举报

RE: ISSUE51 [FF小组]第一次作业- by wxpowned [修改]

问答
Offer
投票
面经
最新
精华
转发
转发该帖子
ISSUE51 [FF小组]第一次作业- by wxpowned
https://bbs.gter.net/thread-888570-1-1.html
复制链接
发送
回顶部