ISSUE83 我的作业，自己认真改过了。谢谢帮忙！

飞啊~飞UID：2121330

Issue83  
------题目------
Government should preserve publicly owned wilderness areas in their natural state, even though these areas are often extremely remote and thus accessible to only a few people.
1．        保护野地市政府的职责，政府有义务保护所有公民
2．        野地虽然只与部分人直接有关，但影响范围广
3．        考虑到钱的问题，可先解决当务之急同时为保护野地创找条件
------正文------
Should government preserve publicly owned wilderness areas in their natural state even though these areas are often extremely remote and thus accessible to only a few people, as the author asserts? I fundamentally agree with this assertion, since it is government's responsibility to protect it and without proper preservation, the destruction of wilderness areas may bring to a broad adverse effect.

To begin with, one of government's responsibilities is to protect its people.  In other word, government has responsibility to preserve the wilderness areas, which may lead to impact on people's life.  Being accessible to only few people cannot be a reason of refusing preservation of wilderness areas. People related to the wilderness areas have the same right of protection with those who live in cities or other areas. It just likes government should not ignore problems of the handicapped, who is also minority of the population. Moreover, if government did not preserve the wilderness areas, no one else would the interest and the ability to preserve them.

In addition, although wilderness areas are remote and accessible only to a few people, it affects the whole country or even the word as well. For one thing, plants wilderness areas play a pivotal role in weather. Without proper protection, the weather would become extremely bad. For example, because of deforestation in northeast in China, people in all the north of China always suffered heavy wind with dust and dirt. Similarly, without proper protection of the source of Yellow River in wild maintain, she had become dry many times, and people who used utilize the water have to find other water supply.  For another, although wilderness areas are remote, sometimes they have great resources, such like plants, animals and water. If people preserve those areas and make the best use of it, they can also bring great impact on our life. China is developing the program, which makes water in the southwest into electricity in order to relieve the press of electricity in the north big cities like Shenzhen and Guangzhou. To the contrast, if government did not preserve the wilderness areas in the west, big cities in the north would still in the high pressure of electricity. Thus, wilderness areas are worthy to be preserved.

Admittedly, some may argue that there are great many other fields also waiting for finance and government may have insufficient money to make all satisfied. In this case, government should solve the fundamental problems such food supply and social stableness at first, at the same time, make opportunities to prepare for the preservation. In a word, government should not ignore the wilderness areas and the people living on them.

In sum, as all the discussed above, I come to conclude that the government should preserve the wilderness areas, for their effect on the country and the word is broad.
自己觉得例子还要再完善！！

:D

lignumvitaeUID：207532

------正文------
Should government preserve publicly owned wilderness areas in their natural state even though these areas are often extremely remote and thus accessible to only a few people, as the author asserts? I fundamentally agree with this assertion, since it is government's responsibility to protect it， and without proper preservation, the destruction of wilderness areas may bring to a broad adverse effect.

To begin with, one of government's responsibilities is to protect its people.  In other word, government has responsibility to preserve the wilderness areas, which may lead to impact on people's lifelives.  Being accessible to only few people cannot be a reason of refusing preservation of wilderness areas. People related to the wilderness areas have the same right of protection with those who live in cities or other areas. It just likes government should not ignore problems of the handicapped, who is also minority of the population. Moreover, if government did not preserve the wilderness areas, no one else would the interest and the ability to preserve them. 这后半句的动词呢？这一段people那句在中间好象不太连贯

In addition, although wilderness areas are remote and accessible only to a few people, it affects the whole country or even the world as well. For one thing, plants wilderness areas play a pivotal role in weather. Without proper protection, the weather would become extremely bad. For example, because of deforestation in northeast in China, people in all the north of China always suffered heavy wind with dust and dirt. Similarly, without proper protection of the source of Yellow River in wild maintainmaintenance, she had become dry in some sections many times, and people who used utilize 动词重复了嘛the water have to find other water supply.  For another, although wilderness areas are remote, sometimes they have great resources, such like plants, animals and water. If people preserve those areas and make the best use of it, they can also bring great impact on our lifelives. China is developing the program, which makes water in the southwest into electricity in order to relieve the press of electricity in the north big cities like Shenzhen and Guangzhou.这两个词跟在north cities后面，应该与之一致 To the contrast这个用法你确定？一般不是on the contrary, if government did not preserve the wilderness areas in the west, big cities in the north would still in the high pressure of electricity. Thus, wilderness areas are worthy to be preserved. 那个南水北调的例子似乎是解决问题，而非保护wildness areas

Admittedly, some may argue that there are great many other fields also waiting for finance and government may have insufficient money to make all satisfied. In this case, government should solve the fundamental problems such food supply and social stableness at first, at the same time, make opportunities to prepare for the preservation. In a word, government should not ignore the wilderness areas and the people living on them.

In sum, as all the discussed above, I come to conclude that the government should preserve the wilderness areas, for their effect on the country and the world is broad.
自己觉得例子还要再完善！！

思路满清楚的，再加强论证吧！若要互相帮助留言给我好了，+Ｕ

飞啊~飞UID：2121330

life表生活的时候是不可数的,用单数.生命的时候才可数
''used utilize 动词重复了嘛'' 中间掉了一个to,不好意思
南水北调: 我是想说野地如果保护起来的话还很有利用价值. 没说清楚,我再改改