【12月-1月IBT综合备考活动】☆Jelly月♂12月14日作文

d596086UID: 2522476

Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? In university, students should take the history courses no matter what field they study in.

History course, a subject teaches students largely influencing matters in national or international history, is one of the most important basic curriculums in school. In most country, from middle school to high school, it is a compulsory lesson for each student; however, it turns to be an elective course in university, which means students need not take this class no matter what field they study in. I definitely support this objective fact, for it is really reasonable.

First of all, unlike those abstrusely scientific subjects, the history is easier learned, which is totally able to finish studying in middle or high school instead of university. I am a Chinese student, whose country has a very long history. I have touched this major for almost six years before entering into university. Not just national history, I also learned almost every great event all over the world, from ancient to contemporary era. Coming into a history classroom in the university, one can find that most of the content of lesson is the same as which in high school. That means we, the university students, have already learned enough knowledge of history, and do not need further research in this area, except of those history major’s students.

In addition, although the history course is very important or interesting, it is not necessary to force every college students learning it. In another aspect, were anyone who is interested in the history, she or he is easily able to fulfill personal satisfaction in university. One can find numerous history books in school’s library; one can choose one or two history course which is elective; one can also take part in several history speeches listening to famous professors. Unlike high school students, college ones possess strong ability choosing useful and attractive knowledge without exterior force. That is also means that if one who not wants to study history, anybody else should not order he or she accepts this course.

Finally, comparing with other compulsory subjects in university, the history knowledge has less value and little help to the modern society developing; and therefore, its status is reasonable lower than compulsory ones. From some sense, make every student in university to study history is taking their precious time and energy away from major course. As for me, a student in school of computer science, I can hardly list out what kinds of history knowledge can help me finding a decent job in business company, or either helps me accomplish my academic pursuit. Even though I have chosen history course in college, most of time what I am doing in this class is reading computer books. I can bet without a doubt that I am not the only one liking this in the history course. Obviously, university should not enable everyone take the history courses no matter what field they study in, for this policy will lead to most of students wasting time on their uninterested knowledge
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
可以的话，给我打个分吧，从下面4个方面，每个方面5分。总分4*5=20
organization,
thesis and support;
unity and coherence;
grammar and vocabulary.
Those are standards of TOEFL Writing Task, and every of which have 5 scores from WEAK to STRONG.

[ 本帖最后由 d596086 于 2008-12-14 12:03 编辑 ]

nickey0809UID: 2349468

First of all, unlike those abstrusely scientific subjects, the history is easier learned, which is totally able to finish studying in middle or high school instead of university. 这句话太强了，easier估计会有人有意见的，还是婉转一点好
flexibility is better than enforcement
the history knowledge has less value and little help to the modern society developing;这句也偏激了阿
taking （stealing）their precious time and energy
a student in school of (major in) computer science
university should not enable (enable!!!!????)everyone take the history

jackallen0714UID: 2510951

History course, a subject teaches students largely influencing matters in national or international history, is one of the most important basic curriculums in school. In most country, from middle school to high school, it is a compulsory lesson for each student; however, it turns to be an elective course in university, which means students need not take this class no matter what field they study in. I definitely support this objective fact, for it is really reasonable.

First of all, unlike those abstrusely scientific subjects, the history is easier learned 有点别扭，to learn, which is totally able to finish studying in middle or high school instead of university. I am a Chinese student, whose country has a very long history. I have touched this major for almost six years before entering into university. Not just national history, I also learned almost every great event all over the world, from ancient to contemporary era. Coming into a history classroom in the university, one can find that most of the content of lesson is the same as which in high school. That means we, the university students, have already learned enough knowledge of history, and do not need further research in this area, except of those history major’s students.
这段例证很好，学习了
,IELTS,SAT,VISA,文书,签证,论坛,出国,申请,美国,英国,欧洲,加拿大,USA
C;M
A'L'D"u
l-qX
In addition, although the history course is very important or interesting, it is not necessary to force every college students learning it. In another aspect, were anyone who is interested in the history, she or he is easily able to fulfill personal satisfaction in university. One can find numerous history books in school’s library; one can choose one or two history course which is elective; one can also take part in several history speeches listening to famous professors. Unlike high school students, college ones possess strong ability choosing useful and attractive knowledge without exterior force. That is also means that if one who not wants to study history, anybody else should not order he or she accepts this course.这儿应该是另一个论点，开始的时候最好给个说明：比如Besides

Finally, comparing with other compulsory subjects in university, the history knowledge has less value and little help to the modern society developing; and therefore, its status is reasonable lower than compulsory ones. From some sense这个搭配正确么？我个人没见过，感觉有点奇怪, make every student in university to study history is taking their precious time and energy away from major course. As for me, a student in school of computer science, I can hardly list out what kinds of history knowledge can help me finding a decent job in business company, or either helps me accomplish my academic pursuit. Even though I have chosen history course in college, most of time what I am doing in this class is reading computer books. I can bet without a doubt that I am not the only one liking this in the history course. Obviously, university should not enable-》force/demand/require/insist that everyone take the history courses no matter what field they study in, for this policy will lead to most of students wasting time on their uninterested knowledge

整体结构很好。注意复习下the定冠词的用法，我也经常乱用……。

[ 本帖最后由 jackallen0714 于 2008-12-15 16:29 编辑 ]