- 最后登录
- 2010-9-12
- 在线时间
- 10 小时
- 寄托币
- 146
- 声望
- 0
- 注册时间
- 2008-11-18
- 阅读权限
- 15
- 帖子
- 1
- 精华
- 0
- 积分
- 63
- UID
- 2573200

- 声望
- 0
- 寄托币
- 146
- 注册时间
- 2008-11-18
- 精华
- 0
- 帖子
- 1
|
"Most societies do not take their greatest thinkers seriously, even when they claim to admire them."
很多社会并不重视思想家,即使社会宣称很景仰这些思想家。
I can agree the statement above that, "Most societies do not take their greatest thinkers seriously, even when they claim to admire them". The statement is a accurate description of most greatest thinkers' plight in reality. Before illustrating this point, I would like to specify the statement randomly: the reasons why the significance of greatest thinker in most societies are ignored are that the excellent ideas initiated by the thinkers fail to prevail among the masses or can be hardly adopted by the governor or both.
Consider, most of the creation of splendid thoughts seems extreme and complicate at first, which will be accepted by quite few people who are provident adequately and tolerant with everything new. Indeed, it is the greatest thinker but the ordinary that concentrate on fierce conflict and tough social controversy. Both the depth of research and complexity of logical deduction are beyond our knowledge.
To further more, people's excessive fear of change prevents the spread of these great thoughts. Great thinkers, the soldiers’ who fight at frontier of people's metal world, are not only exploring the deep causes of highlighted controversy but also possible solution of the latest the most difficult problems. nevertheless, it will take a fairly long time to convince the ordinary people as well as the rules to maintain these originalities as a result of the majorities' conservative psychology and sloth of adjusting to totally new knowledge ,experience and systematic institution.
Every citizen might be willing to make progress for its beneficiary, however, they rarely would like to try to obtain something better in the risk of their possession accumulated for years, so a large number of them will compare the possible profits with the possible losses, and the idea that It is obviously better to avoid losses than getting profit is widely accepted although it might be far from scientific and reasonable in some occasion. Also, people's indolence is another key factor. Better life will not wait for you in the nearby, you have to runas fast as you can to strive for her while most people consider the process as pain, therefore, their motivation of bring in new idea and reform will be undermined.
Besides, poor promotion of thinkers’ theory undermine the effect of their prominent ideas. The absence of sufficient time and indispensible skills make it tough to publicize their precious thoughts for the thinkers, who are not to blame. Some traditional thinkers get into the habit of staying alone and thinking quietly day and night as ascetic so that they could easily concentrate themselves on the issue they look into and exclude any possible interruption. However, in the realistic respective, the publicizing of great thoughts superior the process of thinking, without publicizing, great ideas are no more than some sentences on the paper.
In addition, In some conditions, the governors do not highlight great thinker because some recommendation of reform might blemish their privilege and political or commercial interest. Therefore, the rulers pretend to admiring the greatest thinker, and dwarf their thought in fact, for they are the top enemy for the domination.
In summary, people's providence and tolerance to accept new ideas as well as courage to cope with change, thinker's reform of anticipation
|
|