issue144 【加州阳光】第六次作业 限时＋修改

jujuangelaUID: 2181388

144. "It is the artist, not the critic,* who gives society something of lasting value." [60]
*a person who evaluates works of art, such as novels, films, music, paintings, etc.
144. 是艺术家而不是批评家，社会一些具有持久价值的东西。
*评价艺术作品，如小说、电影、音乐、绘带给画等的人。
WORDS: 457          TIME: 0:45:00          DATE: 2006-7-8

With the meteoric development of our society and the unprecedented advanced art popularity, critic plays a more and more salient role in providing lasting value art works. Sometimes, the special group even overweighs artist self and determines which one will be preserved and receiving public accolade.

It is critic, as a fair and well-learned judger, to establish the art value and supply common standard about an art work. A critic is a scientist, analyzing data and fact and giving a judge standard, simultaneously, he/she is a philosopher, telling the basis of the judge standard and providing evidence to prove the rationality of the basis. Only when a critic guarantees his/her own theory is correct and cogent will the public accept these critical words. Thus, critic position requires not only the sensitivity and erudition about art, but also an explicit art idea and appreciation principle. In ancient times, the significance of critic is not obvious because the artist's art creation and the public's observation are all based on the existing standard. However, there are more and more novel art pattern and art idea emerging in multitude that sometimes even artist self can not explain the exact value but some creation inspiration. Meanwhile, common people with majority as laymen are not capable of finding a channel to understand the art, let alone enjoying it with total involvement. Critic is crucial to open a clear window for all and bridge the gap between the artist and public. It is the critic and only the critic can judge the true value and the meaning, which directly determine the art work's survival and development.

The critic in fact is always taking part in art creation and they are changed the role into cooperator in the evaluation process. They tell artist that which direct is available and which one is extreme, which reference can be compared and how to do better. Their evaluation is so incisive and objective that artist frequently acknowledges their help and even condemnation. The two group associate as a pair of friend who possess the equivalent art competence and can really learn other's deep psychological world, and the disagreeable debates will kindle mental spark for unbelievable development. From a practical perspective, the majority of art college president are critics and many organizer of art activity, art association leaders and art related businesspersons have another occupation: critic. Those critics who are the artists self or the guiders of the artist exert an immense influence on the art content and style.

Simultaneously, the critic is potentially producing art trend and writing the history based on their powerful effect on artistic works. As the plaintiff has no power to give witness for self, artist is unlikely to persuade public to accept the art. The ordinary audience's experience is so individual and lack of authority that it is only limited to be personal property. The idea of critics oppositely arouse(加19分钟) intensive interest and controversy in a large scale, which is the art final purpose—sharing with public. It is inevitable that there will be some unjustifiable critic and ridiculous evaluation for personal prejudice, but what corrects them is just critic so that the criticism self is a logic dialectic process with art development. An artistic work is constant, lying at the silent place, once the critic add a symbol to label it, the value of the artistic work is manifested and accepted.

Without the critic’s pruning and shaping, the art garden will be fraught with weed and lost in vigor. When you appreciate Van Gogh’s sunflower, remember that without critic accolade and propaganda the work would be lost somewhere and no longer exist in the world. (540)

benniUID: 2166321

144. "It is the artist, not the critic,* who gives society something of lasting value." [60]
*a person who evaluates works of art, such as novels, films, music, paintings, etc.
144. 是艺术家而不是批评家，社会一些具有持久价值的东西。
*评价艺术作品，如小说、电影、音乐、绘带给画等的人。
WORDS: 457          TIME: 0:45:00          DATE: 2006-7-8

With the meteoric development of our society and the unprecedented advanced art popularity, (the) critic plays a more and more salient role in providing lasting value art works. Sometimes, the special group(表达不太清楚) even overweighs artist self and determines which one will be preserved and receiving public accolade.

It is critic, as a fair and well-learned judger, to establish the art value and supply common standard about an art work. A critic is a scientist, analyzing data and fact and giving a judge standard, simultaneously,(副词不能连句子) he/she is a philosopher, telling the basis of the judge standard and providing evidence to prove the rationality of the basis. Only when a critic guarantees his/her own theory is correct and cogent will the public accept these critical words. Thus, critic position requires not only the sensitivity and erudition about art, but also an explicit art idea and appreciation principle. In ancient times, the significance of critic is not obvious because the artist's art creation and the public's observation are all based on the existing standard. However, there are more and more novel art pattern（复数） and art idea emerging in multitude that sometimes even artist self(the artist themselves) can not explain the exact value but some creation inspiration. Meanwhile, common people with majority as laymen（表意不清，主要是with的问题，可以用从句） are not capable of finding a channel to understand the art,（直接说没有透彻理解艺术作品的能力似乎更好，加上找一个渠道感觉很chinglish） let alone enjoying it with total involvement. Critic is crucial to open a clear window for all and bridge(三单) the gap between the artist and public. It is the critic and only the critic can judge the true value and the meaning, which directly determine（三单） the art work's survival and development.

The critic in fact is always taking part in art creation and they are changed(为什么被东？) the role into cooperator in the evaluation process. They tell artist that which direct is available and which one is extreme, which reference can be compared and how to do better. Their evaluation is so incisive and objective that artist frequently acknowledges their help and even condemnation. The two group（复数） associate as a pair of friend（复数） who possess the equivalent art competence and can really learn other's deep psychological world, and the disagreeable debates will kindle mental spark for unbelievable development. From a practical perspective, the majority of art college president（复数） are critics and many organizer（复数） of art activity, art association leaders and art related businesspersons have another occupation: critic. Those critics who are the artists self or the guiders of the artist exert an immense influence on the art content and style.

Simultaneously, the critic is potentially producing art trend and writing the history based on their powerful effect on artistic works. As the plaintiff has no power to give witness for self, artist is unlikely to persuade public to accept the art. The ordinary audience's experience is so individual and lack of authority that it is only limited to be personal property. The idea of critics oppositely arouse(加19分钟) intensive interest and controversy in a large scale, which is（are） the art final purpose—sharing with public. It is inevitable that there will be some unjustifiable critic and ridiculous evaluation for personal prejudice, but what corrects them is just critic so that the criticism self is a logic dialectic process with art development. An artistic work is constant, lying at the silent place, once the critic add a symbol to label it, (少连词) the value of the artistic work is manifested and accepted.

Without the critic’s pruning and shaping, the art garden will be fraught with weed and lost in vigor. When you appreciate Van Gogh’s sunflower, remember that without critic accolade and propaganda the work would be lost somewhere and no longer exist in the world.

首先很佩服你的词汇量，有很多词看着认识，但是就是想不起来用，不过有些词的用法我看着比较别扭，如果你对一些词的用法也并不熟悉的话，建议避免使用，免得不通顺。

还有就是有些表达不太流畅，翻译成中文是好句子，但英文就读来不太顺，比如那个channel. 再比如结尾段的首句，art garden 的说法生动形象，不过你可以google一下，我猜是没有说sb’s pruning and shaping 这种说法的。

还有一个内容上的问题就是， 似乎没有说清楚“lasting value”， 主要是没有举例子，都是在说理，而且有些话其实是重复得，比如第二段、第四段都提到了普通观众在奖赏方面能力的欠缺，这样显得不太和逻辑，感觉有点空，结尾段才出现一个例子。我觉得可以把评论家的部分压成两段，单一段谈谈艺术家，毕竟也是题目里的一部分。

Ps: 拍得有点狠，因为时间比较紧，客套话说得少，见谅啦~ 以后如果希望互排，俺可能就看看思路和内容吧，语法啥的相信你肯定可以搞定~