Issue157 根据上财机井写的，多谢指点！！必回拍！！

chan1983UID：166440

刚根据机井写的，用了半个小时，不过感觉还好象没什么东西写，还剩几天了，晕啊，留连接必回拍！

157."There is no such thing as purely objective observation. All observation is subjective; it is always guided by the observer's expectations or desires."

Towards to the question whether all the observations are guided by the people's will, i fundamentally agree with the speaker. But we also should know that in order to reveal the truth of the nature and society, observers must comply with what they see and make no prejudice when making the experiments.

Obviously, the role who implements the experiments are our human beings, therefore it is so hard for a person putting aside his/her feelings or will when observing. As we all know, human is a social animal that always have their own purposes when doing something. Once they have a thought about something, they will try all their best to validate their thought or verify their assumptions. In this case, when people doing experiments, they are having their purposes. therefore, all the experiments done by the people are under the guidance of the observations. take the experiments done by the two Chinese-American Nobel prize winner, Yang Zhengning and Ding Zhaozhong for example. When Yang Zhengming has proposed a new theory about the physics, the next task they have to do is to find the facts to support their theory. Then ding Zhaozhong took the task and finally prove the theory's rightness using the result of experiments.

Meanwhile, the nature has its own principles and law which can not be changed by the people's actions. The mechanism of burning, the rotation of earth, all these are objective facts. Under the effect of these laws, no matter how hard people try to seek facts to warrant their theories, the experiments always show how the objects work in the world. In this sense, the experiments are also objective.

Although the experiments is under the control of people, we should comply with what we see or what we hear faithfully. That means we must respect the truth. Many things may happen when we are doing the experiments. Maybe the result is just what we want, or maybe they are opposite to our previous assumption. In the former case, we of course have reached our goal and use the experiments to illustrate our theory. But when the latter one happens, we must accept the truth and can not fabricate any false data to support our assertions.


In sum, just based on the evidence mentioned above, it is safely to draw the conclusion that experiments are indeed under the control of the observers. But in order to reveal the truth of the nature and society, all the observers should obey the objective law.

[ Last edited by staralways on 2005-7-28 at 15:04 ]

11yvetteUID：2102418

157."There is no such thing as purely objective observation. All observation is subjective; it is always guided by the observer's expectations or desires."

Towards to the question whether all the observations are guided by the people's will, i [I 这个千万要注意啊~] fundamentally agree with the speaker. But we also should know that in order to reveal the truth of the nature and society, observers must comply with what they see and make no prejudice when making the experiments.开头简洁明了

Obviously, the role who implements the experiments are our human beings [这一句的单复数有点问题,稍许改一下吧~], therefore it is so hard for a person putting aside his/her feelings or will when observing. As we all know, human is [还是单复数的问题,后面就变成they了] a social animal that always have their own purposes when doing something. Once they have a thought about something, they will try all their best to validate their thought or verify their assumptions. In this case, when people doing experiments, they are having their purposes. therefore, all the experiments done by the people are under the guidance of the observations. take the experiments done by the two Chinese-American Nobel prize winners, Yang Zhengning and Ding Zhaozhong for example. When Yang Zhengming has proposed a new theory about the physics, the next task they have to do is to find the facts to support their theory [这一句的时态是不是有点问题]. Then ding Zhaozhong took the task and finally proved the theory's rightness using the result of experiments. 这段就举了例子,但是没有很好的加以说明，这个例证就不太能说明问题了

Meanwhile, the nature has its own principles and law which can not be changed by the [删去] people's actions. The mechanism of burning, the rotation of earth, all these are objective facts. Under the effect of these laws, no matter how hard people try to seek facts to warrant their theories, the experiments always show how the objects work in the world. In this sense, the experiments are also objective.嗯，这段的观点很好

Although the experiments is under the control of people, we should comply with what we see or what we hear faithfully. That means we must respect the truth. Many things may happen when we are doing the experiments. Maybe the result is [results are] just what we want, or maybe they are opposite to our previous assumption. In the former case, we of course have reached our goal and use the experiments to illustrate our theory. But when the latter one happens, we must accept the truth and can not fabricate any false data to support our assertions.


In sum, just based on the evidence mentioned above, it is safely to draw the conclusion that experiments are indeed under the control of the observers. But in order to reveal the truth of the nature and society, all the observers should obey the objective law.


chan的整体思路是很好，条理也很清晰，不过B2和B3写得比较少，可以想一些例子加以充实，这样的话就很ok啦~~~