寄托天下
查看: 925|回复: 3
打印 上一主题 下一主题

[a习作temp] argument25 fantasy 小组30号作业 [复制链接]

Rank: 4

声望
0
寄托币
1113
注册时间
2004-10-29
精华
0
帖子
15
跳转到指定楼层
楼主
发表于 2005-8-30 18:20:07 |只看该作者 |倒序浏览
In this argument, the arguer states that to build a golf course and resort hotel is the best way to improve Hopewell's economy. At first glance, it seems plausible, but with scrutiny, this argument suffers from several fallacies which undermine the reasoning.

In the first place, the arguer fails to state the definite reason of the increasing of tourism ,tax revenues and business in Ocean View. Instead, he or she imputes these to the building of the new municipal golf course and resort hotel without any data or relative evidences. It is entire possible that other aspects, such as the improvement of local environment, or the efficient traffic, contribute to the flourish of Ocean View. In order to strengthen the reasoning, it is better for the arguer to provide the survey with the question like " why do you come to Ocean View(OV) for tourism?" and the like.

In the second place, even assuming that the golf course and resort hotel lead to the success of Ocean View, it does not certainly follow that  what happened in OV will be repeated in Hopewell. In fact, the two town may be different at all-- in terms of salary, custom, environment and so on, thus the assumption is problematic. Put it simple, perhaps people in Ocean View have a relative decent salary, so they can afford the high price of playing golf, which help the golf course runs well. However, people in Hopewell may not afford the costs of playing golf so all the golf course's revenue relies on the tourism, which is unstable. Furthermore, what happened in OV is two years ago, perhaps now people have different interests, such as staying at home watching television with parents, or playing basketball, further weakening the reasoning.

Last but not least, the arguer states that to imitate the success of OV is the best way without addressing other methods. Logically speaking, this is a flaw. At least, the arguer should address other possible methods and make a comparison among them, and then could claim that building golf course is prior to other ways. Without such comparison, it is a bit too haste to argue the way is best.

In conclusion, the argument suffers from several fallacies. To strengthen the reasoning, the arguer should provide more evidences and data to support the reasoning. Without such support, the argument is unconvincing.
0 0

使用道具 举报

Rank: 4

声望
0
寄托币
1113
注册时间
2004-10-29
精华
0
帖子
15
沙发
发表于 2005-8-30 18:22:44 |只看该作者
本来第三段可以写的充实点, 但是时间不太够了,
hi,限时总感觉写不出自己的东西, 总感觉下意识的往下打,
大家提点意见吧,不胜感激

使用道具 举报

Rank: 6Rank: 6

声望
0
寄托币
2262
注册时间
2005-3-22
精华
1
帖子
2
板凳
发表于 2005-8-30 19:42:50 |只看该作者
题目呢??????
愿有情人终成眷属

使用道具 举报

Rank: 6Rank: 6

声望
0
寄托币
2262
注册时间
2005-3-22
精华
1
帖子
2
地板
发表于 2005-8-30 21:29:10 |只看该作者
In this argument, the arguer states that to build a golf course and resort hotel is the best way to improve Hopewell's economy. At first glance, it seems plausible, but with scrutiny, this argument suffers from several fallacies which undermine the reasoning.

In the first place, the arguer fails to state the definite reason of the increasing of   tourism ,tax revenues and business in Ocean View. Instead, he or she imputes these to the building of the new municipal golf course and resort hotel without any data or relative evidences. It is entire possible that other aspects, such as the improvement of local environment, or the efficient traffic, contribute to the flourish of Ocean View. In order to strengthen the reasoning, it is better for the arguer to provide the survey with the question like " why do you come to Ocean View(OV) for tourism?" and the like.结尾有对作者思路的补充。。这里就没有必要了

In the second place, even assuming that the golf course and resort hotel lead to the success of Ocean View, it does not certainly follow that  what happened in OV will be repeated没有必要用被动 in Hopewell. In fact, the two town may be different at all-- in terms of salary这个和其他2个不是平行的, custom, environment and so on, thus the assumption作者没有什么假设吧 is problematic. Put it simple, perhaps people in Ocean View have a relative decent salary, so they can afford the high price of playing golf, which help the golf course runs well. However, people in Hopewell may not afford the costs of playing golf so all the golf course's revenue relies on the tourism, which is unstable. Furthermore, what happened in OV is two years ago, perhaps now people have different interests, such as staying at home watching television with parents, or playing basketball, further weakening the reasoning.这段不错。。。

Last but not least, the arguer states that to imitate the success of OV is the best way without addressing other methods. Logically speaking, this is a flaw. 这句不是太好。。。At least, the arguer should address other possible methods and make a comparison among them, and then could claim that building golf course is prior to other ways. Without such comparison, it is a bit too haste to argue the way is best.这段太单薄了。。感觉整体比例失调。。。以后要注意时间的分配啊。。。

In conclusion, the argument suffers from several fallacies. 开头有句相同的了。。换个说法。。。To strengthen the reasoning, the arguer should provide more evidences and data to support the reasoning. Without such support, the argument is unconvincing.


问题都说出来了。。。还不错。。。习惯一下限时。。。
有时间看看我的117
https://bbs.gter.net/viewthread.php?tid=328791
愿有情人终成眷属

使用道具 举报

RE: argument25 fantasy 小组30号作业 [修改]

问答
Offer
投票
面经
最新
精华
转发
转发该帖子
argument25 fantasy 小组30号作业
https://bbs.gter.net/thread-328966-1-1.html
复制链接
发送
回顶部