issue157 v6战队，8.4，同主题12

11yvetteUID: 2102418

------题目------
There is no such thing as purely objective observation. All observation is subjective; it is always guided by the observer's expectations or desires.

------提纲------
B1 认同没有纯粹的客观观察
B2 从政治法律角度，认为观察是主观的
B3 从艺术人文角度，观察亦是主观
B4 但对于自然科学而言，客观的观察方能更好地揭示自然的本质

------正文------
The assertion stated above is a problem for many people to argue. Someone approve that all observation is subjective while some other ones can not agree any more. For me, I partly support what the assertion said, for different domains having different observation according to the aims.

To begin with, the same as the vague definition of right or wrong, objective and subjective are a pair of relative concept for there is no such absolute limit. The purely objective observation hardly exists in this high tempo world as well as the past. Since people become more and more practical and always want to attain to the goal in the shortest time with the least energy, in this case, much observation is conducted as what they think before the observation began. However, we avoid discuss such kind of observation, instead of which we would like to aim at the traditional scientific observation in different fields which needs the observers' devotion with heart and soul but less consideration of fame and profit.

For politics and law, the observation is subjective. For the purpose of politics and law study is getting to the goal which has already considered by the scholar, and the observation is the process of finding the evidence to support the anticipant conclusion. For example, the attorney should provide the proof to help his or her client to win the lawsuit. So for the attorney, he or she has already known what his or her responsibility is and he or she may seek for the evidence basing on such inclination. Politics, almost the same, treats observation as a servant to the final result. Thus, in the fields as politics and law, purely objective observation may cause observers confused and aimless, and the study may not continue properly.

For arts and humanity, the observation calls for subjective. As the artists are those emotional people, do whatever their minds drive and show the subtle sensibility. For them, the creation may be ceased if the objectivity is demanded. Beethoven wrote the choral finale for the last movement of the 9th symphony with his heart instead of his deaf ears, if he was an objective musician, how can he comprehend Schiller’s hymn and set “Ode to Joy” into his music after he completely lost of his audition, totally absurd. Only his subjective adamant insists lit his way of writing bravura. Same as musician, painters and writers observe the world with their own eyes, their own minds and their own wills. Without the subjective observation, all the works would be uniform, losing their special colors, no more passion burst which shocks the masses.

However, for natural science, no matter what the observers' minds go, the observation should be recorded in an objective way. Different with the fields we discussed above, natural science just like a camera recording what happens through the lens, and then transforms the image by Analog/Digital Transformer, Data Signal Processor and Digital/Analog Transformer, and eventually shows the image of what had been taken to human beings. This process is out of human control, as no one can add his or her inclination to the observation. So the study of natural science needs objective observation which would attribute to the discoveries of the unknown nature.

To sum up, whether the observation is subjective or objective relies on the fields that people study. As the politics, arts and humanity, without objective viewpoint, the scholars would lose their identity in testification and creation. On the contrary, the natural scientists should keep an objective eyeshot on their study to uncover the veil of the nature. Together with the objective and subjective observation in different domains, the world we live tends to getting more and more advanced with harmony.

一直觉得这个题目比较难下手，拖了好久了……

[ Last edited by 11yvette on 2005-8-4 at 21:46 ]

11yvetteUID: 2102418

自己先顶

GladysryUID: 198609

我来~

11yvetteUID: 2102418

太谢谢gladysry提的这些建议了,我写得时候就觉得B1挺难写,而且语句间基本没什么连贯性,要改,关于B4的例子,提得真好,sigh~~没有意识到含蓄美啊~~~
:handshake

flfengUID: 2111823

issue157 v6战队，8.4，同主题12

------题目------
There is no such thing as purely objective observation. All observation is subjective; it is always guided by the observer's expectations or desires.

------提纲------
B1 认同没有纯粹的客观观察
B2 从政治法律角度，认为观察是主观的
B3 从艺术人文角度，观察亦是主观
B4 但对于自然科学而言，客观的观察方能更好地揭示自然的本质

------正文------
The assertion stated above is a problem for many people to argue. Someone approve that all observation is subjective while some other ones can not agree any more. For me, I partly support what the assertion said, for different domains having different observation according to the aims.

To begin with, the same as the vague definition of right or wrong, objective and subjective are a pair of relative concept for there is no such absolute limit. The purely objective observation hardly exists in this high tempo world as well as the past. Since people become more and more practical and always want to attain to the goal in the shortest time with the least energy, in this case, much observation is conducted as what they think before the observation began. However, we avoid discuss such kind of observation, instead of which we would like to aim at the traditional scientific observation in different fields which needs the observers' devotion with heart and soul but less consideration of fame and profit.

For politics and law, the observation is subjective. For the purpose of politics and law study is getting to the goal which has already considered by the scholar, and the observation is the process of finding the evidence to support the anticipant conclusion. For example, the attorney should provide the proof to help his or her client to win the lawsuit. So for the attorney, he or she has already known what his or her responsibility is and he or she may seek for the evidence basing on such inclination. Politics, almost the same, treats observation as a servant to the final result. Thus, in the fields as politics and law, purely objective observation may cause observers confused and aimless, and the study may not continue properly.

For arts and humanity, the observation calls for subjective. As the artists are those emotional people, do whatever their minds drive and show the subtle sensibility. For them, the creation may be ceased if the objectivity is demanded. Beethoven wrote the choral finale for the last movement of the 9th symphony with his heart instead of his deaf ears, if he was an objective musician, how can he comprehend Schiller’s hymn and set “Ode to Joy” into his music after he completely lost of his audition, totally absurd. Only his subjective adamant insists lit his way of writing bravura. Same as musician, painters and writers observe the world with their own eyes, their own minds and their own wills. Without the subjective observation, all the works would be uniform, losing their special colors, no more passion burst which shocks the masses.

However, for natural science, no matter what the observers' minds go, the observation should be recorded in an objective way. Different with the fields we discussed above, natural science just like a camera recording what happens through the lens, and then transforms the image by Analog/Digital Transformer, Data Signal Processor and Digital/Analog Transformer, and eventually shows the image of what had been taken to human beings. This process is out of human control, as no one can add his or her inclination to the observation. So the study of natural science needs objective observation which would attribute to the discoveries of the unknown nature.

To sum up, whether the observation is subjective or objective relies on the fields that people study. As the politics, arts and humanity, without objective viewpoint, the scholars would lose their identity in testification and creation. On the contrary, the natural scientists should keep an objective eyeshot on their study to uncover the veil of the nature. Together with the objective and subjective observation in different domains, the world we live tends to getting more and more advanced with harmony.

一直觉得这个题目比较难下手，拖了好久了……

文章写的不错，的确比较难写的一篇。兄弟们已经给你改过好多了， 基本到位， 我不用做多少努力了吧！

还是提议你去看一下老外280篇， 这篇文章那里写的非常好， 讲了observation and interpretation 之间的关系， 我想你看一下就知道为什么难写了， 其实概念和想法有点小问题。

但是你这样的提纲很好的， 写下去也能自圆其说， 没问题的！

11yvetteUID: 2102418

谢谢flfeng提醒啊～～
这就去学一下280的思路
关于B1，我下午刚改了一下，居然把280给疏忽了，寒-_-#