0910G[JUST DO IT] Issue144 by二月蓝

二月蓝UID: 2643877

0910G[JUST DO IT] Issue144
    The artist is the creator of works of art, meanwhile, the critic displays the art to the public and promote the evolution of field of art. Consequently, both the artist and the critic gives lasting value to the public, however, the critic may hold a more vital position in a way to the society.
    Art is a kind of ideology in the society, which comes from the living of the populace. Admittedly, the artist is the originator of the works of art, such as paintings, novels, music and so forth. They search inspiration from those daily materials, give birth to their productions and make them not only a piece of paper or mussy letters but also could reflect the images of the society. Besides reflection on relationships between public, art displays viewpoints and ideas of public as well, even emotion and dreams. We can not believe what the world would be without art. So then who display the real value of art to the public?
    Not only the magazines or exhibitions but also the critics could be the carries of the art. On the first hand, the critics could display the pith and core of the work to the public. Without the analysis and estimate of the works, people may not fully understand the value of the art which is indigestible. Picasso’s prolific inventiveness and technical versatility made him the dominant figure in avant-garde art. His works may be pieces of waste paper in the absence of the critics who really show the pith to people. On the second hand, the critic could accelerate the revolution of the art. People may not find mistakes made by themselves and it is the same as the artists. Nobody is perfect when he is a baby. It is just the critics who really understand them and point out mistakes besides sparks out of the art. With the suggestions, the artists could renew themselves and consequently gain more in the future. Moreover, the critics could scout talent in the field of art from their works. Majority of the public can not understand the art entirely and even misunderstand the artist. Only the critics are aware of the merits of the works and realize whether the artist has great promise or not. The Oscar, first celebrated in 1929, is hold every year in the USA, which aims to speed up advancement of picture art. It is a form of critic and not only for award but also for encouraging new hand.
    Although the artists are the real creator, they prefer to express their emotion or experiences purely instead of aiming to bring something to the society. It is the critics, who renew the artists and promote the revolution of art. It is the critics, who really exhibit the merits to the public and then present the lasting value of art to the society.

greenxsUID: 2529289

The artist is the creator of works of art, meanwhile, the critic displays the art to the public and promote the evolution of field of art. Consequently, both the artist and the critic gives这不应该是单数吧 lasting value to the public, however, the critic may hold a more vital position in a way to the society.
    Art is a kind of ideology in the society, which comes from the living of the populace. Admittedly, the artist is the originator of the works of art（art works）, such as paintings, novels, music and so forth. They search inspiration from those daily materials, give birth to their productions and make them not only a piece of paper or mussy这是？ letters but also could reflect the images of the society. Besides reflection on relationships between public, art displays viewpoints and ideas of public as well, even emotion and dreams. We can not believe what the world would be without art. So then who display the real value of art to the public?
    Not only the magazines or exhibitions but also the critics could be the carries of the art. On the first hand, the critics could display the pith and core of the work to the public. Without the analysis and estimate of the works, people may not fully understand the value of the art which is indigestible. Picasso’s prolific inventiveness and technical versatility made him the dominant figure in avant-garde art. His works may be pieces of waste paper in the absence of the critics who really show the pith to people. On the second （other）hand, the critic could accelerate the revolution of the art. People may not find mistakes made by themselves and it is the same as the artists. Nobody is perfect when he is a baby. It is just the critics who really understand them and point out mistakes besides sparks out of the art. With the suggestions, the artists could renew themselves and consequently gain more in the future. Moreover, the critics could scout talent in the field of art from their works. Majority of the public can not understand the art entirely and even misunderstand the artist. Only the critics are aware of the merits of the works and realize whether the artist has great promise or not. The Oscar, first celebrated in 1929, is holding every year in the USA, which aims to speed up advancement of picture art. It is a form of critic and not only for award but also for encouraging new hand.
    Although the artists are the real creator, they prefer to express their emotion or experiences purely instead of aiming to bring something to the society. It is the critics, who renew the artists and promote the revolution of art. It is the critics, who really exhibit the merits to the public and then present the lasting value of art to the society.
我觉得第三段能分成两段说一下，否则递进的关系不是很明显
写的不错，是限时写的么

1# 二月蓝

二月蓝UID: 2643877

    The artist is the creator of works of art, meanwhile, the critic displays the art to the public and promote the evolution of field of art. Consequently, both the artist and the critic give lasting value to the public, however, the critic may hold a more vital position in a way to the society.
    Art is a kind of ideology in the society, which comes from the living of the populace. Admittedly, the artist is the originator of the art works, such as paintings, novels, music and so forth. They search inspiration from those daily materials, give birth to their productions and make them not only a piece of paper or letters but also could reflect the images of the society. Besides reflection on relationships between public, art displays viewpoints and ideas of public as well, even emotion and dreams. We cannot believe what the world would be without art. So then who display the real value of art to the public?
    Not only the magazines or exhibitions but also the critics could be the carries of the art. On the first hand, the critics could display the pith and core of the work to the public. Without the analysis and estimate of the works, people may not fully understand the value of the art which is indigestible. Picasso’s prolific inventiveness and technical versatility made him the dominant figure in avant-garde art. His works may be pieces of waste paper in the absence of the critics who really show the pith to people. On the other hand, the critic could accelerate the revolution of the art. People may not find mistakes made by themselves and it is the same as the artists. Nobody is perfect when he is a baby. It is just the critics who really understand them and point out mistakes besides sparks out of the art. With the suggestions, the artists could renew themselves and consequently gain more in the future.
    Moreover, the critics could scout talent in the field of art from their works. Majority of the public cannot understand the art entirely and even misunderstand the artist. Only the critics are aware of the merits of the works and realize whether the artist has great promise or not. The Oscar, first celebrated in 1929, is holding every year in the USA, which aims to speed up advancement of picture art. It is a form of critic and not only for award but also for encouraging new hand.
    Although the artists are the real creator, they prefer to express their emotion or experiences purely instead of aiming to bring something to the society. It is the critics, who renew the artists and promote the revolution of art. It is the critics, who really exhibit the merits to the public and then present the lasting value of art to the society.

houpei0126UID: 2643060

不好意思啊~~由于最近考试都考疯了，时间太紧了，就改的有些仓促。。。希望不要介意~~
The artist is the creator of works of art(还是改一下吧，读起来很绕); meanwhile, the critic displays the art to the public and promote(promotes) the evolution of field of art. Consequently, both the artist and the critic gives lasting value to the public, however, the critic may hold a more vital position in a way to the society.（表明观点）   
Art is a kind of ideology in the society, which comes from the living（你想表达的是life 吧？） of the populace. Admittedly, the artist is the originator of the works of art, such as paintings, novels, music and so forth. They search inspiration from those daily materials, give birth to their productions and make them not only a piece of paper or mussy letters but also could reflect the images of the society. Besides reflection on relationships between public, art displays viewpoints and ideas of public as well, even emotion and dreams. We can not（cannot） believe(换成想象之类的会更贴切些) what the world would be （like）without art. （或者有个衔接句会更好些）So then who display the real value of art to the public?
    Not only the magazines or exhibitions but also the critics could be the carries of the art. On the first hand, the critics could display the pith and core of the work to the public. Without the analysis and estimate of the works, people may not fully understand the value of the art which is indigestible. Picasso’s prolific inventiveness and technical versatility made him the dominant figure in avant-garde art. His works may be pieces of waste paper in the absence of the critics who really show the pith to people. On the second hand, the critic could accelerate the revolution of the art. People may not find mistakes made by themselves and it is the same as the artists. Nobody is perfect when he is a baby. It is just the critics who really understand them and point out mistakes besides sparks out of the art. With the suggestions, the artists could renew themselves and consequently gain more in the future. Moreover, the critics could scout talent in the field of art from their works. Majority of the public can not（cannot） understand the art entirely and even misunderstand the artist. Only the critics are aware of the merits of the works and realize whether the artist has great promise or not. The Oscar, first celebrated in 1929, is hold (held)every year in the USA, which aims to speed up advancement of picture art. It is a form of critic and not only for award but also for encouraging new hand.
    Although the artists are the real creator, they prefer to express their emotion or experiences purely instead of aiming to bring something to the society. It is the critics, who renew the artists and promote the revolution of art. It is the critics, who really exhibit the merits to the public and then present the lasting value of art to the society.

结构很清晰，但语言的表达还略显晦涩~~~继续加油啊

二月蓝UID: 2643877

    The artist is the creator of art works, meanwhile, the critic displays the art to the public and promotes the evolution of field of art. Consequently, both the artist and the critic give lasting value to the public, however, the critic may hold a more vital position in a way to the society.
    Art is a kind of ideology in the society, which comes from the living of the populace. Admittedly, the artist is the originator of the art works, such as paintings, novels, music and so forth. They search inspiration from those daily materials, give birth to their productions and make them not only a piece of paper or letters but also could reflect the images of the society. Besides reflection on relationships between public, art displays viewpoints and ideas of public as well, even emotion and dreams. We cannot imagine what the world would be like without art. So then who display the real value of art to the public?
    Not only the magazines or exhibitions but also the critics could be the carries of the art. On the first hand, the critics could display the pith and core of the work to the public. Without the analysis and estimate of the works, people may not fully understand the value of the art which is indigestible. Picasso’s prolific inventiveness and technical versatility made him the dominant figure in avant-garde art. His works may be pieces of waste paper in the absence of the critics who really show the pith to people. On the other
hand, the critic could accelerate the revolution of the art. People may not find mistakes made by themselves and it is the same as the artists. Nobody is perfect when he is a baby. It is just the critics who really understand them and point out mistakes besides sparks out of the art. With the suggestions, the artists could renew themselves and consequently gain more in the future.
    Moreover, the critics could scout talent in the field of art from their works. Majority of the public cannot understand the art entirely and even misunderstand the artist. Only the critics are aware of the merits of the works and realize whether the artist has great promise or not. The Oscar, first celebrated in 1929, is holding every year in the USA, which aims to speed up advancement of picture art. It is a form of critic and not only for award but also for encouraging new hand.
    Although the artists are the real creator, they prefer to express their emotion or experiences purely instead of aiming to bring something to the society. It is the critics, who renew the artists and promote the revolution of art. It is the critics, who really exhibit the merits to the public and then present the lasting value of art to the society.

zmjxf2008UID: 2597395

The artist is the creator of art works, meanwhile, the critic displays the art to the public and promotes the evolution of field of art. Consequently, both the artist and the critic give lasting value to the public, however, the critic may hold a more vital position in a way to the society（?).
    Art is a kind of ideology in the society, which comes from the living of the populace. Admittedly, the artist is the originator of the art works, such as paintings, novels, music and so forth. They search inspiration from those daily materials, give birth to their productions and make them not only a piece of paper or letters but also could reflect the images of the society. Besides reflection on relationships between public(?), art displays viewpoints and ideas of public as well, even emotion and dreams. We cannot imagine what the world would be like without art. So then who display the real value of art to the public?
    Not only the magazines or exhibitions but also the critics could be the carries of the art（？）. On the first（one，没有on the first hand 一说） hand, the critics could display the pith and core of the work to the public. Without the analysis and estimate of the works, people may not fully understand the value of the art which is indigestible. Picasso’s prolific inventiveness and technical versatility made him the dominant figure in avant-garde art. His works may be pieces of waste paper in the absence of the critics who really show the pith to people. On the other hand, the critic could accelerate the revolution of the art. People may not find mistakes made by themselves and it is the same as the artists. Nobody is perfect when he is a baby. It is just the critics who really understand them and point out mistakes besides sparks out of the art. With the suggestions, the artists could renew themselves and consequently gain more in the future.
    Moreover, the critics could scout talent in the field of art from their works. Majority (一般用a /the majority）of the public cannot understand the art entirely and even misunderstand the artist. Only the critics are aware of the merits of the works and realize whether the artist has great promise or not. The Oscar, first celebrated in 1929, is holding every year in the USA, which aims to speed up advancement of picture art. It is a form of critic and not only for award but also for encouraging new hand.（个人认为没有必要另列一段，可以并在上一段第一个方面里面，即评论家可以展示作品好的方面，例子也可以用在那里）
    Although the artists are the real creator, they prefer to express their emotion or experiences purely instead of aiming to bring something to the society. It is the critics, who renew the artists（用art 好些吧） and promote the revolution of art. It is the critics, who really exhibit the merits to the public and then present the lasting value of art to the society.

总体感觉还不错，大问号的地方我觉得有些词不达意，在斟酌斟酌。这周忙考试去了，好几天没顾得上网，改的很晚，不好意思，有时间看看吧。