- 最后登录
- 2015-3-25
- 在线时间
- 1349 小时
- 寄托币
- 16929
- 声望
- 925
- 注册时间
- 2009-5-31
- 阅读权限
- 50
- 帖子
- 700
- 精华
- 1
- 积分
- 7532
- UID
- 2646910
 
- 声望
- 925
- 寄托币
- 16929
- 注册时间
- 2009-5-31
- 精华
- 1
- 帖子
- 700
|
发表于 2009-6-21 22:51:23
|显示全部楼层
144. "It is the artist, not the critic, who gives society something of lasting value."
Most often, the term of "artist" describes those who create within activities such as drawing, painting, sculpture, acting, dancing, writing, filmmaking, photography, and music—people who use imagination, talent, or skill to create works that may be judged to have an aesthetic value. Art historians and critics will define as artists, those who produce art within a recognized or recognizable discipline. Definitely, we can clearly find out that those artists give the society something of lasting value because their works could be passed and evaluated from generation to generation and bring them something valuable; however, majority of the contemporary world and descendants always judge those great works on the shoulders of the critics.
First and foremost, the artist creates his artistic work through his efforts, wisdom, conception, views, social experience, etc. then at last achieves the precious fruit of his labor, thus, beyond all doubt, it includes something of lasting value, and nevertheless, people normally treat the critics’ words as reference. The critics guides common people to expose the value of artistic works in a more profound way, they reveal authors’ exact views and wills to help social individuals understand the meaning of those works of art. Generally speaking, the critics’ comments are quite trenchant in the eyes of the public and their remarks usually can easily influence the opinions of the others people. The critics play in a role of leading public to read those works in a more deep and sobering way, that’s the specific value what they contribute to the world. Without Van Wyck Brooks, an American literary critic, biographer, and historian who was the discommender of Mark Twain, and Bernard Augustine DeVoto, an American historian and author who specialized in the history of the American West which was the advocate of Mark Twain, people would never observe Mark Twain’s literary works included such many hidden views, that complicated values caused by American culture, and the overall image of the United States. That was the value those critics brought and created; it’s the fact that they are also eternal values.
Additionally, the critics undoubtedly aroused public thinking and engaged people pay more attention on the artistic works. The critics always advise their viewpoints immediately after the artists promulgated their latest works, and then a heated discussion will be set off among the people. Alternatively, the critics lay comments on those famous works in the history will draw more attention of people, cause them thinking over those reputable works with fire-new eyes and values. Either agree or disagree with the critics, people appreciate the artistic work with more serious attitude, to say the least, majority of social audiences would consider over that if the work deserves the comments or not, no matter the words are positive or negative. Artists to create great works of art for people to enjoy and to give people inspiration, critics to create a better atmosphere of discussing arts, to help people better interpret the intention of the author, and lead to a deeper level of artistic thinking. Both of them are creating lasting values for the human society.
Furthermore, the critics might even affect the evaluation of the artist's artistic style not only on the extent of public criteria but also the artists themselves’ aesthetic standards. The critics usually are required to stand in a more objective position to evaluate all those artistic works. Generally, they need to compare different artists’ works, different periods’ works, and different styles’ works before they conclude the conclusion. They need to show the evidence which can support their comments is relevant and cogent. Thus, the artists always treat the critics’ words quite circumspectly; of course they will not easily be affected due to these remarks, but they will reflect their works with the critics mentioned words, and the results of such careful consideration will be clearly reflected in their future works, especially those young artists who still don’t have mature artistic style. If the artists are devoting themselves to those things have lasting values, the critics are also affecting the final results.
In short, the artists bring wonderful artistic works, enrich people’s spiritual life, provide aesthetic enjoyment and tell philosophy of life, they definitely give something of lasting value to the society. Nevertheless, the critics guide the social audiences to treat these works in a more profound way, cause them focusing on the arts and also give feedbacks to the artists, we should admit their irreplaceable role in our social life and those lasting values they create. |
|