独立加综合 写作

luckyryxUID: 3149047

占座先

luckyryxUID: 3149047

Does people are easier to become educated than in the past, as the speaker assert? In my opinion, as the change of the world, as the exploration of the knowledge, as the advancement of the technology, people can access to knowledge from varies ways. Such as the prevail of internet. People can be easier to be informed than ever before.
    Book is a luxury in the ancient China before nineteenth century, only few people whose family can afford the money can own the chance to become educated. In addition, without the technology of printing, few people can own books. Industry revolution changes the world. Not only improve the level of people's material life, but also the spirit. Newspapers, magazines, assorted books, and radios, which extent people's view of knowledge, and bring an expand world to everyone. People are becoming easier to contact knowledge.  
   As the explosions of information, and the invention of internet, and the prevail of computers and TV, it change the old conception of traditional education, that teacher tutor students in a classroom. People can get degree from the online course established by the college and university. In addition, many company set online course to meet the people who want to accept advance education and improve their competence but they do not have enough time to spend on college. And there are kinds of school enroll students not need they to take test , that's the best way for those people who can't not enter college but still want to become educated to prepare for jobs. For example, cooking school, they teach students how to cook, without limitation and examination.
   Finally, before the activity of feminisms, few girls has the right to become educate, and few school enroll women, thus, many talent girls lost the right to receive advanced education. But, the ideology of people change dramatically before the previous century. Now more and more female can receive education than ever before.
   To sum up, as the development of the civilization, culture, technology, sciences, not only the way that people can receive to that make it is easier to become educated, but the right to receive education.

luckyryxUID: 3149047

综合 TPO1
The reading passage contends that employees should work a four-day week and willing to accept less pay in order to do so, the reason is that a four-day workweek for four-fifth of their normal pay. The shorter workweek would increase company profits because employees would feel more rested and alert, and can improve work efficacy for the company. And reducing work time can offer this option to employees so reduce the unemployment rates. Finally the option of a four day workweek would better for individual employees.
   The listening that completely refutes the reading passage, it points that offering the option of a four day workweek won't affect the company profits condition or the lives of employees in the reading suggests.
  First, the point, stated in the reading passage, is that four day workweek improve the efficacy of the employees for rhea same money. In contrast, the listening passage holds the opposite opinion and believes that four-day’ workweek will increase the expenditure of the company to hire new employees. Such as the money to provide training, medical benefits and need money to build more work place.
  Second, the reading passage contends that it will benefit the individual employee, but the speaker in the listening says that while give the employee more time to invest their life, but also present some risk to end up their quality of life. The employee are more likely to lose their jobs because of they lost the stability of their jobs and chance to be promote.

海风吹过UID: 3199801

3# luckyryx 综合作文我们一组的，改好了，加油！

luckyryxUID: 3149047

11-22  
writed by luckyryx
Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? We should never be impolite to another person
Human being are social animals, none can live independently, thus it's important to establish well
relationships with other human beings around us. During the process of social activities, there inevitable some aggressive behavior exist. For the nature of biological, aggression is an instinctive attribution of human characteristic, such as Sigmud Frued said aggressive impulses are inevitable reaction to the frustrations of daily life.so we cannot always polite to other people. But I am not mean to emphasis aggressive behavior is the way we get along with other people. Admittedly, human being learn polite behavior during cooperation, our cognitive influence our behavior that influenced by our values, by the ways in which we interpret our situations.


First of all, competition is a way of life in today's world. The capitalist society encourages competition, Individual for the sake of survival in competition, must undermine some other's interest. Considering the actual fierce strife in job market, someone who either want to gain his purpose to get more profits, or want to receive the chance to be promotion, they may do varies tactics, such as cheating, denigrating other’s reputation, violate other’s privacy,
or even duress other's life. In such condition, confrontation is the best way to solve the problem other than smiling. Furthermore competition stimulate people engender some emotions, such as angry and envy, the losers may hardly be kindly to the successful one, they may decried the reputation of other people through fabricating scandals. In such condition, human being remain hardly be polite to others. The one who's reputation is defamed or private property is offended should give aggressively despondence.


Secondly, viewing the history of human socialization, wars, bloods and violence events is the main themes of human history.
Just adequate behavior and polite social etiquette cannot resolve the problems that involving land and wealth among different countries. For example, during the second world war two, Japan invaded our motherland, and destroyed our home, killed our sisters and brothers, enthralled people to work for them, humiliated the glory of our nation culture. At that time, we cannot be polite to our enemy. Only can the Chinese people use guns and weapons protect the security of its people and maintain the survival. It's the same that we can't not be polite to someone who threaten our security.



Nevertheless, I concede that our behavior is influenced by our values, by the way in which we interpret our situations, and by choice. Although in my opinion, aggression is necessary and universal in our human life. But that's not always the things. Life is not pure competition. and peace also is the main themes of history. We would not get very far either, with everyone fighting everyone else over every little issue. We should learn how to cooperate with others. During cooperation, we learn ways to communicate with each other. Obviously, polite behavior can improve the efficacy of human activities and help people live a harmony life. Such as thousands people play an orchestra. We should be polite to others to avoid conflict that not justifiable. Smiling , praising, and esteem can solve many dispute that would be avoided.


In a word, human cognitive factors intervene human behaviors. People decide whether they will aggression or politeness dependent on the situation. No one can always polite to others during our social activties.

Fenjuan.HuUID: 3104413

改好啦，下午有点事情，改迟了，见谅啊

liang0603UID: 3182007

楼主词汇distend了....共勉加油！

luckyryxUID: 3149047

11-24  Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Parents should allow their children to make mistakes and let themlearn from their own mistakes.
I strongly[agree with the contention that parents should allow their children to make mistakes and let themself learn from their own mistakes. Primary because[this contention accords with common sense that no mistake can be avoidable. Besides, only can children learn the deep meanly under the mistake they can avoid to do the same mistake again, which are critical to the development of any child.


Admittedly, many people, however, are not comfortable with errors. They may regard the mistakes as bad apples. Just like our educational system, based on "the right answer" belief, cultivates our thinking in another, more conservative way. From an early age, we are taught that right answers are good and incorrect answers are bad. This value is deeply embedded in the incentive system used in most schools and the parents. Both of them make measurements and
regulations which show what to do and what not to prevent their children making mistakes. They publish the children who don’t obey the regulations

Nevertheless, even God can make mistakes, and no one is perfect. During the early years of development, children hardly can avoid to make mistakes, can hardly considerate the consequence of their behaviors. Although, most people may consider right and mistakes as opposites, they are both products of the same process. An activity which produces a hit may also produce a mistake. So, the most important things is not to blame the children when they make mistakes or proscribe them not to make mistakes, but to induct their behavior and conduct them to learn from the mistakes. As a matter of fact, the whole history of discovery is filled with people who use errands assumptions and fault ideas as stepping stones to new ideas. Such as Columbus thought he found a short road to India, and Johannes Kepler stumbled on the idea of explanatory gravity because assumption which were right for the wrong reasons, and Thomas Edison knew 1800 ways not to build a light bulb.


Moreover, Error serve another useful purpose: they tell us when to change direction. When things growing smoothly, we don't know think about them. We learn by trial and error. Not by rightness. Only when the children make errors do the know what 's the right thing. Negative feedback means the children’s current behavior is not right and is up to the parents duty to induct their children how to erect their behavior. If the children do things correctly every time, parents should never know the shortage of their children and would never change the way to educate their children. For example, Washington, the first precedent of American, chopped down one of his father’s favorite cherry tree when his was a little boy, which made his father angry, but his father praised his honesty when he conferred his mistake. From that lesson, Washington learned what was wrong ,and learn that honesty is an right thing, which is the most shine character of him.



To sum up, on one hand, many parents are not like with mistakes, they do not allow their children to make mistakes. On the other hand, children are too young to understand the criteria of wrong and right, they can not do things with critical thinking. Only when the children make mistakes do the children know to change direction and do their parents know how to conduct them .Thus, it’s parents responsibility to induct their children to understand what should do what should not, rather than forbid them to make mistakes.

[

luckyryxUID: 3149047

Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? The main role of the university professor is to educate students rather than to do research   

Should the main role of the university professor is to educated students rather than to do research? In a sense i do agree with that argument, it's the job of professor to impart knowledge to the students to prepare them for their future work or study. But, It beg a question that, we cannot emphasis the role of education more important than to do research.  In my view,  i agree that the main role of the university is to do research.

Admittedly, it’s the responsibility of the professor to introduce students. Students enroll to university, where has vast resource of knowledge, students urge to be informed as a sponge that want to absorb the new technology and scientific information. Professor is the most important people that can directly impart such knowledge to students, their lucid explanations of science make the knowledge easier to be understood. For instance, I am a medicine student; i can hardly learn the courses, such as pathology, physiology, cellular and molecular biology, without the help of the professors.

Nevertheless, professors who master the newest knowledge, have to keep the same step with the scientific world. But, many theories just base on hypothesis, so that; they could not accept those theories without verification. The best way to analysis the new theory is to replicate them and observe the results. Thus it's necessary for the professors to do several researches before they inform that knowledge to students. Furthermore, professors receive huge information from the reports that issued recent years. The new theories or results may inspire them with new ideas. The new idea should be verified by experiment. For example, my teacher is a professor in Zhejiang University; she was inspired by an idea from one hypothesis that published on one famous journal. The new idea stimulated her to do some research on it. The result of her experiment provided a crucial evidence to support the hypothesis. In the same breadth, my teacher won a reward from the research.

In addition, students also can learn information from the professors’ research. In my university, many professor employ students to participate in their researches. To participate in their research, the students have to go over the library and read amount of papers. During the progress of searching information, not only it significantly broadens the scope of the knowledge, students also benefit from it to learn how to combine theory and practice. Furthermore students can learn how to learn knowledge by themself. We cannot fail to take into count the fact that education does not end with graduation. As Socrates said "It's not to inserting the stuff things of information into a person but rather eliciting knowledge from his own, it's the drawing out of what is in his mind”

To sum up, i agree that professor should educated students in university. Nevertheless, it's necessary for professors to do research, while they can employ students, translate the old tradition way that knowledge-centered to student-centered. Progressive educators seek not to teach knowledge but to impart the skills for students to acquire knowledge on their own.

pwang09UID: 3159708

修改好了，个人意见，仅供参考，如有不适，还请谅解

luckyryxUID: 3149047

The most principle reason i agree with statement that parents should help children to do their work or encourage children to do their work independently is that parents is the most closest people to contact with their children.

In the first place, parents are the closest people that link with children. Without parents helping, children can not survive alone. During the early stage of development, our parents help us how to eat ,walk, speak. Not only as a gardener to cultivate his flowers but also a teacher who teaches
us knowledge, morality and bravery. What's more, in the early stage of development, children cannot handle the problem or works dependently; they need the advice and help from parents,
for parent having life experiences and skills. In the same breath, most Parents would like to devote time and energy to help children to deal with their work, which can help them to develop intimacy relationship and share the same sense of fulfillment. For example, when i studied in the elementary school, my teacher assigned us to establish a model of ship. I planned to create a 2 floors that was made of wood, but i had no knowledge of carpenter. I felt so disappointed with it. Fortunately my father said he was pleasure to help me. We had spent a weaken to accomplish the ship model together. Although i have already lost the ship, but i still remember that i spend a very happy time when worked with my father. My father often recovery the story of wood ship and share the story with me when family gathering , and i feel my father's love in it.

In the second place, I concede that parents help children to do their work which may make children lost the ability to handle problems dependently. Nevertheless, i don’t agree parents to help children to do work without considering the quality of the work. In common sense, no parents would like to help their children to resolve the work that because of their children too lazy to do it themself. As the development of modern life, parents are becoming more and more concern with the education and psychology of their children’s development, they do can handle how to help their children. For example, they are incline to encourage their children to deal with the work independently, or discus with their children to find the best measurement to solve the work, or teach their children the ability to face difficulty with spirit and courage. Furthermore, The encouragement and help from their parents inspire the children to do work more comprehensively and efficiently.


To sum up. Parent are the best mentor of children, also the closest people in the life, children can get courage and confidence with the encourage and help from their parents. From this reason , I can undoubtly conclude that agree that parent should help to children do work or encourage them to do their work independently.

heyxUID: 2943262

11# luckyryx

修改完了~~欢迎探讨！

我们是一个组的，记得帮我也改改~~谢谢啦！