8.31 进军美利坚的花花的作文

arimidyUID: 2673973

In the lecture, the professor disagrees with the idea presented in the reading material that the prescribed burning is not a good tool to prevent wildfire. The professor lists reasons as following.

First, the writer states that a prescribed burning itself would cause air pollution and contribute to global warming. The lecturer argues that the burning has advantages. It can reduce certain material to mineral rich ash, releasing and recycling nutrients. Also, it allows sunlight to shine in and warm water. In addition, it reduces wildfire hazard.

Second, the writer states the prescribed fire can be unpredictable and dangerous. The speakers disagrees it as saying that the burning has been employed for a long time and is safe because all the people participate in it are well trained. They are knowledgeable and considerable to burn safely and meet economical goals.

Third, the author thinks that the prescribed fire calls for a lot of money. In the listening material, the professor points out that the cost of prescribed burning is relatively small compared to the damage caused by a wildfire. When a wildfire appears, the cost will be 10 times higher than certain burning.

To sum up, the prescribed burning is an effective and economical practice to protect forest and safeguard we residents.

lagzxadrUID: 2576187

lag 评 0831 practice 5 我必须说~~好文章！用语简练，而且抓住了听力材料的主要信息，并建立了两个材料间的很好的联系~~~ In the lecture, the professor disagrees with the idea presented in the reading material that the prescribed burning is not a good tool to prevent wildfire. The professor lists reasons as following. 1 S# E2 \7 ~; F% q/ A3 B+ m9 t! P6 ^2 b/ N* @2 K1 P, A First, the writer states that a prescribed burning itself would cause air pollution and contribute to global warming. The lecturer argues that the burning has advantages. It can reduce certain material to mineral rich ash, releasing and recycling nutrients. Also, it allows sunlight to shine in and warm water. In addition, it reduces wildfire hazard.（这段信息提供的好完整呀，但是再稍微加一两句话，提一下prescribed burning的不可替代性就perfect了） 5 H; C* K7 k3 b3 J( J) F2 Q' U4 i+ ] Second, the writer states（避免重复，换个同义词吧） the prescribed fire can be unpredictable and dangerous. The speakers （手误了吧）disagrees it as saying that the burning has been employed for a long time and is safe because all the people （漏了个词who）participate in it are well trained. They are knowledgeable and considerable to burn safely and meet economical goals.3 p8 Y/ m; _( K& O3 Q . d4 I& ~( U# B% d" {, lThird, the author thinks that the prescribed fire calls for a lot of money. In the listening material, the professor points out that the cost of prescribed burning is relatively small compared to the damage caused by a wildfire. When a wildfire appears, the cost will be 10 times higher than certain burning. Thus，the cost of prescribed burning is worthwhile.(个人认为此处做一小结会令结构更紧密) ) p, @" n1 J, y+ }6 Y+ \) V# H' Z! s" s+ d0 [ To sum up, the prescribed burning is an effective and economical practice to protect forest and safeguard we residents.

fancywwUID: 2583671

In the lecture, the professor disagrees with the idea presented in the reading material that the prescribed burning is not a good tool to prevent wildfire. The professor lists reasons as following.& b8 R0 p9 }% v( K3 M: F5 c7 k

First, the writer states that a prescribed burning itself would cause air pollution and contribute to global warming. The lecturer argues that the burning has advantages. It can reduce certain material to mineral rich ash, releasing and recycling nutrients. Also, it allows sunlight to shine in and warm water. In addition, it reduces wildfire hazard.（这段信息提供的好完整呀，但是再稍微加一两句话，提一下prescribed burning的不可替代性就perfect了）嗯 同意，有必要对比一下disking没有这些好处

Second, the writer states（避免重复，换个同义词吧） the prescribed fire can be unpredictable and dangerous. The speakers （手误了吧）disagrees it as saying that the burning has been employed for a long time and is safe because all the people （漏了个词who）participate in it are well trained. 有点长了，拆成两句吧。They are knowledgeable and considerable to burn safely and meet economical goals.3 p8 Y/ m; _( K& O3 Q7 [" t$ h2 D" m& {: F* n
. I% r+ ]. @; w3 n5 v9 t  ?

Third, the author thinks that the prescribed fire calls for a lot of money. In the listening material, the professor points out that the cost of prescribed burning is relatively small compared to the damage caused by a wildfire. When a wildfire appears, the cost will be 10 times higher to fight the fire than certain burning (感觉比较专业的词还是不要替代了，就prescribed burning就好，文章中出现了那么多次，也只是在burning和fire中交替). Thus，the cost of prescribed burning is worthwhile.(个人认为此处做一小结会令结构更紧密)

To sum up, the prescribed burning is an effective and economical practice to protect forest and safeguard we residents. 感觉最后一段还是应该回到强调“听力批驳了阅读”的意思，而不要继续内容本身了。


写得很好，要点都写出来了，句子通畅，简洁明了。