综合作文进军美利坚——soarer0474

soarer0474UID: 2665789

谢谢批评
11.14
The material proposes that the introduced species have
more of a negative than a positive effect for three reasons. But the proffessor in the lecturer doubts that and holds the opinion that the alien species not necessarilly cause the harm.


Firstly, the speaker refute the statement in the material that the importing of species is always the main reason for the destruction of native species. It is ture that
they are more competitive for
catching food and accommodating. However, they are not the cause of the population reduction of the native species such as frogs, salamanders, mussels, and crayfishes in North America. Some research shows that it is actually because of the pollution.

Another important point made in the passage is that the imported species can upse the ecological balance. However, the lecture proposes a conflicting idea that the introduced species don't always haveto the have that kind of effect. In generally, they could benifit the local environment. For example, they could diversify the ecosystem of the region. But Cane toads is an exception. Under our carefully control, The advatages of importing outweigh the risks.

Finally, The professor says that the imported species are always good for the local economy, which contradict the counterpart in the material with the instance that
the imported specy,
mesquite, crowded out indigenous economic-valuable
species. She
take the mesquite, a specy introduced to Africa,
for example too. Not only it benefits the preventation of disertaion, but also it provide food for the local animals, as well as firewood for the people in the region.

soarer0474UID: 2665789

11.16人们应不应该被允许在公共交通（巴士、火车、飞机）上使用移动电话
9:04:16 PM
Nothing has made us more convenient to communicate with friends, especially ones far away, than mobile telephones. We could use it to connect with others almost anywhere and at any time, but about the implementing of a phone there is a controversy debated more and more that whether people should be allowed to use it on a public traffic. In my perspective, stopping the use of cell phones is unreasonable.
I must concede that it is impolite and somewhat crude when one talks loudly totally without considering the feeling of others in the same vehicle. After all, our society and sufficiently advanced education system couldn’t make sure all of the people considerate in public locations such as in a bus, train or a plane. Yet allowing people to make use of the mobile phones is not only reasonable but also desirable.
Nowadays cell phones play a very significant and irreplaceable role in our daily life, especially on our way to some other places. When on a long boring journey by train, we need the cell phones to talk with one of our intimate friends to kill time; before we go to the aim place, we need the mobile phones to tell the bosses or the clients where we are; when fly to another city for business, the merchants need cell phones to deal with a large amount of things. These part played by cell phones couldn’t be overlooked and hence forbidding them in public traffic could bring much inconvenience to most of people. One the other hand, the object that we invent these communicate equipments is to give us a chance to talk with others far away, particularly when we are on a moving traffic, such as a running bus. We could simply obtain that from the tools’ name “mobile phone”, in which “mobile” means movable. Consequently, if cell phones can’t be used on public vehicles, they will, to some extent, be useless for most of people.
What’s more, sometimes we have to employ mobile phones in urgency. Take the thing happened to me recently as a vivid example. Last week, I was sitting and a little asleep in a quiet bus, when suddenly a man’s phone rang up. I was woke up and felt in ill humor. Then the man said to the phone: ”Oh my god, my mother is in hospital? I will be there soon.” Only at that time, I am aware that the poor person had something emergency and thus forgave him. Thus if we forbid using mobile phones on the public traffic, it will bring much trouble to those who already have a unanticipated trouble in buses or planes.
To conclude, considering the convenience in daily life and the irreplaceable role in urgency situation of the use of cell phones in public traffic, we could safely draw the point that people should be allowed to employ cell phones in those vehicles. Meanwhile we shouldn’t neglect considering others’ feeling in the same public places and keep our talk from disturbing others much.

cinderella1016UID: 2666652

作文先放进word里，查语法和拼写错误，然后从名词单复数、动词及物不及物、主谓一致、分词、不定式、定语从句等角度检查自己的作文~~

不要有太强的依赖性，求人不如求己~

jill_eeUID: 2567710

请问楼上大大自己练多长时间才能来找板油互改作文呢……我一直自己闷着练了小半个月呀- -

soarer0474UID: 2665789

请问楼上大大自己练多长时间才能来找板油互改作文呢……我一直自己闷着练了小半个月呀- -
jill_ee 发表于 2009-11-17 11:22

应该可以了吧
大家互相改，互相学习吧

soarer0474UID: 2665789

恩，你说的很好
不过我确实自己也检查了，
不过看看别人的意见
3# cinderella1016

cinderella1016UID: 2666652

恩，你说的很好
不过我确实自己也检查了，
不过看看别人的意见
3# cinderella1016
soarer0474 发表于 2009-11-17 14:20

Are you sure?

soarer0474UID: 2665789

Are you sure?
cinderella1016 发表于 2009-11-17 14:23

en ,确实检查的不够
谢谢