综合写作

coxUID: 2730480

TOP 3W
  The lecturer raises the serious counter arguments against the author's opinion by providing drastically three different reasons regarding something consisitent of the way the woman in the portrait is dressed , unadaptable of some elements to fit together and  being  painted on a panel made of several pieces.
  While the statement in the reading paragraph is that the way the portrait is dressed  is consistent , the lecturer points out the fact that fur color was painted over the top of painting  after 100 years the painting was made, which can increas the painting's value .Therefore, the lady with a luxurious fur collar was made.   
  Contrary to the author's opinion that the elements of painting light and shadow do not fit together, the lecturer argue that this case is being misunderstood. Instead,once the fur color was removed with many years,the original color ,light and shadow,would  be on.Undoubtedly,the light color would reflect the face with partially shadow. That is to say ,the light and shadow is very realistic and part of the painting.
  Another equally aspect the lecturer raised is that  , and this directly contradict with the author's statement. The lecturer explains that after the first color was added ,the wood panel also had to be enlarged  to make itself more grand and valuable . Thus a whole piece of wood was cut into several small single pieces . Moreover a recent research has founded that some pieces with added color are from another painter of Rembrandt.
  So the statement in the reading paragraph is directly contradicted by the lecture and the lecturer's opinion has totally different ideas with the reading paragraph.

coxUID: 2730480

12.7
The lecturer raises the serious counterarguments against the author's opinions drastically by regarding the Chaco structures which was  residential ,
food storing and used as ceremonial centers.
  While the statement raised in the reading paragraph that the Chaco structures were purely residential, the lecturer points out the fact that if hundreds of people live in Chaco Canyon, there would be many remains of fire work.However, there are few fire places .Moreover, it is big enough for hundreds of people to live in.Therefore, it is impossible that the Chaco structures was residential.
  Contrary to the author's opinion that the Chaco structures were used to store food supplies, the lecturer argues that this case never happened. Instead, it is uncovered by maizes or maiz containors.If there was used for storing maiz, it is impossible that there arenot remains of maizes or remains of big containors.So there would not be stored.
  Another equally aspect raised by the lecturer is that pots and meal arenot good evindence that there was a ceremonial center , and this directly contradict with the reading passage. There many construction remains, and the pots and meal may be used for the construction workers.
  So ,the statment in the reading paragraph was directly contradicted by the lecturer and the lecturer has totally different ideas with the reading paragraph.

半夏之北UID: 2517498

The lecturer raises the serious counter arguments against the author's opinion by providing drastically three different reasons regarding something consisitent of the way the woman in the portrait is dressed , unadaptable of some elements to fit together and  being  painted on a panel made of several pieces.
  While the statement in the reading paragraph is that the way the portrait is dressed  is consistent（inconsistent） , the lecturer points out the fact that fur color was painted over the top of painting  after 100 years the painting was made, which can increas the painting's value .Therefore, the lady with a luxurious fur collar was made.  
  Contrary to the author's opinion that the elements of painting light and shadow do not fit together, the lecturer argue that this case is being misunderstood. Instead,once the fur color was removed with many years（这句是什么意思？）,the original color ,light and shadow,would  be on.Undoubtedly,the light color would reflect the face with partially shadow. That is to say ,the light and shadow is very realistic and part of the painting.
  Another equally aspect the lecturer raised is that  , and this directly contradict with the author's statement. The lecturer explains that after the first color was added ,the wood panel also had to be enlarged  to make itself more grand and valuable . Thus a whole piece of wood was cut into several small single pieces（听力里面说的是除去那些后来加上的，他的画的材料是一个完整的wood panel） . Moreover a recent research has founded that some pieces with added color are from another painter of Rembrandt(这一句不对，听力里面说的是原始的那幅画的材料和这个人另一幅画的材料都是从一棵树上来的).
  So the statement in the reading paragraph is directly contradicted by the lecture and the lecturer's opinion has totally different ideas with the reading paragraph.
听力听得不太仔细，阅读内容有点多了，可以多写点听力的内容~~
加油↖(^ω^)↗