寄托天下
查看: 3473|回复: 28
打印 上一主题 下一主题

[未归类] 进军美利坚 how_hq作文发帖 [复制链接]

Rank: 2

声望
4
寄托币
284
注册时间
2009-6-4
精华
0
帖子
4
跳转到指定楼层
楼主
发表于 2010-3-2 23:02:52 |只看该作者 |倒序浏览
3月2号 (08.5.17)8 {- d$ X. I+ n0 V
It's better to watch serious movies to get deeper think or watch movies that amuse or entertain you


As the development of the movie industry go booming, today there have a large number of movies crush into our society which leads to a increasing concentration on the debate that how to make the decision to select the type of the movie’s criterion, such as serious movies or amused movies. With different personal systems, people would maintain diverse opinions. Maybe some people would argue for standpoint that enjoying funny shows could stir up entertainment and bring about relaxation for humanity; nonetheless, some other would stick to the viewpoint of choosing serious films. As far as I am concerned, considerable though the advantages that the movie dedicatedly amusing people enjoy are, they cannot compete with the benefits that the thoughtful movies produce, when perception and inspiration of movie are taken into account.

To start up, these movies that are entirely devoted to explore serious themes can improve human perception on how to clearly how to absorb the experience from the history and how to advance the development of the society. For example, when enjoying “Schindler’s List” which is one of the most brilliant Oscar films, people could really experience what an extremely horrible behavior the Jews encounter from Hitler who unreasonably slaughtered hundreds of thousands of innocent Jews due to his terrible racism in the Second World War. It is this thoughtful movie that we can only learn a lesson how dangerous the racism is and adjust the headway of humanity. Therefore, it is necessary for the people to taste the thoughtful movies for the admonishment from the history.

Another advantage of serious movies is that people can acquire numerous inspirations from these films when people fall into the depression, failure and frustration. Some of serious movies mainly invent a suitable plot to depict how the people do their best to fight against the difficulty. “The Terminal” is an excellent example which describes a man who adherently wanted to arrive the United State but unfortunately was refuted by the censor. This man kept his insistence and tried again and again every day and finally was verified to go to his terminal. From this simple but meaningful story can we recognize the significance of insistence which can lighten the dark of the failure in human life. Undoubtedly, serious movies play an influential role in our life.

Admittedly, it is unusually hard to ignore merits of the movies which focus on the amusement and entertainment of humanity. One most beneficial efficiency of these films is to bring about the recreation. For instance, never can we forget laughing when saw Mr. Bean in the denture clinic in the “Mr. Bean” film which is best for relieving the anxiety, eliminating the boredom and stirring up the pleasant.

In a conclusion, although there maybe some advantages of funny movies; nevertheless, I believe that there are far more advantages of serious movies. Obviously, serious movies can not only let us know more about the truth and experience of history but also act as a beacon to enlighten the headway of life what are difficult for the common people to perceive. For the entertainment, there has some other ways to get, such as shopping and touring.
0 0

使用道具 举报

Rank: 2

声望
4
寄托币
284
注册时间
2009-6-4
精华
0
帖子
4
沙发
发表于 2010-3-4 01:04:43 |只看该作者
to armstrong

Feng xiaogang, a famous and popular film director in China, said (I paraphrase) :" the different types of movies have their own functions and we can not praise or criticize any a type of a special l movie  based on our values." It  vividly describes  the issue as whether serious movies is better than other. As far as I am concerned, We can benefit from what  get people to think deeper. At the same time, funny film can also enrich our daily  life.  

To begin with, people can study  more strong spirit to encourage their life and working from serious movie. Generally, the serious movie pass  the sense of "never-give up" to people. Therefore, through the incentive, people would tend to improve their working or academic performance in everyday. It is true that some classic movie have so amazing effect with influencing a individual positively. For example , When I entered into university as a freshman, I failed to find my aims and keep hurrying life style because the leisure life is my pursuit. But  it is horrible in spiritual level since no any material or immediate assignment can attract me attention. However, after watching the movie, pursuit of happiness, I impressed by the hero chris deeply. Under the harsh environment, the hero insisted on his dream and protected it. As a result, he achieved his aim as a successful broke. There are so many examples as the life of a individual is changed by a serious movie.

Secondly, some formal or serious movies have educating meaning for our society. some types involving in Second world war tell people the fact that war is disaster for human. After watching homeless, children who lost his parents, women murdered by soldier,  people will embrace sense to hate war. So, to some extent, film can indoctrinate some values which are difficult to impart.  

However, we can not deny the positive effect of humorous or funny movie. these are good recreational source to make people relax. Today, with the high pace of working or study, the pressure from outer environment is increasing. how to remove or reduce the stress is a hot issue. through some movies, they provides a entertainment opportunities for people. So, people can keep their concentration on work again.

1.        好像托福作文必须要你做出一个选择,然之后表明自己为什么要这样,而你好像没有给出明确选择
2.        在你的第二段论证的时候,例子说的太长了,不够简练,要说的重点,其次没有在最后对例子进行评价
3.        你的第三段论论证没有例子去支持感觉好像在空谈
4.        最后少了一个总结

使用道具 举报

Rank: 2

声望
4
寄托币
284
注册时间
2009-6-4
精华
0
帖子
4
板凳
发表于 2010-3-4 11:43:15 |只看该作者
"responsible for this negative impact"

in the past five year, especially in 2009, the living environment of humanity become more and more deteriorated, such as global warming and ozone hole, which stirs up a widespread discussion on whether scientists should be responsible for this negative impact from their discoveries. The majority of the people maintain the point that scientists should be guilty for their attainment; nevertheless, other people hold the contrast idea. As far as I am concerned, considerable though the defects that scientists’ discoveries enjoy are, they cannot compete with the merits of those discoveries, when intension and contribution of scientist are taken into account.

To begin with, it is active and beneficial that purposes of scientists’ exploration. According to the principle of the law, judging the guilty of the human beings should mainly take more deliberation on their intentions, the same as in the science. Obviously, the original purposes of scientist are aim for stretching out the phenomena of the nature, exploring the law of the society and advancing the development of the humanity. Madam Curie, a brilliant chemist who firstly found the Radium, is a typical example. Her primary invention of the Radium did not serve for the nuclear weapon but just to find out more useful chemical substance and the principle of the chemical word. Can we convict that Madam Curie is guilty? Therefore, we can arbitrarily attribute these negative effects to scientists.

Even though the discoveries of scientists have indirectly negative effect on today social problems, there are far more advantages of their contribution. As is well known, nothing in the world is entirely perfect. We cannot entirely deprive the merit of the discovery for our society. Scientists’ explorations play a significant role in human beings development. For instance, Watt, an eminent science, devised the first steam engine which made a huge influence for the further automobile. Without the discovery of the steam engine, maybe today efficient cars will disappear in our world. History abounds with all kinds of the significant examples.

Who should be responsible for the horrible impact? If consider meticulously, we easily realize the radical reason of these negative problems. It is the people themselves who extremely abuse the scientist discovery. Looking back the Watt’s steam engine, we can easily find that the air pollution is not due to the engine themselves but people’s abuse of the cars and neglect of the environmental protection. Another reason of the negative effect is that people unjustly and maliciously employ scientists’ exploration. like, Madam Curie’s Radium is just for researching the law of the world; nonetheless, today people entangle it into the produce of the nuclear weapon. When human beings blindly enjoy the attainment of scientist, isn’t it necessary that they should more consideration the negative impact will bring up?

In conclusion, scientists completely intent to the research of the nature and the improvement of the society and their discoveries make great contribution the development of the human beings. For the negative problem, It is not the scientists but the people themselves who should take this responsibility.

使用道具 举报

Rank: 2

声望
4
寄托币
284
注册时间
2009-6-4
精华
0
帖子
4
地板
发表于 2010-3-6 12:36:19 |只看该作者
本帖最后由 howard_hhq 于 2010-3-7 00:49 编辑

3.5
Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Most people prefer having other people make decisions for them rather than making decisions by themselves。

With the development of the society, today, there are more and more information crushes into our life. How to select this information to make a decision has sparked a widespread debate over the whole society. The majority of the people agree that the increasing growth of people decision were made by others; nevertheless, some other people cast doubt on this agreement. As far as I am concerned, the numerous decisions of people are taken by themselves due to the characteristic of person and the judgment of the decision.

To begin with, the decision of people made by them is the most suitable for people improvement and development and those decisions provided by other are more or less different or even in contrast with people interest. Thus, it is obviously that taking themselves opinions can make more benefit for their problems. The consequence of A psychology survey which conducted by the CSSI (Chinese Society and Science Institution) could perfectly supports the intension of the human. This survey clearly demonstrates that 87% of the people prefer the decision for themselves. From this scientific data could we easily conclude that people already tend to do something from their condition. Another instance from my philosophy professor could also reinforce the survey conclusion. He once instructed to us that (I pararias) from themselves characteristic could the people succeed.

Admittedly, It is hard to ignore the commonplace phenomenon that plenty of people do the same thing just as their friends suggested. Nonetheless, if taking more deeply consideration, we could promptly realize that it is also people intentions that conduct their behaviors. Undoubtedly, today people always encounter more and more terrible problem and it is difficult for people to overcome themselves which makes them have to consort to their friends’ opinion. After people get some many advices, they should firstly consider themselves condition completely and then select the best opinion to adjust through their characteristic and finally make the final decision. if a decision is processed by people themselves, it is people themselves not others, even the original one, that belongs to this decision. Lincoln, the brilliant president of Unite State, is a typical example. During the civil war, there are all kinds of suggestions on whether to fight against the colonist from the wise advisors. Deliberating the real condition and benefit of the country Lincoln finally agreed on the war which is the most significant decision for the United State and is also Lincoln's decision. He just said that selecting the decision is far more difficult than creating a decision. Therefore selecting the advices from friends is also people themselves decision.

In conclusion, people always make their decisions by themselves not from others.

使用道具 举报

Rank: 9Rank: 9Rank: 9

声望
1070
寄托币
28954
注册时间
2009-11-27
精华
4
帖子
668

荣誉版主 寄托与我 Sagittarius射手座 Golden Apple

5
发表于 2010-3-6 22:14:56 |只看该作者
"responsible for this negative impact"

+ j" m
in the past five year, especially in 2009, the living environment of humanity become more and more deteriorated, such as global warming and ozone hole, which stirs up a widespread discussion on whether scientists should be responsible for this negative impact from their discoveries. (我觉得内容要过渡一下,怎么环境恶化就跟科学家产生了联系呢)The majority of the people maintain the point that scientists should be guilty for their attainment; nevertheless, other people hold the contrast idea. As far as I am concerned, considerable though the defects that scientists’ discoveries enjoy are, they cannot compete with the merits of those discoveries, when intension and contribution of scientist are taken into account.

" j
To begin with, it is active and beneficial that purposes of scientists’ exploration.(赞) According to the principle of the law, judging the guilty of the human beings should mainly take more deliberation on their intentions, the same as in the science. Obviously, the original purposes of scientist are aim for stretching out the phenomena of the nature, exploring the law of the society and advancing the development of the humanity. Madam Curie, a brilliant chemist who firstly found the Radium, is a typical example. Her primary invention of the Radium did not serve for the nuclear weapon but just to find out more useful chemical substance and the principle of the chemical word. Can we convict that Madam Curie is guilty? Therefore, we can arbitrarily attribute these negative effects to scientists.

Even though the discoveries of scientists have indirectly negative effect on today social problems, there are far more advantages of their contribution. As is well known, nothing in the world is entirely perfect. We cannot entirely deprive the merit of the discovery for our society. Scientists’ explorations play a significant role in human beings development. For instance, Watt, an eminent science, devised the first steam engine which made a huge influence for the further automobile. Without the discovery of the steam engine, maybe today efficient cars will disappear in our world. History abounds with all kinds of the significant examples.

Who should be responsible for the horrible impact? If consider meticulously, we easily realize the radical reason of these negative problems. It is the people themselves who extremely abuse the scientist discovery.赞 Looking back the Watt’s steam engine, we can easily find that the air pollution is not due to the engine themselves but people’s abuse of the cars and neglect of the environmental protection. Another reason of the negative effect is that people unjustly and maliciously employ scientists’ exploration. like, Madam Curie’s Radium is just for researching the law of the world; nonetheless, today people entangle it into the produce of the nuclear weapon. When human beings blindly enjoy the attainment of scientist, isn’t it necessary that they should more consideration the negative impact will bring up? % {( y' O/ ?, D

In conclusion, scientists completely intent to the research of the nature and the improvement of the society and their discoveries make great contribution the development of the human beings. For the negative problem, It is not the scientists but the people themselves who should take this responsibility.
童鞋是不是考过G啊?句子流畅,逻辑啊结构啊什么的都很好,有细节也有例子。。。赞
博观而约取,厚积而薄发

使用道具 举报

Rank: 3Rank: 3

声望
7
寄托币
893
注册时间
2009-8-2
精华
0
帖子
106
6
发表于 2010-3-7 00:04:53 |只看该作者
3.5 修改

3.5amendment.doc

20 KB, 下载次数: 8

使用道具 举报

Rank: 2

声望
4
寄托币
284
注册时间
2009-6-4
精华
0
帖子
4
7
发表于 2010-3-7 20:12:17 |只看该作者
3.7
Human needs for farmland, housing, and industry are more important than saving land for endangered animals.


According to the Chinese Daily newspaper, today hundreds of the species will be extinct in the earth since the human being needs take up the land of animals , which sparks a widespread discussion that which is more important for the society, Human needs or the endanger animals. Some people believe that the land of animals is more significant than the human needs. Nevertheless, some others cast doubt down to this opinion. As far as I am concerned, I hold the viewpoint that it is the human needs that are crucial for our society due to taking more consideration on the human survival and development.

To begin with, it is the human needs, such as farmland, industry and so forth, that support the basically survival necessity of the human being. Without these necessity, people are extremely difficult to survive in society, even would disappear in the earth. The history of the human is a typical example. When human beings just appear in the earth, they have nothing to fight against the difficulty from the nature. However, after people start to realize that human should struggle for the needs of the necessity, they just could protect themselves well. If human being lost the basic needs, maybe we have die out from the world in the past. Therefore, human needs could provide the basic material of the life.

What is more, human needs provide the substance for the development of the society. it is hard to improve your living condition and advance your economical development without the support of the substance. This is why today China dedicates itself total energy and resource to improve the economic development which is benefit from the needs of human being. My hometown is another good example. It is obviously that in the five years ago there were few televisions and cars in my hometown. Since the local government increased the needs of the people, such as building the factories, extending the road and constructing the environment of the business. Today people in our hometown almost have their own televisions and cars. Thus, without the human needs it is almost impossible for human to progress.

Admittedly, we can be blind to the importance of the land of endanger animal, especially nowadays. Since the abuse of the land for farmland and industry the living place of the animal is dramatically threatened, which would lead to the extinction of the animal. The disappearance of the animal will in turn to do harm to our human being, like the damage of the ecosystem balance and deterioration of the environment. Therefore, it is necessary, even responsible for human to protect the land of animal, especially the endanger animals.

In conclusion, the human need is just the significant keystone for our society because the human should survive and develop.

使用道具 举报

Rank: 2

声望
30
寄托币
885
注册时间
2008-7-17
精华
0
帖子
7
8
发表于 2010-3-7 22:29:18 |只看该作者
With the development of the society, today, there are more and more information crushes into our life. How to select this information to make a decision has sparked a widespread debate over the whole society. The majority of the people agree that the increasing growth of people's decisions were made by others; nevertheless, some other people cast doubt on this agreement. As far as I am concerned, the numerous decisions of people are taken(made) by themselves due to the characteristic of person and the judgment of the decision.

- {" f! y/ ~" S
To begin with, the decision of people made by them is the most suitable for people's improvement and development(或者换成 to improve and develop) and (句子有点长了,要不用moreover直接分开好了)those decisions provided by others are more or less different or even in contrast with people's interest. Thus, it is obviously that taking themselves opinions can make more benefit for their problems. The consequence of A psychology survey which conducted by the CSSI (Chinese Society and Science Institution) (这个我记住了,以后也用这个编,(*^__^*) 嘻嘻……)could perfectly supports the intension of the human. This survey clearly demonstrates that 87% of the people prefer the decision (made by) themselves. From this scientific data could we easily conclude that people already tend to do something from their condition. Another instance from my philosophy professor could also reinforce the survey conclusion. He once instructed to us that (I pararias) from themselves characteristic could the people succeed.

Admittedly, It is hard to ignore the commonplace phenomenon that plenty of people do the same thing just as their friends suggested. Nonetheless, if taking more deeply consideration, we could promptly realize that it is also people intentions that conduct their behaviors. Undoubtedly, today people always encounter more and more terrible problems and it is difficult for people to overcome themselves which makes them have to consort to their friends’ opinion. After people get some many (some many 不太对啊,advice是不可数名词)advices, they should firstly consider themselves(their) conditions completely and then select the best opinion to adjust through their characteristic and finally make the final decision. if a decision is processed by people themselves, it is people themselves not others, even the original one, that belongs to this decision. Lincoln, the brilliant president of Unite State, is a typical example. During the civil war, there are all kinds of suggestions on whether to fight against the colonist from the wise advisors. Deliberating the real condition and benefit of the country Lincoln finally agreed on the war which is the most significant decision for the United State and is also Lincoln's decision. He just said that selecting the decision is far more difficult than creating a decision. Therefore selecting the advices from friends is also people themselves decision.
让步太长了啊......
In conclusion, people always make their decisions by themselves not from others.
例子都举得挺好的~~注意单复数和代词还有连接词的使用。结构上你支持的一面论证太少了,让步太多了,如果让步的话一般都是要有两段是正面的,然后才是让步。一家之言,仅供参考
I forsee the dark ahead if i stay

使用道具 举报

Rank: 2

声望
12
寄托币
299
注册时间
2009-5-21
精华
0
帖子
1
9
发表于 2010-3-8 22:46:20 |只看该作者
本帖最后由 cp19880313 于 2010-3-8 22:49 编辑

3.7修改
Human needs for farmland, housing, and industry are more important than saving land for endangered animals.
According to the Chinese Daily newspaper, today删掉 hundreds of the species will be extinct in the earth since the human beings need to take up the land of animals , which sparks a widespread discussion about which is more important for the society, Human
need or the endangered animals. Some people believe that the land of animals is more significant than the human needs. Nevertheless, some others cast doubt down to this opinion. As far as I am concerned, I hold the viewpoint that it is the human need that are crucial for our society due to taking more consideration on the human survival and development.
感觉第一段其实有些话没必要说,说了反倒是罗嗦了。
To begin with, it is the human needs, such as farmland, industry and so forth, that support the basically survival necessity of the human beings. Without these necessity, people are extremely difficult to survive in society, even would disappear in the earth. The history of the human is a typical example. When human beings just appear in the earth, they have nothing to fight against the difficulty from the nature. However, after people started to realize that human should struggle for the needs of the necessity, they just could protect themselves well. If human being lost the basic needs, maybe we have died out from the world in the past. Therefore, human needs could provide the basic material of the life.

What is more, human needs provide the substance for the development of the society. it is hard to improve your living condition and advance your economical development without the support of the substance. This is why today China dedicates itself total energy and resource to improve the economic development which is benefit from the needs of human being. My hometown is another good example. It is obviously that
five years ago there were few televisions and cars in my hometown. Since the local government increased the needs of the people, such as building the factories, extending the road and constructing the environment of the business. Today people in our hometown almost have their own televisions and cars. Thus, without the human needs it is almost impossible for human to progress.

Admittedly, we can be blind to the importance of the land of endanger animal, especially nowadays. Since the abuse of the land for farmland and industry the living place of the animal is dramatically threatened, which would lead to the extinction of the animal. The disappearance of the animal will in turn to do harm to our human being, like the damage of the ecosystem balance and deterioration of the environment. Therefore, it is necessary, even responsible for human to protect the land of animal, especially the endanger animals.

In conclusion, the human need is just the significant keystone for our society because the human should survive and develop
你的观点是应该建房子工厂,但你第三个论点又说应该保护endangered animals land 那我认为你应该在第一段明确说,可以用地,但不应该占用endangered animals land。 否则会让人认为你写得自相矛盾了。
感觉每个论点并没有展开,而是重复着几句话,我认为似乎应该再展开些会更好些。

使用道具 举报

Rank: 2

声望
4
寄托币
284
注册时间
2009-6-4
精华
0
帖子
4
10
发表于 2010-3-9 10:02:48 |只看该作者
本帖最后由 howard_hhq 于 2010-3-9 10:03 编辑

3.8 Universities should give every member of the teamthe same grade when the team finishes a project.

How to give the grade for the student in a team, the same grade or the different grade? this problem stir up a widespeard disscuion in the universtiy. Some people believe that it is necessary for the professor to give the equal score for the teamate due to the fairness. Nevertheless, some other cast doubt to this opinion. As far as I am concerned, I agree that professor should take the variation of the grade into the team project because of considering the stimulation and the sloth in the teamwork.

To begin with, the variation of the score among the student in the same team can bring the stimulation for student to do a better work in the team. if realizing that the different grade is judged from their real work, student would obtain the power to finish more tasks and do better in the job since these effort can make them get a better score, when their score are promoted, their ability also were dramaticly improved. The experiment of the tiger in SiChuan National Park is the typical example. In this experiment, two groups of tigers were breeded with different method. one group of tigers were given the same food individually in a cape. However, the other group of tigers were given the food together which let them to compete with the food. after a long time breed. two group tigers were free to the wild forest and the result is tigers with the same food were hardy to suvive in the wild, in contrast, the other group tiger can better fit for the environment of the wild due to their were trained to compete. Obviously, the food is just as the grade and the tiger as the students. different grade can let the student develop better.

What is more, the same grade could probably leads to the growth of the sloth in the team. when some students take for granted that they can get the same score form the teacher without the effort, they would tend to relax themselves with the lazy sence. for example, in my Computer System project, since the policy of the same scores, one teammate in my team just play the game all day time and never care about the process of our project and finally he also get the same score as the hard-work fellow. Certainly, If the same grade policy goes on, there would be more and more slutters exist in our university.

While some student would argue that it is difficult for the professor to check the effort of the student from a team and the professor would make the mistake to judge the wrong score for the hard work student, so the same grade method is rational for the team. This is a good issue to realize. However, if the process of the judging is inplment more delibrately and compelely, like the delicate record of workload, the sufficient describtion of the task, would the professor check the wrong score? Absolutely not. The "inequality" of the score would let the team become more equality.

In conclusion, the variation of the grade could bring about benefit for the student improment and development, elimate the sloth in the team and bring the true fairness for the university.

使用道具 举报

Rank: 4

声望
35
寄托币
1225
注册时间
2008-12-24
精华
0
帖子
11
11
发表于 2010-3-9 18:56:24 |只看该作者
How to give the grade for the student in a team, the same grade or the different grade? This problem stirs up a widespread discussion in the university. Some people believe that it is necessary for the professor to give the equal score for the teammate due to the fairness. Nevertheless, some other cast doubt to this opinion. As far as I am concerned, I agree that professor should take the variation of the grade into the team project because of considering the stimulation and the sloth一个是激励 一个是懒惰,怪怪的 in the teamwork." B6 q/ L3 s! F/ H: ]3 x$ p
: L, T# q3 Z/ c6 e
To begin with, the variation of the score among the student in the same team can bring the stimulation for student to do a better work in the team. if realizing that the different grade is judged from their real work, student would obtain the power to finish more tasks and do better in the job since these effort can make them get a better score, when their score are promoted, their ability also were dramatically improved. The experiment of the tiger in Sichuan National Park is the typical example. In this experiment, two groups of tigers were bred with different method. One group of tigers was given the same food individually in a cape. However, the other group of tigers was given the food together which let them to compete with the food. After a long time breed. two group tigers were free to the wild forest and the result is tigers with the same food were hardy to survive
in the wild, in contrast, the other group tiger can better fit for the environment of the wild due to their were trained to compete. Obviously, the food is just as the grade and the tiger as the students. Different grade can let the student develop better.
% u6 T6 E5 S4 e5 i
" J/ ~8 n' f" p7 }! @- c- u$ ^# N8 w7 KWhat is more, the same grade could probably leads to the growth of the sloth in the team. When some students take for granted that they can get the same score form the teacher without the effort, they would tend to relax themselves with the lazy
sense. for example, in my Computer System project, since the policy of the same scores, one teammate in my team just play the game all day time and never care about the process of our project and finally he also get the same score as the hard-work fellow. Certainly, if the same grade policy goes on, there would be more and more slutters(what’s this?)
exist in our university.
5 A$ m! K' I2 a! J  Q4 h4 h
2 I2 h5 b. r" ?  ?' c
While some student would argue that it is difficult for the professor to check the effort of the student from a team and the professor would make the mistake to judge the wrong score for the hard work student, so the same grade method is rational for the team. This is a good issue to realize. However, if the process of the judging is implement more deliberately and completely, like the delicate record of workload, the sufficient description
of the task, would the professor check the wrong score? Absolutely not. The "inequality" of the score would let the team become more equality.
7 t. e+ D3 Y7 U: a  f2 e5 ]) g! I
) [9 u5 n7 }" m( z3 r- eIn conclusion, the variation of the grade could bring about benefit for the student
improvement and development, diminish the sloth in the team and bring the true fairness for the university.


建议楼主写完后用word查下写错的单词 这样子才能记住哟
例子很好,很赞
加油。。楼主词汇量挺大的哈

使用道具 举报

Rank: 2

声望
4
寄托币
284
注册时间
2009-6-4
精华
0
帖子
4
12
发表于 2010-3-10 10:08:46 |只看该作者
3.9
Many teachers assign homework to students every day. Do you think that daily homework is necessary for students? Use specific reasons and details to support your answer.


Whether the teacher should assign the daily homework for the students? this issue sparks a widespread discussion in the society. some people believe that students should take more the homework. Nevertheless, some other cast doubt down to this opinion. As far as I am concerned, considerable though adavantages the daily homework enjoys are, this opinion hardly compete with the merits of less daily homeworks, when the health and the interest are taken into consideration.

Admittedly, it is hardly to neglect that the daily homework could also bring some benefits for the students. daily homework can let the students to acquire more knowledge. the best way of increasing knowledge is the a large amout of praticing and study. Also, dayil homework could also increase the ability of the study which is extremely good for their furture education.

Nevetheless, the daily homework would do harm to the health of the students. it is obviously that students could only do nothing but take all their time and energy to finish their teacher assignmen which will lead to the time of  doing exercise be deprived. A recent survey which is conducted by the CSSI (Chinese  Society and Scence Institution) demostrates that less than average one hour time is left for Chinese children to build their body because of the heavy daily work, which leads to the state level of the health dramaticaly decrease. From this scientific data we could realize how the daily homeworks destroy the health of the Chinese children.
Therefore, teachers should take more attention on students health not always the study and the assignment.

What is more, the daily homwork prevent the students from cultivating the interest which would restrain their comprehensive ability from developing. it is due to the heavy daily homework that students have to shelf their interets and struggle to finish their tasks. My cousin is the typical example. two years age my cousin was pretty interesting in the guitar and claimed that one day he  wanted to be a briliant guitarist. Nevertheless, this winter vocation I visited my cousin, I supringly find that he had lost the interest in the guitar because he had no time to pratice and play since he had to devote his all day only to the assignment. My cousin expeirence again attests the negative effect of the daily homework for the cultivation of the interest and the development. Thus, we should also focus on the entire development of the students but not only the intelligence.

In conclusion, although there are many merits for the daily homework, however the goodness of the less homework is far more than the daily homework, since  the less homework could not only bring the health for the students but also let the students have more time to cultivate their interests and improve their development.

使用道具 举报

Rank: 2

声望
0
寄托币
118
注册时间
2009-10-9
精华
0
帖子
5
13
发表于 2010-3-10 16:54:47 |只看该作者
3.9* E9 ?9 m4 }+ Y. G, n3 k6 J/ H# R0 X0 j
Many teachers assign homework to students every day. Do you think that daily homework is necessary for students? Use specific reasons and details to support your answer.


Whether the teacher should assign the daily homework for the students? this issue sparks a widespread discussion in the society. some people believe that students should take more the homework. Nevertheless, some other cast doubt down to this opinion. As far as I am concerned, considerable though adavantages the daily homework enjoys are, this opinion hardly compete with the merits好词 of less daily homeworks, when the health and the interest are taken into consideration.( e/ W  B% G. Z' |, r3 x! ^

Admittedly, it is hardly to neglect that the daily homework could also bring some benefits for the students. daily homework can let the students to acquire more knowledge. the best way of increasing knowledge is the a large amout of praticing and study. Also, dayil homework could also increase the ability of the study which is extremely good for their furture education
第一段的观点是肯定daily homework。。。。。可以这么写吗?不能这么写吧。。。。。。我承认我有点八股,这不就和你的TS相反了嘛。。。。。。。要是表达以退为进的主旨的话,这个意思应该放在第一段我认为比较好。., L% o% l! }+ k4 O& z! ~
" [1 j4 R: u. B3 b; G& Z
Nevetheless, the daily homework would do harm to the health of the students. it is obviously that students could only do nothing but take all their time and energy to finish their teacher assignmen which will lead to the time of  doing exercise being deprived. A recent survey which is conducted by the CSSI (Chinese  Society and Scence Institution) demostrates that less than average one hour time
不通顺。。。。。。 is left for Chinese children to build their body because of the heavy daily work, which leads to the state level of the health dramaticaly decrease. From this scientific data we could realize how the daily homeworks destroy the health of the Chinese children. ! w% a  L' }& e$ ^( H( _
Therefore, teachers should take more attention on students health not always the study and the assignment.

What is more, the daily homwork prevent the students from cultivating the interest which would restrain their comprehensive ability from developing. it is due to the heavy daily homework that students have to shelf their interets and
but to finishing their tasks struggly struggle to finish their tasks. My cousin is the typical example. two years age my cousin was pretty interesting in the guitar and claimed that one day he  wanted to be a briliant guitarist. Nevertheless, this winter vocation I visited my cousin, I supringly find that he had lost the interest in the guitar because he had no time to pratice and play since he had to devote his all day only to the assignment. My cousin expeirence again attests the negative effect of the daily homework for the cultivation of the interest and the development. Thus, we should also focus on the entire development of the students but not only the intelligence.4 n+ J+ ~" w% O7 H  V0 I


! V! W  s6 K, S' l. I& F
In conclusion, although there are many merits for the daily homework, however the goodness of the less homework is far more than the daily homework, since  the less homework could not only bring the health for the students but also let the students have more time to cultivate their interests and improve their development.


厄,比我写的好多了,例子也很有说服力,学习学习之。。。。。。。

使用道具 举报

Rank: 4

声望
68
寄托币
1236
注册时间
2008-10-9
精华
0
帖子
3
14
发表于 2010-3-10 19:03:29 |只看该作者
本帖最后由 speedzshaw 于 2010-3-10 19:04 编辑

3.9 修改 by speedzshaw

3.9 by howard_hhq.rar

15.19 KB, 下载次数: 1

Free your ambitious mind and learn the art of dying.

使用道具 举报

Rank: 2

声望
4
寄托币
284
注册时间
2009-6-4
精华
0
帖子
4
15
发表于 2010-3-11 11:08:49 |只看该作者
3.10
Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? People can benefit more from traveling in their own country than traveling to foreign countries.

Which place would you to travel, the own country or the foreign country? With different personal systems, people would maintain different opinion. Some would believe that traveling own country can bring more benefit. Nonetheless, some other would cast doubt down to this view. As far as I am concerned, the merits of enjoying the exotic country would outweigh the ones of own place.

To begin with, enjoying the foreign country could bring people a completely new life style which is definitely good for the relaxation and development of personal characteristic. According to a approval analysis from CSSI (Chinese Society and Science Institution), the reverse environment could stir up people curious sense and entirely releasing mood which could totally eliminate the pressure from people daily life and
stimulate the passion to explore the new world. Obviously, the unusual life of the exotic life could act as a improvable enzyme. For example, when people who have been living in a noisy and dirty city for a long, long time, they would be surprising and satisfied by Sweden's pure condition, serene environment and gorgeous sense, throwing away all the pressure and exploring into this comfortable world.


What's more, from the exotic country can people experience different kinds of culture which could also improve the living level of people, since this mysterious culture could fill the blank of the single feeling of the world. For instance, when people immerse all into the society of the United State, observe the unlimited behavior of local people and inspect the Statue of Liberty, they can certainly realize how significant the culture of freedom are in the whole American. After that the conception of the liberty would root in people life which is hardy savored in the own country.

Admittedly, it is impossible to ignore the benefit from traveling own country. Clearly, making the journey would cost less money and time so people can spend the same strength to tour more resorts. Also, it is more convenient for the people to make their trip. People could fully exploited their weekend for wondering around their country.

In conclusion, although traveling own country holds many advantages, but the merits of the foreign country are far more than them, since the extreme lure of the mysterious life style and the new culture.

使用道具 举报

RE: 进军美利坚 how_hq作文发帖 [修改]

问答
Offer
投票
面经
最新
精华
转发
转发该帖子
进军美利坚 how_hq作文发帖
https://bbs.gter.net/thread-1066157-1-1.html
复制链接
发送
回顶部