- 最后登录
- 2019-7-1
- 在线时间
- 2048 小时
- 寄托币
- 28954
- 声望
- 1070
- 注册时间
- 2009-11-27
- 阅读权限
- 100
- 帖子
- 668
- 精华
- 4
- 积分
- 28950
- UID
- 2731389
  
- 声望
- 1070
- 寄托币
- 28954
- 注册时间
- 2009-11-27
- 精华
- 4
- 帖子
- 668
|
"responsible for this negative impact"
+ j" m
in the past five year, especially in 2009, the living environment of humanity become more and more deteriorated, such as global warming and ozone hole, which stirs up a widespread discussion on whether scientists should be responsible for this negative impact from their discoveries. (我觉得内容要过渡一下,怎么环境恶化就跟科学家产生了联系呢)The majority of the people maintain the point that scientists should be guilty for their attainment; nevertheless, other people hold the contrast idea. As far as I am concerned, considerable though the defects that scientists’ discoveries enjoy are, they cannot compete with the merits of those discoveries, when intension and contribution of scientist are taken into account.
" j
To begin with, it is active and beneficial that purposes of scientists’ exploration.(赞) According to the principle of the law, judging the guilty of the human beings should mainly take more deliberation on their intentions, the same as in the science. Obviously, the original purposes of scientist are aim for stretching out the phenomena of the nature, exploring the law of the society and advancing the development of the humanity. Madam Curie, a brilliant chemist who firstly found the Radium, is a typical example. Her primary invention of the Radium did not serve for the nuclear weapon but just to find out more useful chemical substance and the principle of the chemical word. Can we convict that Madam Curie is guilty? Therefore, we can arbitrarily attribute these negative effects to scientists.
Even though the discoveries of scientists have indirectly negative effect on today social problems, there are far more advantages of their contribution. As is well known, nothing in the world is entirely perfect. We cannot entirely deprive the merit of the discovery for our society. Scientists’ explorations play a significant role in human beings development. For instance, Watt, an eminent science, devised the first steam engine which made a huge influence for the further automobile. Without the discovery of the steam engine, maybe today efficient cars will disappear in our world. History abounds with all kinds of the significant examples.
Who should be responsible for the horrible impact? If consider meticulously, we easily realize the radical reason of these negative problems. It is the people themselves who extremely abuse the scientist discovery.赞 Looking back the Watt’s steam engine, we can easily find that the air pollution is not due to the engine themselves but people’s abuse of the cars and neglect of the environmental protection. Another reason of the negative effect is that people unjustly and maliciously employ scientists’ exploration. like, Madam Curie’s Radium is just for researching the law of the world; nonetheless, today people entangle it into the produce of the nuclear weapon. When human beings blindly enjoy the attainment of scientist, isn’t it necessary that they should more consideration the negative impact will bring up? % {( y' O/ ?, D
In conclusion, scientists completely intent to the research of the nature and the improvement of the society and their discoveries make great contribution the development of the human beings. For the negative problem, It is not the scientists but the people themselves who should take this responsibility.
童鞋是不是考过G啊?句子流畅,逻辑啊结构啊什么的都很好,有细节也有例子。。。赞
|
|
|