【Big Fish】03月09日Argument161--By Bruce

cloudwind-greUID: 2462220

In the argument, by the comparison of their studies finished the University of Leeville,the auther simple get his concludsion that the the former survey about the reading habits of Leeville citizens was wrong.

The auther postulates that the latter survey must contridict the former one because the two results are incompatible. In fact, we have to take in to accunut about the time bewteen those two studies becuase the habits of Leeville citizens would change. It is possible that some new published mystery novels dramatically attracted the citizens' attention, thereby resulting in the transform of their penchants.

Also, the latter survey maybe incorrect becuase the result was based on the book borrowed by the citizens for public libraries, which maybe not the readers' most interesting place. There are perhaps many private libraries in the city, which attract most of the readers in Leeville city, hence in the error of the latter survey. In order obtain an more convincing result, the result of the second survey must include the number and frequency of reader who are more willing to private libraries in Leeville city.

We have to concede that going to the libraries is not the unique way for people to read. Obviously, reading at home or reading in the Internet are also their selections. It is not quite available for the researchers to calculate these latent figures. So the reader habits can not be totally revealed by a simple survey about the readers in libraries, and the auther could not use the result in the second survey to overturn the first one.

Nevertheless, even most of the readers go to public libraries to read books, it is still not quit appropriate for the researcher to say that the public perferred to mystery novel. The reason can be attributed the fact that only the book checked out is took in to account, neglecting the books being read inside the libraries.  We have to understand how many people are reading inside and what kinds of books are they reading inside. In consequence, the auther's conclusion is not cogent.

To sum up, the auther's conclusion that the former is misrepresented maybe incorrect becuase he overlooked many other aspects including the possible change of people's habits, the readers who are keen to read in proprietary libraries, the readers who read at home or in the Internet and the readers who enjoy their reading inside public libraries.

rokre2ttUID: 2714355

In the argument, by the comparison of their studies finished the University of Leeville,the auther simple（simply） get(s) his concludsion that the the former survey about the reading habits of Leeville citizens was wrong.

The auther postulates that the latter survey must contridict the former one because the two results are incompatible. In fact, we have to take in to accunut about the time bewteen those two studies becuase the habits of Leeville citizens would change. It is possible that some new published mystery novels dramatically attracted the citizens' attention, thereby resulting in the transform of their penchants. （习惯的改变不是突然地，建议换一种假设）

Also, the latter survey maybe incorrect becuase the result was based on the book borrowed by the citizens for public libraries, which maybe not the readers' most interesting place. There are perhaps many private libraries in the city, which attract most of the readers in Leeville city, hence in the error of the latter survey.（为什么会增大后面调查的错误性？后面的调查并没有强调说公共图书馆的悬疑小说是被喜欢文学经典的人借走的啊。） In order obtain an more convincing result, the result of the second survey must include the number and frequency of reader who are more willing to private libraries in Leeville city.

We have to concede that going to the libraries is not the unique way for people to read. Obviously, reading at home or reading in the Internet are also their selections. It is not quite available for the researchers to calculate these latent figures. So the reader habits can not be totally revealed by a simple survey about the readers in libraries, and the auther could not use the result in the second survey to overturn the first one.

Nevertheless, even most of the readers go to public libraries to read books, it is still not quit appropriate for the researcher to say that the public perferred to mystery novel. The reason can be attributed the fact that only the book checked out is took in to account, neglecting the books being read inside the libraries. （这个点新） We have to understand how many people are reading inside and what kinds of books are they reading inside. In consequence, the auther's conclusion is not cogent.

To sum up, the auther's conclusion that the former is misrepresented maybe incorrect becuase he overlooked many other aspects including the possible change of people's habits（during the interim）, the readers who are keen to read in proprietary libraries, the readers who read at home or in the Internet and the readers who enjoy their reading inside public libraries.
跟Issue一样，请先用world 检查下哈