[Big Fish]3月11日Argument165 by-bobbiezz

BobbieZZUID: 2756583

TOPIC: ARGUMENT165 - The following appeared in a business magazine.

"As a result of numerous consumer complaints of dizziness and nausea, Promofoods requested that eight million cans of tuna be returned for testing last year. Promofoods concluded that the cans did not, after all, contain chemicals that posed a health risk. This conclusion is based on the fact that the chemists from Promofoods tested samples of the recalled cans and found that, of the eight chemicals most commonly blamed for causing symptoms of dizziness and nausea, five were not found in any of the tested cans. The chemists did find that the three remaining suspected chemicals are naturally found in all other kinds of canned foods."
=============================================================================

The statement asserts the cans of tuna made by Promofood Company caused large amounts of consumers such illness as dizziness and nausea. This opinion cannot stand as the author states, although he points out several evidences to explain the food emergency event. These researches the speaker used to support his views have vague data, incomplete compared and other logical mistakes such as follow respects.

First of all, the samples that Promofoods selected have no sufficient evidences to point out its tuna cans were coincided with quality of food standards. The eight millions cans that have be said have problem, whereas the samples they choose to test have not enough and the number of it was not be said from start to end. Perhaps the test program is not strict to test the quality of cans. Or perhaps the quality of tests cans have according to the standards, but others have not. Without other companies to monitor the progress, it may have more mistakes during it. So the speaker should give more details about the food quality test program of the Promofoods Company, or it cannot subsidize the point of his views.

Secondly, even if the samples of Promofood choose have no problem to doubt, it cannot be proved that the last year's food test is suitable to the commodity of nowadays. The company only provides the quality test of last year's. The tuna cans may have well quality of last year, it may have some mistakes in nearly months due to increasing the number of cans they may ignore the food's quality. Perhaps the standards of food test are lower than last year so that make this eight millions tuna cans cause illness of people. So the speaker should provide this years food test evidences to subsidize the quality of Promofoods' whether have mistake in making cans or not.

Thirdly, even if their cans have spot in making in plants, it could not be proof that consumers illness is caused by this cans. Feeling dizziness and nausea may have another reasons such as the serious and widely flu in society. For instance, the most serious flu H1N1 has injure a large amounts of people, making them have the symptom like dizziness and nausea, so the reasons why public have this illness should have the doctors and hospital's evidences to explain whether the illness was due to this tuna cans. So the author should have more details to support his points that the cans caused the illness like public assert.

To sum up, the samples of cans Promofood tested should have more details to explain and this eight millions mistake cans that should have their own quality test report, but use last years. The reasons why people feel dizziness and nausea have no evidences that proofed by hospital, it cannot be assert the tuna cans have influence the illness. Before the author make decision, he should consider into more details and have strict logical, it would more convinced.

cloudwind-greUID: 2462220

1# BobbieZZ

The statement asserts the cans of tuna made by Promofood Company caused large amounts of consumers such illness as dizziness and nausea. 是没有造成,不是造成头晕了.This opinion cannot stand as the author states, although he points out several evidences to explain the food emergency event. These researches the speaker used to support his views have vague data, incomplete compared and other logical mistakes such as follow respects.

First of all, the samples that Promofoods selected have no sufficient evidences to point out its tuna cans were coincided with quality of food standards. The eight millions cans that have be said have problem, whereas the samples they choose to test have not enough and the number of it was not be said from start to end. Perhaps the test program is not strict to test the quality of cans. Or perhaps the quality of tests cans have according to the standards, but others have not. Without other companies to monitor the progress, it may have more mistakes during it. So the speaker should give more details about the food quality test program of the Promofoods Company, or it cannot subsidize the point of his views.

Secondly, even if the samples of Promofood choose have no problem to doubt, it cannot be proved that the last year's food test is suitable to the commodity of nowadays. The company only provides the quality test of last year's. The tuna cans may have well quality of last year, it may have some mistakes in nearly months due to increasing the number of cans they may ignore the food's quality. Perhaps the standards of food test are lower than last year so that make this eight millions tuna cans cause illness of people. So the speaker should provide this years food test evidences to subsidize the quality of Promofoods' whether have mistake in making cans or not.

Thirdly, even if their cans have spot in making in plants, it could not be proof that consumers illness is caused by this cans. Feeling dizziness and nausea may have another reasons such as the serious and widely flu in society. For instance, the most serious flu H1N1 has injure a large amounts of people, making them have the symptom like dizziness and nausea, so the reasons why public have this illness should have the doctors and hospital's evidences to explain whether the illness was due to this tuna cans. So the author should have more details to support his points that the cans caused the illness like public assert.

To sum up, the samples of cans Promofood tested should have more details to explain and this eight millions mistake cans that should have their own quality test report, but use last years. The reasons why people feel dizziness and nausea have no evidences that proofed by hospital, it cannot be assert the tuna cans have influence the illness. Before the author make decision, he should consider into more details and have strict logical, it would more convinced.



Argumenet 的结论是Promofoods 的产品没有有毒物,不会导致头晕等. 我们的任务是去doubt 它.楼主你的文章是去维护他的.相反了.