ningzhithm的作文本

ningzhithmUID: 2680175

It's better to watch serious movies to get deeper think than watch movies that amuse or entertain you.

I generally agree with the assertion that serious movies are better to watch than amusing or entertaining ones.
In my opinion, any movie should have some deeper things buried in it, which could tell the watchers somethings. It should have a theme, and the core of the movie should reprent that theme, while the means of reprentation could be diverse. The themes could be love , or  braveness and courge, loyalty, patroism, but entertainment. Comics entertain people, they try to less the burden and set our soul free, this kind of movie has always been very popular. Yes, who want to go to the cinema, and cry or peep all the way back home. People go to the cinema to enjoy themselves. Today's movies, no matter what their kind, have some content of entertainment. Love stories present us with brilliant men and women, whose beauty catch a lot of eyeballs. The action movies present with fantastic pictures of combustion and fighting, which are really thrilling. Narrative stories seem more serious, but they are usually unbelivalbly touching. We are moved into tears and think the movie of be thoughtful.
But it is natural for movies to be thrilling, goodlooking, fantanstiv to catch the eyeballs, for only in this way could the movies be sold out. However I strongly aovid the movies with entertainment as their own theme. During the movie, we laugh, and as soon as the movie is over, we forget everything about it. Comics like "the onions" are acceptble, for the social problems involved in it. Though it has gone to far to pleasing pepople and the contents are somewhat disgusting, it talks about the dark side our society which has been neglected for most of the time.
So the theme of the movie should serious, while there could be diverse presenting methods. I don't like the dark and dull movies. Watching them is suffering and a totally waste of time. There are many ways to learn knowledge and think critically but not through watching movies which should be an entertainment. Provided with plenty of teaching videos and books of all fields, we have enough sourses for deep thinking. Besides the life itself is a colorful lesson which is much more exciting than any movie, everyone needs to consider and cogitate to live better. So forget about movies of deep thought,just enjoy it and make your life colorful.

第一次写toefl作文，感觉时间过得好快啊  写出来的东西也很悲惨 请指教

ningzhithmUID: 2680175

Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? People should be allowed to use mobile phone in public transportation (plane, train, bus)?
1,空间是大家共有的 就像公共场所能不能吸烟一样  要区分利弊 在这里 利大于弊
2，移动电话是人语言功能的延伸 如果禁止用手机 就像不准说话一样 只有在完全需要安静的地方才 要禁止 如果某人太吵应当 个别情况的阻止
3，涉及到安全 就要禁止 比如 飞机 比如 驾驶员 比如驾驶员旁边 等等

I agree with the statment. In my opinion, people should be allowed to use mobile phones in public transportation except a few situations which may cause  dander.
First, in public transportion. The space in the vehice is owned and shared by all the passengers. So a passenger has the right to make sounds in the space, speaking, laughing, crying, singing are possible acceptable behaviors, and so should phone calls be accepted. There have long detabes overing smoking in the public. The smokers have the right to smoke, and for some of them, smoking is an urgent desire that can not be simply depressed. But smoking has been connected with lung cancer and other respiratory diseases, so smoking in the public could be a possible danger to others. The nonsmokers also have the ownership of the air of public place, so they strongly argue aginst smoking. There is an argument because the connection with health damage and smoking is not clear, when doctors reveals the sure connection, most of the public place abandon smoking, and considering the rights of smokers, they are provided with specific places to solve their needs. In public vehicles, we see smoking place.
However, using mobile phone is another kind of situation. In this process, people just make some noises. The side effects it cause  depend on the context and loudness. We can not ban peole from speaking in the public transportation, so it is not concious for us to abandon phone calls. It is not reasonable to shut down people's mouth just because he or she is not taking with people nearby.  So, in most of situations mobile phones should not be banned, it is just an important part of the civil privacy.
However, in some specific situations,  mobile phones should be banned. I conclude these situations into two kinds. The first is using mobile phones is endangering the transportation or other people's life. The second is using mobile phone greatly impinge others' rights, and cause malaise. The first kind of situations should include phonecalls on the plain which may affects the elecotronical waves the plain should normaly receive.  And loud and noisy talking which greatly distracts the driver and affects his or her driving technique. In the public, when we come across some talktive person who talks loudly and untiringly all the time, we may feel very unpleased. When people around can not tolerate him or her anymore, we have two choices, the first is to leave and the second is to shut him up. In the public transportion, we could do similar things. We could go to deck to aovid the noise down or sit in differnt apartment of the train or just let him or her low down the voice or shut him or her down. The process is unformal and personnal, which should not be legislated. Moblie phones benefit a lot, they are a powerful tool of communication especially the mordern phones like iphone. Most importantly people still have rights to speak, so they have rights to make phone calls. Mobile phones should not be banned.

nexthopUID: 2744929

I generally agree with the assertion that serious movies are better to watch than amusing or entertaining ones. 感觉第一段是不是太直接了？

In my opinion, any movie should have some deeper things buried in it, which could tell the watchers somethings(something). It should have a theme, and the core of the movie should represent that theme, while the means of representation could be diverse. The themes could be love, or braveness and courage, loyalty, patriotism, but entertainment. Comics entertain people, they try to less the burden and set our soul free, and this kind of movie has always been very popular. Yes, who want to go to the cinema, and cry or peep all the way back home? People go to the cinema to enjoy themselves. Today's movies, no matter what their kind, have some content of entertainment. Love stories present us with brilliant men and women, whose beauty catch a lot of eyeballs. The action movies present with fantastic pictures of combustion and fighting, which are really thrilling. Narrative stories seem more serious, but they are usually unbelievably touching. We are moved into tears and think the movie of be thoughtful.


But it is natural for movies to be thrilling, goodlooking(good-looking), fantastic to catch the eyeballs, for only in this way could the movies be sold out. However I strongly avoid the movies with entertainment as their own theme. During the movie, we laugh, and as soon as the movie is over, we forget everything about it. Comics like "the onions" are acceptable, for the social problems involved in it. Though it has gone to far to pleasing people and the contents are somewhat disgusting, it talks about the dark side our society which has been neglected for most of the time.

So the theme of the movie should serious, while there could be diverse presenting methods. I don't like the dark and dull movies. Watching them is suffering and a totally waste of time. There are many ways to learn knowledge and think critically but not through watching movies which should be an entertainment. Provided with plenty of teaching videos and books of all fields, we have enough sources for deep thinking. Besides the life itself is a colorful lesson which is much more exciting than any movie, everyone needs to consider and cogitate to live better. So forget about movies of deep thought, just enjoy it and make your life colorful.


1. 拼写有比较多的错误，建议写完以后贴到word里，平时就可以注意哪些词经常拼错。
2. 我个人觉得吧，托福作文还是挺讲究结构的，比如你第二段的内容论述的有点点乱，两个方面都在讲，而且论述内容和主题句结合不够紧密。
3. 通篇都是在将道理，老外看文章喜欢看例子的，所以最好是能用具体的例子来例证你的观点，不然显得很空洞。
第一篇已经写的很好了，继续加油~~

ningzhithmUID: 2680175

我是用了吸烟来作为例子说明 公共场所 的个人 权利问题 我的逻辑是既然吸烟这种行为都没有被禁止，那么打电话就更加不会被禁止了
第一段的意思是说 既然人们在公共场所 有通话的权利，所以我们要保障它。但是也不是没有限度地保障它，因为在有些特定情况下，通话是对绝大数人有危害的。
你说没有逻辑的那句话 是这样的， 在公共场所 我们不可能去限制人们说话的分贝数，不能因为人们说话声音大就让别人闭嘴。 这同样适用于打电话。

额，我很迥。这是我第二次写托福作文，把它写得面目全非了。
4# jbc88

ningzhithmUID: 2680175

Do you agree or disagree that scientists should be responsible for the negative impacts of their discoveries?

I generally believe that scientists should not be responsible for the negative impacts of their discoveries. Scientists' task is to explore the new things. The impact their discoveries bring about, no matter negative or positive, should be handled by the whole society and the scientists themselves. The society should set rules to regulate the new technology but not the scientists themselves. Besides, side effects are often controllable. On the other side, scientists should base their research on a good and promising motive which does not deviate from common moral standards.
Scientists are those who promote the pacement of society with progressing science and technology. If they are discourged for the shortcomings of their discoveries, there will be less progress. Scientists will hesitate in thinking and exploring new ideas and ereas, beacuse they don't know what the result will be and what the new discovery will bring about. When Einstein found out the relative theory, he did not realise the great impact it brings to the framwork of theory of physiology, not to mention the atom bombs. Are we going to blame Einstein's theory of relativism for the invention of atom bombs which has tremendous destrutive power? We are not. Atom bombs appear just becasuse people had not apply the theory in the right way. The government should take the responsiblity. So, I strongly recommend that the government modulate the appliance of new technologies and let new discovies bring merits instead of disasters. The governments themselves should be controlled, the latest theories are applied in military fields, and the incoming inventions are to serve the military instead of the citizens. So, we can see, the govenment itself should take responsibility of the negative impacts of new discoveries, because they explore and create them.
Another reason why scientists should not take the responsiblity is that the negative impacts can be controlled most of the time. Just as a double-edged sword, everything has its postive and negative sides. That's to say, no discovery is of no use at all. What we should do is to explore the postive effects and limitat its side effects. When some product or invention has some defects, modulations should be made to perfect it. 606 is a powerful pesticide, marked by strong toxity to insects like mosquitoes and flies and low toxity to human beings. The inventor of 606 was awarded with the Nobel Prize of Chemistry. However, as time passes by, 606 is proved to accumulate in bodies of predators, and a greatly elevelatd content is bad for the hosts’ reproductive system. 606 was limited and is rarely used today. More powerful subsitutes has been invented.   
However, scientists need not take the responsibility of their discovery dose not mean they could research anything they like. There are some fields which have caused great anxiety and may bring about severe outcomings like the cloning of human beings and the production of weapons of mass destruction. These fields definitly should be banned from reseraching. That is to say, if a scientist know his research will bring disaters, he or she should not go on that research.
To conclude, scientist should not take the responsibility of their research, they should focus on the research itself. The government instead should set rules about the fields of applicaiton. Moreover, mangement of scientists should exsit to ban them from the obvious adverse areas.

caoxuemeiUID: 2629828

4,3号

nexthopUID: 2744929

4.4 ningzhithm  by Nexthop

ningzhithmUID: 2680175

4.3日作文 修改后
Some movies are serious, designed to make the audience think. Other movies are designed primarily to amuse and entertain. Which type of movie do you prefer? Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
Some people prefer serious movies, and some people prefer amusing or entertaining movies. As far as I am concerned, I’d like to choose serious movies. For they provide valuable knowledge, induce deep thinking and give viewers a better understanding of life, scocity and themselves.
Serious movies provid valuable knowledge. Unlike entertaining or amusing movies, they are made to teach people something. Their themes involve art, philosphy, history, biology, history, geography, geology, medicine, and many others. The DISCOVERY series are a great representive. The discovery series embrace us with the amazing world by introducing us to a great number of themes. From the viedos, I learn the basic structure of the human body and the working mecanics of our body, the growing up process of human from an egg to a baby, the plentiful animals and plants in rain forests of the Amazon area, the destructive power of earthquakes and volcano eruption. Actually the movies have trigerred my love of life and nature, for they show me a world full of mirals, mysteries, and vast beauty.
Serious movies induce deep and thorough thinking of our life. Stories of great people or history events often set us good examples, encourage us to do something great, and most importantly let us think about the meaning and value of life. The movie Forrest Gump is a excellent movie. It depicts the life history of Forrest Gump from a mentally and physically disabled young boy to a world champion of pingpong and a hero in the Vietnam war. Each time I watch it, I am moved into tears not only for Gump’s hard road towards success, but also for his standards towards love, money, and friendship. Even after his lover has indulged herself for so long, he still loves her and embraces her despite her former abandonment. From this, I set myself standards of love: purity and responsibility. Gump makes a great lot of money by catching fish, but he has a simple life as he has always had. The amount of money is just a number, it should be the aim of a life’s concern and ambition.
On the other hand, I don’t avoid entertaining movies. Mr Bean is one of my favorite characters. Watching his movie is a great pleaure especially when I am heavily burdened or in great depression. I believe many other people are impressed by his exagerrated behavior and funny facial expressions just as I am.
In a word, serious movies are my favorites for they provides me with plenty knowledge and deep thought while entertaining movies are also accepted for the pleasure they can provide.

ningzhithmUID: 2680175

4.4 日 作文 改后
My point is that scientists should not be responsible for the negative impacts of their discoveries. The impact scientists’ discoveries bring about, no matter negative or positive, should be handled by the whole society instead of the scientists themselves. It is the society’s role to set regulations of alppication. Once side effects have occurred, remedies should be done and  improvement should be made. However scientists should also be under control, they should base their research on a virtuous and promising motive which does not deviate from common moral standards.

It is one thing for scientists to make discoveries and another thing for the discoveries to be explored and applied to manufacture. It is the government’s responsibility to promote discovery and restrict the exploration and application. Rules should be set and eval-intended trials should be inhibited. When Einstein developed the relative theory, he did not realize the great impact it would bring to the framework of theory of physiology, not to mention its outcome: the atom bombs. Are we going to blame the theory of relativism for atom bomb which is not Einstein’s real intention but has caused tremendous destruction? We are not. Atom bomb appears for the government’s poor control on weapon contruction. The American government should take the responsibility of the disasters in Japan. Scientists’ task is to develope science and techonology. Taking responsibility of the side effects is not their primary task.
Nothing is one hundred percent good, shortcomings or flaws are always present. What we should do is to explore the positive effects and limit negative effects. When defects have been found, we should try possible way of modulations and improvements instead of demanding scientist asocciated to take responsibility. 606 is a powerful pesticide, marked by strong toxity to insects like mosquitoes and flies and low toxity to human beings. The inventor of 606 was awarded with the Nobel Prize of Chemistry. However, as time passes by, 606 is proved to accumulate in bodies of predators, and a greatly elevated concentration is bad for the hosts’ reproductive system. After the side effects have been discovered, 606 is limited and is rarely used today. More powerful substitutes have been invented.

However, scientists need to be under certain control, that means they could not research anything they like. There are some fields which have caused great anxiety and may bring about disasters like cloning of human beings and the production of weapons of mass destruction. These fields definitely should be banned. That demands a high moral standards of scientists, they should not do research that will denefitly harms the world.

To sum up, scientist should not be responsibe for the side effects of their research, they should focus on the research itself. The government should set rules about the fields of application to control the side effects. Moreover, management of scientists should exist to ban them from the obvious adverse areas.

wyacUID: 2633619

4.4 ningzhithm-by YC.doc (27 KB, 下载次数: 4)

2010-4-5 14:00:22 上传

下载次数: 4

ningzhithmUID: 2680175

There are so many classes in college, how to choose appropriate classes? There are disputes between classes easy to get top grades and classes are very difficult. My point of view is, no matter what grade we get for a class, college students should choose the classes are essential to their own profession and also classes which they are most interested in while the most difficult classes should be avoided unless they are of great importance to the profession.

Students play it safe by choosing classes where they can get top grades. Some students first choose a class, during the term, if the class is found to be too difficult to get a top grade, the students will quit the class to avoid a B or C in their grade reports. They do this for a reason. Application to law schools and medical schools require very high score, if a student gets a "C" for a certain class, his or her hope of a successful application is very tiny. Their ambition requires them to play it safe by choosing the classes that they can get top grades to prove that they are top students. In my opinion, this kind of behavior is a cheat in some sense. The students cheat themselves by denying their needs towards other subjects like for example music, art, philosophy which they are interested at but not adept in. The sacrifice of their needs is a cruel lie to themselves. To the law schools and medical schools, they intend to accept the students who fit the profession best. I think a good candidate need to be well and thoroughly developed; he or she should have real capabilities. Those students who intentionally avoid classes of certain areas cheat the schools by showing partially their talents.

Unlike students of great caution, some students would like to choose the most difficult classes. They care more of what they get much more than the grades of the class. That is a very good thing if the students could adapt to the difficult classes and learn all the classes well. Indeed there is nothing to blame on a brilliant and hardworking student. However, college classes, unlike the courses in high school, are of great depth and difficulty. It is very difficult to master a class well in a very short time as many professors have been dedicated to certain branches of the class all their life. So it is both unrealistic and unwise for students to choose the most difficult classes.

But how should we choose classes? As far as I am concerned, on one side, students should choose classes according to both their interests and abilities. Students who want to have a happy and rich college life should choose several classes that interest them. For example, if we could choose primary music classes to get more knowledge about music, we will be a music lover of esthetic ears instead of a musician. On the other side, students need to be outstanding in their own profession, the most difficult classes are essential to choose. And students need to work really hard on them.

To conclude, students should not only choose some classes to develop hobbies but also get perfect in their own profession by choosing the most difficult classes. Besides students should not play it safe by only choosing his or her specialism to make their grade report appealing, they should develop their ability by taking classes of diverse areas.

nexthopUID: 2744929

4.5 ningzhithm by nexthop

ningzhithmUID: 2680175

According to my understanding of people, I do not agree with the statement that most people prefer having other people make decisions for them rather than making decisions by themselves. There are two main characters of most human beings associated to the statement: dependence and self-center. On one side, many people are dependent on other people, especially when are faced with dilemmas. It is natural for them to turn to other people for their opinions and decisions as reference. On the other side, because a considerable in number of people are self centered, they make their own decisions based on their needs. Having other people make decisions is great example of dependence and self-center.

Not everyone is as decisive as CEOs or political leaders, many people are often faced with problems beyond their power that cause anxiety and hesitation. In that situation, the people dilemma often turn to other people, who may understand the conditions better or have ability to help solve the problem or can offer encouragement and comfort. By getting more people involved in their problems, people may greater possibility to go out of hesitation and solve the problem. High school students often turn to teachers; college students often turn to deans; the young may turn to the old; husband and wife turn to each other. To get some people to help them is a very often used tactic to solve their own problems, it shows that most people would depend on help from outside world rather than make full use of their intelligence and ability.

Turning to others for decisions also demonstrates that people are self-centered or in other words selfish. It is very difficult for people to place others' interest before their own, an element of selfishness can be found in nearly everyone. Selfishness means the decisions we make are always based on our own needs. People hesitate when they are to make important decisions, which decide their life, health, career and achievements, because they matter so much that a wrong one would mean a great loss. So, many people will turn to experts and the experienced for help them have a clear vision of the current condition and possible outcome in the future and decide what should do. In the hospital, doctors provide patients knowledge about their disease and also the prognosis of their specific situation. Patients need to decide for themselves major medical procedures according to their own preference and informed knowledge of their body condition. Doctors only inform patients with current situation and possible procedures and the patients themselves consent to a preferred procedure. This is called an informed-consent. In the case, we see patients by no means deny making decisions by themselves; they use rights of dealing with their own body. From the example in hospital, we see people turn for help and decide for themselves.

To conclude, though most people have other people make decisions for them, they are just gathering more help to solve the problem by making their decision which best fits to their needs.

happyfaith2008UID: 2709856

改完了，见谅~~