41."Such non-mainstream areas of inquiry as astrology, fortune-telling, and psychic and paranormal pursuits play a vital role in society by satisfying human needs that are not addressed by mainstream science."
Position: The author’s conclusion that non-mainstream areas of inquiry as mentioned are of great significance for they meet human needs is a little oversimplified.
(1) Admittedly that astrology, fortune-telling, and psychic and paranormal pursuits remain to be prevalent from ancient times to the present
indicates they indeed fulfill the need of human, at least in the special aspects.
Instance in proof:
A. “divine kingship” to consolidate the governance-- psychic and paranormal pursuits B. investigation in surprising amount-- fortune-telling C. way of escapism when problems cannot be settled
(2)However, the judge that a trend of thought has an influence hinges on initially wide acceptance and mainstream of human living, according to which we cannot result that such non-mainstream areas of inquiry play a vital role.
Instance in proof: A. necessity of information and analytical method in analysis B. uncertainty
(3) In conclusion, when the pursuit of sense of security in existence and psychology cannot be satisfied, we are inclined to turn to irrational thinking. Therefore they may be detrimental leading to unreasonable course of action.
61."High-profile awards such as the Nobel Prize are actually damaging to society because they suggest that only a few people deserve such recognition."
Position: The conclusion is too radical.
(1)Awards like that can encourage and approve outstanding persons as well as urge the lagger to catch up.
Instance in proof: Scholarship, honor
(2)However we cannot get the deduction that high-profile awards are damaging to society for they may promote the competition which will hence push ahead development of society. Furthermore, those who don’t get the prize are also excellent, deserving the acknowledgement too.
Instance in proof:侯氏制碱法
(3)All in all, the establishment of high-profile awards is to encourage people to strive for the pursuit of continuous transcendence which should be advocated.
76."Truly profound thinkers and highly creative artists are always out of step with their time and their society."
Position: Truly profound thinkers and highly creative artists can hardly be accepted by their time and society. The author’s conclusion is too radical.
(1)Truly profound thinkers and highly creative artists hold more acute and sharp eyesight and higher wisdom so that they seem to be different from the time and society they live in.
(2)Even though, their sights and ideas are based on the nature of human beings which seems to be sophisticated in the view of common mass population.
Actually the productions of the thinkers and creative artists are in tight relation with themes of nowadays society.
(3)
It is unreasonable to affirm that ... Some profound and creative works of the thinkers and artists credit to the professional ability. They are pioneers of the society.
185."Scandals—whether in politics, academia, or other areas—can be useful. They focus our attention on problems in ways that no speaker or reformer ever could."