10.07--Roc9999 的作文 求狠批！

roc9999UID: 2610840

Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? To remain happy and optimistic when you fail is more important than achieving success


It is said that “Failure is the mother of success”. Exactly, no one can avoid failures. Keep in mind that, the more important thing is not to pursue another success blindly, but rather to hold a correct attitude to face failures. Thus,we should remain happy and optimistic when we fail. This positive attitude helps us bridge success. I will set out my ideas in the following paragraphs using clear examples and concise logic.


When we fail, the most emergency thing is to find the reasons accounting for our failure. And remaining happy and optimistic is able to make we keep a clear mind, avoiding blind and progressive decisions for achieving success. For example, when my uncle was at 25, he established a company of electrical products. However, one year later, he failed and went bankrupt. At that time he was young and energetic. Motivated by great shame of failure, he put forward a new proposal for achieving success without serious consideration. But, his girlfriend stopped him. She recommended that he should hold a positive attitude, remaining happy and optimistic, and waited for the next chance. My uncle followed her suggestion. Finally my uncle realized that he was not suitable for business and changed to other vocation. My uncle told me that owing to the advice of his girlfriend, he kept a positive view when facing with failure, which prevented him from unreasonable pursue of success.


Besides its assistance to calming down us, to remain happy and optimistic when we fail also benefits our health. Many diseases mainly result from impacts of negative emotions produced by failure. My college tutor got his life-long stomach disease after a big failure in stock. Two thirds of his saving was gone due to a wrong investment. At that period, both his body and spirit were hugely destroyed by the big loss. For two weeks, he hardly managed to take any food, which finally leads to the great harm on his stomach. He told me that if he could remain a positive and optimistic attitude when in failure, he would not suffer from the painful stomach disease in the following days. Thus, we should realize that health is always more important than success. We should not sacrifice our health to achieve success.


In summary, I am definitely supportive to the point that we should remain happy and optimistic when we fail. The positive attitude does us a great favor not only in protecting us from impractical decisions for achieving success but also in helping us keeping healthy.

roc9999UID: 2610840

10.09 作文 求批死 ！

Is it acceptable for teachers to give their social or political views in the classroom? In my view, any teacher should not inject their personal political or social points into the courses. The class is a platform to impart knowledge from generation to generation, not a place to present personal views of society and politics. In the classroom, this action itself has transcended the proper duties of teachers. I will set out my ideas in the following paragraphs using clear ideas and concise logic.

First, we must fully understand that every student has the right to freely choose his/her view of society and politics. The word “fully” means that his/her judgment should not be influenced by any other external force. It must be from his/her independent thinking. If teachers often show their attitudes in the classroom, such behaviors force students to accept views without their permission: few students dare to express their antipathy.

In addition, such behavior is sort of a way to erode students’ ability of independent thinking. One of the most important missions of university is to educate students an independent thinker. But if teachers often state their social or political views in the classroom, students will become used to getting ideas from teachers not themselves, consequently gradually losing capacity of independent thinking. Second, teachers’ actions, implying personal social and political points in the classroom, may result in the division of students. It is not hard to explain that students of right wind would like to attend courses taught by teachers of right wind. So do students of left wind. If the teachers continue to show their points in the classroom, the class would to some extent become a “battle”. Students of different views attend different courses respectively, consequently forming groups of different views. It is of great possibility to have conflicts between groups of different points. I think no educators welcome such divisions and conflicts. Thus, teachers must constrain their performances in the classroom and do best efforts to construct a tolerable and pure academic environment for students.

In summary, I strongly oppose the statement that teachers are allowed to give social and political points in the classroom. This intrudes rights of independent thinking of students. Besides, it will exert negative influence in university culture, which plants seeds of potential conflicts. Therefore, teachers should be absolutely forbidden to give any sort of social or political points in the classroom.

jcf2008UID: 2681015

Is it acceptable for teachers to give their social or political views in the classroom? In my view, any teacher should not inject their personal political or social points into the courses. The class is a platform to impart knowledge from generation to generation, not a place to present personal views of society and politics. In the classroom, this action itself has transcended the proper duties of teachers. I will set out my ideas in the following paragraphs using clear ideas and concise logic.9

First, we must fully understand that every student has the right to freely choose his/her view of society and politics. The word “fully” means that his/her judgment should not be influenced by any other external force. It must be from his/her independent thinking. If teachers often show their attitudes in the classroom, such behaviors force students to accept views without their permission: few students dare to express their antipathy. (读着很顺畅，很舒服~)
b
In addition, such behavior is sort of a way to erode students’ ability of independent thinking. One of the most important missions of university（题上没说是大学哦~） is to educate students an independent thinker. But if teachers often state their social or political views in the classroom, students will become used to getting ideas from teachers not themselves, consequently gradually losing capacity of independent thinking. Second, teachers’ actions, implying personal social and political points in the classroom, may result in the division of students. It is not hard to explain that students of right wind （原来右翼是right wind 啊~长见识了~）would like to attend courses taught by teachers of right wind. So do students of left wind. If the teachers continue to show their points in the classroom, the class would to some extent become a “battle”. Students of different views attend different courses respectively, consequently（换换词？） forming groups of different views. It is of great possibility to have conflicts between groups of different points. I think no educators welcome such divisions and conflicts. Thus, teachers must constrain their performances in the classroom and do best efforts to construct a tolerable and pure academic environment for students.
O
In summary, I strongly oppose the statement that teachers are allowed to give social and political points in the classroom. This intrudes rights of independent thinking of students. Besides, it will exert negative influence in university culture, which plants seeds of potential conflicts. （好句子~）Therefore, teachers should be absolutely forbidden to give any sort of social or political points in the classroom.

写得真的很好~好词好句连连。还有第二段貌似Word 顺序混乱了~“Second，……”应该在前面吧~ 希望LZ再接再厉，考试加油咯~^_^

roc9999UID: 2610840

3# jcf2008
不好意思，右翼是right wing，最后一个打错了！

roc9999UID: 2610840

In China, the history of books could date back to 4,000 years ago. At first books were made from hides, then the bamboo. About 1,000 years ago, the printed book made of paper first appeared, consequently culminating in a great impact on Chinese society. Now, due to the technology development, the printed books were more and more challenged by the electrical books. As to whether students will not use printed books, I am of the opinion that printed books are of permanent importance for us.

First, compared with electrical books, the printed book has its own advantage of easier approach. We don’t need any external power to run them. In contrast, electrical books cannot be accessible without the power. In my view, this drawback poses a great obstacle to electrical books’ ambition for completely replacing printed books. For instance, once I made a long travel to Tibet, bringing a PDA which supports electrical books. But after only 4 hours reading, the battery was used up while my journey was lasting for 20 hours on the train. In the following time, I had to bear the damn boring. I got a big lesson from that travel. After then, whichever travel, short or long distance, I would bring printed books rather than electrical books with myself.

Second, out of the consideration for collection, students will not abandon printed books. I know that many students have great interest in books collection. We students are willing to put valuable books on the bookshelf other than in the computer, ensuring that we could review and refer to them at any time. For example, my major is Physics. Thus, my bookshelf is teemed with printed books related to the classic mechanism, quantum mechanism, the relativity, and the Physics experiment. Whenever I come across a question, I would refer to relevant books on my bookshelf. Undoubtedly, these printed books benefit me a lot in courses study.

However, though printed books still hold an important status in students’ life, we cannot deny that the electrical book plays a more and more vital role in our life. Many students give preference to electrical book in terms of general reading since electrical book is cheaper and easy to share. These two contribute to its unrivaled strength. But, according to recently survey, the cost students allocate to printed books exactly never decline though there is an impact of electrical book. The answer may be that electrical book is just a supplementary to their reading, without prejudice to their purchase interest in printed books.

In summary, I concur with the point that students will keep using printed books in future. Electrical book has become a more and more important part of student life. But, it does not contribute to a challenging threat to printed books based on discussions above.