1月13日 101210NA

lovely_hippo123UID：3209964

1月13日 101210NA
Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? It is better to finish a project completely and then begin a new one than work on two or more projects at the same time.
When comes to the question that is it better to finish a project completely and then begin a new one than work on two or more projects at the same time. The opinions differ. Some may tend to consider that it would be better to do thing one by one in orderly, for we can throw our whole heart into the work, and finish it as soon as possible. Others, however, may suggest that it can be more efficient to finish works at the same time. As far as I am concerned, both suggestions are make sense to some extent.

On the one hand, finish job one by one is apparently more beneficial for people who may divert his or her attention easily, since the individual can concentrate his or her whole hard into the job, and try his or her best to finish one job in the time. And thus he or she can finish job better and as soon as possible. Also, if the people, who have only limited time exit to finish many works, deciding to do jobs one by one, then he or she will probably choose to finish the job according to their value or which is more important. So if the individual have not finish all jobs then the result can be acceptable.

On the other hand, since different jobs are also having some connection, people who do all the jobs at the same time may also benefit from their connection, in other word, when people confront with difficult and cannot make any proceed, at this time, if he or she try to do another job and it is quite possible that the people may achieve surprises. Also, doing one jobs all the time may be boring, at this time doing different job can not only the best way to make full use of time but also provide a relax means for people to enjoy.

Therefore, whether finish job one by one or do all jobs at the same time just rely on different situation and different people.

kikyou_lrUID：3228606

https://bbs.gter.net/thread-1324798-4-1.html
交晚了抱歉

kikyou_lrUID：3228606

力量有限，帮不上什么，让楼主失望了

lovely_hippo123UID：3209964

1月14日 101009NA
Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? People can take care of their family members better when they live in big cities than in the countryside.

1.大城市里找到一个不错的工作，工资比较高，让家人更好的生活。
2.这样当家人生病的时候，找到比较好的医院，而且可以接受比较好的治疗。
When comes to the questions that whether people can take care of their family members better when they live in big cities than in the countryside or not. Opinions differ; some tend to concern that people who live in countryside can live a life with less contamination which is better for their health and people are also have many friends then it will less necessarily for people to be take care of by the family members. Others, however, may suggest that city life would be prevalence as far as take care of people’s family concerned, since it seems more convenience for people’s daily life, and convenience is of most important for people to take care of their family. As far as I am concerned, I agree with the latter for following reasons.

First and foremost, people who live in a big city can have more opportunity to find a good job or have many methods to make money, since big cities are full of various sectors and almost every people can find their own way. Although money cannot be the only be the most important factor for who want to take care of their family, when people can even not make enough money to cover necessaries of his or her own live and have to be hungry, then how can him or she take care of his or her family? Especially when the people who is the only bread winner in his or her family, then make enough money to support his or her family is of great important. Money is the basic guarantee for people to take care of his or her family.

Furthermore, as universally know that it will be more convenient for people to live in a big city. if one of the members in our family suffers from severe disease, it will hard for people to find a good hospital or medical equipment of the hospital in the countryside may even not sophisticated enough to treat the people. Then only live in a big city can people have more opportunity to receive a better or suit treatment.

Last but not lease, as I just discuss above, since it would have more opportunity in a big city to find a job in a big city, young individuals in modern time are also tend to find a job in a big city, at this time, if the people still live in the countryside, it will take too much time for daily commuting which may result in fact that less time exit for the younger people to take care of people. It also be easy for good people to take care of their children when their children work at big cities since they can prepare three meals for their children and help then get rid of stressful daily housework.

Basing on above discussion, I feel safe to conclude that people can take care of their family members better when they live in big cities than in the countryside. Although people may live a healthier life since the better environment, as far as taking care of the family concerned people in modern time it would be better to live a big city.

lovely_hippo123UID：3209964

1月14日 101009NA
Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? People can take care of their family members better when they live in big cities than in the countryside.

1.大城市里找到一个不错的工作，工资比较高，让家人更好的生活。
2.这样当家人生病的时候，找到比较好的医院，而且可以接受比较好的治疗。
When comes to the questions that whether people can take care of their family members better when they live in big cities than in the countryside or not. Opinions differ; some tend to concern that people who live in countryside can live a life with less contamination which is better for their health and people are also have many friends then it will less necessarily for people to be take care of by the family members. Others, however, may suggest that city life would be prevalence as far as take care of people’s family concerned, since it seems more convenience for people’s daily life, and convenience is of most important for people to take care of their family. As far as I am concerned, I agree with the latter for following reasons.

First and foremost, people who live in a big city can have more opportunity to find a good job or have many methods to make money, since big cities are full of various sectors and almost every people can find their own way. Although money cannot be the only be the most important factor for who want to take care of their family, when people can even not make enough money to cover necessaries of his or her own live and have to be hungry, then how can him or she take care of his or her family? Especially when the people who is the only bread winner in his or her family, then make enough money to support his or her family is of great important. Money is the basic guarantee for people to take care of his or her family.

Furthermore, as universally know that it will be more convenient for people to live in a big city. if one of the members in our family suffers from severe disease, it will hard for people to find a good hospital or medical equipment of the hospital in the countryside may even not sophisticated enough to treat the people. Then only live in a big city can people have more opportunity to receive a better or suit treatment.

Last but not lease, as I just discuss above, since it would have more opportunity in a big city to find a job in a big city, young individuals in modern time are also tend to find a job in a big city, at this time, if the people still live in the countryside, it will take too much time for daily commuting which may result in fact that less time exit for the younger people to take care of people. It also be easy for good people to take care of their children when their children work at big cities since they can prepare three meals for their children and help then get rid of stressful daily housework.

Basing on above discussion, I feel safe to conclude that people can take care of their family members better when they live in big cities than in the countryside. Although people may live a healthier life since the better environment, as far as taking care of the family concerned people in modern time it would be better to live a big city.

lovely_hippo123UID：3209964

TPO13
The lecturer partly agree with the opinion in the passage that selling and buying fossil do some harm to the fossil, however the lecturer also figures out that the factors present in the passage are too exaggerate for certain reason.

First and foremost, actually public get more chance to get access to the fossil, since that in order to attract more purchaser, the commercial activity provide more exhibition to public, which contradict the factor raised in the passage that fossil being purchased rather than donated will lead public have little opportunity to admire fossil

Furthermore, the lecturer also content that scientist will not lose opportunity to do some important discoveries, for the fossil which being purchased by the people who is not a scientist will first send the fossil to the scientist or the fossil expert to indentify the value of the fossil.

Last but not least, although it may damage fossil in the process of the discovery, however, it is the collector who find such a large number of fossil, without the help of these collector then many fossil may being undiscovered forever and the public will completely suffers eventually.