寄托天下
查看: 973|回复: 1
打印 上一主题 下一主题

[a习作temp] Argument166 G-89-互助社 8.12作业 [复制链接]

Rank: 5Rank: 5

声望
0
寄托币
1532
注册时间
2005-4-29
精华
0
帖子
16
跳转到指定楼层
楼主
发表于 2005-8-13 20:50:44 |只看该作者 |倒序浏览
这两天有些懒哈,没写,大家拍拍砖,谢谢了
:lolArgument 166
The following appeared in a local newspaper.
'People should not be misled by the advertising competition between Coldex and Cold-Away, both popular over-the-counter cold medications that anyone can purchase without a doctor's prescription. Each brand is accusing the other of causing some well-known, unwanted side effect: Coldex is known to contribute to existing high blood pressure and Cold-Away is known to cause drowsiness. But the choice should be clear for most health-conscious people: Cold-Away has been on the market for much longer and is used by more hospitals than is Coldex. Clearly, Cold-Away is more effective.'



In the argument, the arguer concludes that Coldex is more effective. To substantiate this conclusion, the arguer first points that Cold-Away is known to contribute to existing high blood pressure and Cold-Away is known to cause drowsiness. In addition , the arguer reasons that Cold-Away has been on the market for much longer and is used by more hospitals than is Coldex. This argument suffers form several critical fallacies.

The fact that Coldex contributes to existing high blood pressure and that Cold-Away causes drowsiness conflicts with the arguer’s assumption that Cold-Away is generally more effective. For one thing, it is true that high-blood pressure may be harmful to health, however, if people with high-blood pressure take good care of their diets ,work and rest, it will make little influence on people’s health. By contrast, drowsiness influences people’s work and study. Sometimes drowsiness may even devitalize people’s life. For example, when one is driving, drowsiness may lead to traffic accidents. For another thing, even Coldex causes worse negative effects than Cold-Away does, this only shows that Cold-Away is safer than Coldex, however, does nothing with the effects.

Additionally, the fact that Cold-Away has been on the market for much longer and is used by more hospitals says little about its effects. First, Cold-Away in the market for much longer does not necessarily mean that it is more effective than Coldex. To the contrary, according to our common sense, a new medicine is always more effective than an old one. Second, there is no relationship between more user and better effects. There are many other reasons for people and hospitals to prefer Cold-Always other than effects, for instance the cheaper price. Meanwhile, there stands another possibility that more small hospitals use Cold-Away, while the big careful hospitals inclines to use Coldex. Finally, another reason for Coldex having less user is perhaps that it still needs more time to throw into the current market.

To conclude, the argument is not persuasive as it stands. Before we accept the conclusion, the arguer must convince than Cold-Away actually cause less effects than Codex. The most important thing is that the author should provide evidence to prove that Cold-Away is more effective than Coldex.
0 0

使用道具 举报

Rank: 3Rank: 3

声望
0
寄托币
261
注册时间
2005-3-27
精华
0
帖子
0
沙发
发表于 2005-8-13 23:40:42 |只看该作者
看到你给我改的作文了,谢谢,关于你说的每个body递进能再详细一些吗,怎么算是递进呢,不按文章顺序吗,我觉得时间比较紧,所以来不及想递进,看到一个错误就赶紧写了,呵呵


Argument166 G-89-互助社 8.12作业

这两天有些懒哈,没写,大家拍拍砖,谢谢了
Argument 166
The following appeared in a local newspaper.
'People should not be misled by the advertising competition between Coldex and Cold-Away, both popular over-the-counter cold medications that anyone can purchase without a doctor's prescription. Each brand is accusing the other of causing some well-known, unwanted side effect: Coldex is known to contribute to existing high blood pressure and Cold-Away is known to cause drowsiness. But the choice should be clear for most health-conscious people: Cold-Away has been on the market for much longer and is used by more hospitals than is Coldex. Clearly, Cold-Away is more effective.'


In the argument, the arguer concludes that Coldex is more effective. To substantiate this conclusion, the arguer first points that Cold-Away is known to contribute to existing high blood pressure and Cold-Away is known to cause drowsiness. In addition , the arguer reasons that Cold-Away has been on the market for much longer and is used by more hospitals than is Coldex. This argument suffers form several critical fallacies.开头太长了,可以更简单

The fact that Coldex contributes to existing high blood pressure and that Cold-Away causes drowsiness conflicts with the arguer’s assumption that Cold-Away is generally more effective. For one thing, it is true that high-blood pressure may be harmful to health, however, if people with high-blood pressure take good care of their diets ,work and rest, it will make little influence on people’s health. By contrast, drowsiness influences people’s work and study. Sometimes drowsiness may even devitalize people’s life. For example, when one is driving, drowsiness may lead to traffic accidents. For another thing, even Coldex causes worse negative effects than Cold-Away does, this only shows that Cold-Away is safer than Coldex, however, does nothing with the effects.论证不错,段末最好总结

Additionally, the fact that Cold-Away has been on the market for much longer and is used by more hospitals says little about its effects. First, Cold-Away in the market for much longer does not necessarily mean that it is more effective than Coldex. To the contrary, according to our common sense, a new medicine is always more effective than an old one. 这个没道理,新的就好???Second, there is no relationship between more user and better effects. There are many other reasons for people and hospitals to prefer Cold-Always other than effects, for instance the cheaper price. Meanwhile, there stands another possibility that more small hospitals use Cold-Away, while the big careful hospitals inclines to use Coldex. Finally, another reason for Coldex having less user is perhaps that it still needs more time to throw into the current market.论证不错,语言也可以

还可以找到其他错误啊,比如说即使CA有效不一定适用于所有患者,还有它们副作用的程度,不用医生处方可以开所以使用的人可能不再医院开药而自己去药店买

To conclude, the argument is not persuasive as it stands. Before we accept the conclusion, the arguer must convince than Cold-Away actually cause less effects than Codex. The most important thing is that the author should provide evidence to prove that Cold-Away is more effective than Coldex.

语言不错,就是找的错误少了点,一般三个吧
8.26北京鼎均,10.22天大,大家一起加油哦

使用道具 举报

RE: Argument166 G-89-互助社 8.12作业 [修改]

问答
Offer
投票
面经
最新
精华
转发
转发该帖子
Argument166 G-89-互助社 8.12作业
https://bbs.gter.net/thread-318215-1-1.html
复制链接
发送
回顶部