Issue3 (4而后生小组)的第三次作业 求拍！

insideUID: 2303230

这篇写得我完全没感觉哈，大家见笑了！！

ISSUE3
"It is more important to allocate money for immediate, existing social problems than to spend it on long-term research that might help future generations."

I fundamentally agree with the speaker that to allocate money for immediate, existing social problems is more important than to spend it on long-lerm research that might help future generations.

It is true that the government should pay for some long-term studies, which our future generations could benefit from. These studies should be focus on either some significant themes of our lives and societies, including environmental protection, space exploitation, resource saving and so on or some successive research in scientific fields like physics, chemistry, biology, astronomy and etc. Some of the problems which are not so serious today, may become too severe to survive from in the future. Therefore, it is too late for us to reach the moment that the situation could not be saved any more. For example, although the population can be contained by the earth, there might be some day that no more room for another person to stand on the ground, so we should try to establish a space station from now on. And also, some research in physics, chemistry and biology may seem to be useless right now, but perhaps they will play an important role in future development of medicine and survive a great numbers of people who suffered from a deadly disease.

However, we should pay more attention to the existing problems and allocate more money on solving them for the reason that the demand for solving the existing problems is far greater than  that of studying the long-term ones that might help future generations. Our society is such a fast developing one that many problems will appear at the same time, for example, the unemployment, the poverty, the lack of food supplies, the AIDS, the bird flu and etc., all of which are likely to cause a social earthquake. In terms of the government, if it pays less to solve the present social problems, it will receive the civil resistance, because these problems tend to be more sensitive to the mass.

Moreover, it is undeserving of spending lots of money on a predictive thing which we cannot even make sure whether it will take place, because what we could see clearly is just what has happened rather than what will happen. Comparing two studies, one is about how the solar system will evolve after 4.5 billion years, while the other is about how we can reduce the unemployment, it is no doubt, by an average view, that the latter appears more tough to the citizens and should be operated immediately. In fact, our society is developing step by step, and each step, as far as I concerned, stands for a solution of a present problem.

To sum up, though some long-term studies should be done since they might have a profound effect in the human being’s future, more proportion of the definite money that can be allocated should be spent on the immediate and existing social problems.

napUID: 196976

ISSUE3
"It is more important toallocate money for immediate, existing social problems than to spend iton long-term research that might help future generations."

I fundamentally agree withthe speaker that to allocate money for immediate, existing socialproblems is more important than to spend it on long-lerm research thatmight help future generations.(感觉这么说就完全否定第2段了，给点余地吧)

It is true that thegovernment should pay for some long-term studies, which our futuregenerations could benefit from. These studies should be focus on eithersome significant themes(感觉比太合适，换个别的吧，例如project, study) of our lives and societies, includingenvironmental protection, space exploitation, resource saving and so onor some successive research in scientific fields like physics,chemistry, biology, astronomy and etc. Some of the problems which arenot so serious today, may become too severe to survive(Problem survive?) from in thefuture. Therefore, it is too late for us to reach the moment that(是不是when?) thesituation could not be saved any more. For example, although thepopulation can be contained by the earth, there might be some day thatno more room for another person to stand on the ground, so we shouldtry to establish a space station from now on. And also, some researchin physics, chemistry and biology may seem to be useless right now, butperhaps they will play an important role in future development ofmedicine and survive a great numbers of people who suffered from adeadly disease.(这两个例子行)

However, we should pay moreattention to the existing problems and allocate more money on solvingthem for the reason that the demand for solving the existing problemsis far greater than  that of studying the long-term ones that mighthelp future generations(感觉主题句太长了，我一遍没反应过来，不知道老美会怎么想). Our society is such a fast developing one thatmany problems will appear at the same time, for example, theunemployment, the poverty, the lack of food supplies, the AIDS, thebird flu and etc., all of which are likely to cause a socialearthquake. In terms of the government, if it pays less to solve thepresent social problems, it will receive the civil resistance, becausethese problems tend to be more sensitive to the mass.

Moreover, it is undeservingof spending lots of money on a predictive thing which we cannot evenmake sure whether it will take place, because what we could see clearlyis just what has happened rather than what will happen. Comparing twostudies, one is about how the solar system will evolve after 4.5billion years, while the other is about how we can reduce theunemployment, it is no doubt, by an average view, that the latterappears more tough to the citizens and should be operated immediately(说不出什么问题，就是感觉例子论证有点怪，LZ自己看一下吧).In fact, our society is developing step by step, and each step, as faras I concerned, stands for a solution of a present problem.
(感觉最好在这两段的主题句上突出说明两段的关系)

To sum up, though somelong-term studies should be done since they might have a profoundeffect in the human being’s future(就是这句，我感觉最好在第一段声明一下), more proportion of the definitemoney that can be allocated should be spent on the immediate andexisting social problems.

这篇还行嘛，我感觉在没有感觉的时候能这么写就很好了，很有结构

hezhifei2008UID: 2233976

ISSUE3
"It is more important to allocate money for immediate, existing social problems than to spend it on long-term research that might help future generations."

I fundamentally agree with the speaker that to allocate money for immediate, existing social problems is more important than to spend it on long-lerm research that might help future generations.开头段短了点吧，看起来有点干巴，而且也没给第一段留点存在的理由

It is true that the government should pay for some long-term studies, which our future generations could benefit from. These studies should be focus on either some significant themes of our lives and societies, including environmental protection, space exploitation, resource saving and so on or some successive research in scientific fields like physics, chemistry, biology, astronomy and etc. Some of the problems which are not so serious today, may become too severe to survive from in the future. Therefore, it is too late for us to reach the moment that the situation could not be saved any more. For example, although the population can be contained by the earth, there might be some day that no more room for another person to stand on the ground, so we should try to establish a space station from now on.我觉得这个例子不太恰当，开发空间站目前的主要目的好像不是为了人多没处住吧，就算是也太遥远可变性太大，说服力不强 And also, some research in physics, chemistry and biology may seem to be useless right now, but perhaps they will play an important role in future development of medicine and survive a great numbers of people who suffered from a deadly disease.个人认为这个例子也不太恰当，个人理解像医学这样的学科如果被认可是很快能被开发出用途的，不同于理论物理这样的东西

However, we should pay more attention to the existing problems and allocate more money on solving them for the reason that the demand for solving the existing problems is far greater than  that of studying the long-term ones that might help future generations. Our society is such a fast developing one that many problems will appear at the same time, for example换such as 或其他的吧，这个用过了，挺明显的, the unemployment, the poverty, the lack of food supplies, the AIDS, the bird flu and etc., all of which are likely to cause a social earthquake. In terms of the government, if it pays less to solve the present social problems, it will receive the civil resistance, because these problems tend to be more sensitive to the mass.

Moreover, it is undeserving of spending lots of money on a predictive thing which we cannot even make sure whether it will take place, because what we could see clearly is just what has happened rather than what will happen. Comparing two studies, one is about how the solar system will evolve after 4.5 billion years, while the other is about how we can reduce the unemployment, it is no doubt, by an average view, that the latter appears more tough to the citizens and should be operated immediately.这个例子有点夸张吧 In fact, our society is developing step by step, and each step, as far as I concerned, stands for a solution of a present problem.

To sum up, though some long-term studies should be done since they might have a profound effect in the human being’s future, more proportion of the definite money that can be allocated should be spent on the immediate and existing social problems.结尾也再丰满一下吧