- 最后登录
- 2010-3-14
- 在线时间
- 22 小时
- 寄托币
- 541
- 声望
- 0
- 注册时间
- 2007-2-13
- 阅读权限
- 20
- 帖子
- 1
- 精华
- 0
- 积分
- 459
- UID
- 2303982
 
- 声望
- 0
- 寄托币
- 541
- 注册时间
- 2007-2-13
- 精华
- 0
- 帖子
- 1
|
No field of study can advance significantly unless outsiders bring their knowledge and experience to that field of study.
Whether all field of study cannot develop significantly without outsiders bring their knowledge and experience to that area of the study? It is undeniable that miscellaneous discipline advanced with quite a few other fields, however, in my observation, not all disciplines necessitate outsiders to bring their information.
Indeed, knowledge and experience in other fields play a vital role in the progress and success of a myriad of areas of study. For supporting example, one needs look no further than the computer science, which has only history of few decades. Notwithstanding, it has become one of the most discipline in the world, by which obtain convenience for both society and individuals. On the one hand, it based on the theory of the Mathematics, especially lineage algebra, and probability statistic. Matrix is the fundamental element in program, while many other algorithms cannot work without those methods in mathematics. On the other hand, the rapid development of the hardware is primarily rests on the electronics and physics, research of which provide the increasingly-developed integrated circuit. Thus, both the software and hardware in computer science constantly obtain breakthrough due to knowledge and experience of other areas of study.
However, not all fields of study demand the assistance of other discipline for their own distinctive. Consider those theoretical disciplines for example. Philosophy, the fundamental discipline of a sea of other areas of study, sprang from and developed by the perspective of human beings, instead of knowledge and experience outsiders bring in. Since the ancient time, our ancestor have immersed in pondering and probing the truth of the world. So abstract and abstruse the field is that hardly can other subject serve as catalyst for it. Another case in point is that the theoretical physics. Dose the relative theory come out without the help of other disciplines? It is fantastic imagination and intelligence, adding to the classic laws in the physics that enable the brilliant theory to emerge. Accordingly, reflecting quite a few fields of study actually achieve accomplishment by their own, it is not sagacious to say all areas of study need outside knowledge.
It is of profound significance for us to strike in balance between knowledge in the areas of study and that of outsiders. It is unquestionable that, in most cases, the experts in the certain fields devote themselves to the area and thus those achievements in the fields can be secured. We cannot neglect the contribution they did to the success of the fields, while considering significance outsiders bring. In my own perspective, the ones who specialized in the given area of study are urged to constantly dedicate themselves in the fields and utilize the knowledge outsiders bring. For instance, architects currently may design by the Computer Auxiliary Design (CAD), in way that draw more quickly and accurately. Thus, calling for a balance in the knowledge of the area and that of outsiders will mutually benefit the areas of study.
In conclusion, numerous disciplines indeed demand assistance of other fields of study, whereas the expertise in the discipline is the fundamental of its advancement and success. It is of great importance to strike balance between them.
[ 本帖最后由 钢琴宝宝 于 2008-2-2 13:41 编辑 ] |
|