【☆09GRE作文冲刺组】yanxin19 3月1日作文Issue

yanxin19UID: 2254573

Which should the study of history mostly focus on-- The famous, few individual s or the groups of peoples?
The speaker inclines to the latter, I partly agree, the special individual are a part of history and elected, or supported by people, but, we have to concede that our hero or heroine have their special identities from common people.


First, let us analyze the appearance of the famous individuals based on their currently society and historical situations. Once scientific and technology advances, social change always accompanies, then, chances to lead the change or opportunities to do some deal and be famous rise. If a man of a woman have intrinsic
desire to change the society or makes a decision to ultilize the chance, a hero of
heroine may appear. Doubtless, the individual who does not care the outside world and catch the chance will not be famous. Take an legend hero in the British epic Beowolf for example, Danish King Rotherga and his people have suffered from the monster Grandie for decades, they need a man who can save the kingdom from hardship, so a alien prince comes to Denmark with his 10 strong attendants, debate Grandi and even Gandils' mother and a dragon subsequently.

In addition, there are situations common people
strive for freedom and development themselves against the government and the upper-class, despite that in many conditions history and the societies need special individual to lead them, when their enemies inhibit them. In 16th century France, the country is divided to three classes, priests and nobles are both two upper-classes, while civialians, farmers and novel capitalists are totally the third class, who take up the majority of the gross population and inhibited from many rights and precedence(priority). Louis 16th, the feudal King, does not care the development of the productivity force at all. All above resulted the France Revolution, which is hold by Paris civialians, they liberate politic prisoners, and upset the kingdom. There are not fixed leader in France Revolution--from ,丹东 to B. Napoleon. No doubt, people is the main force in this great revolution.

however, there are other variables? should be right. mostly, it is necessary for the special individual to have some specific identities or skills, for instance, I n politic fields, charm and charisma are crucial. Beowolf and B. Napoleon have such skills, In other fields, inventors, for example, T. Edison have spirit to consist on trying errors, or consider scientific researchers, talent and willpower are also crucial.


In a word, the history always need some specific individuals to change the society, but without such a hero or heroine, change will also happens, even with another leader or leaded by the civilians themselves. However, it does not mean that everyone could be the leader of history, many identities such as talent an willpower are required.

ratoUID: 2563435

他們米有安排我們的3月1
我們互改好不好
我是126樓的rato