Issue13@@ A Dream@@ 小组第一次作业 by optionhj

optionhjUID: 2639105

Many of the world's lesser-known languages are being lost as fewer and fewer people speak them due to the worldwide use of some special so-called general language such as English, France. While the international communication needs some kinds of uniform language to move away the language barrier, however, I agree with the author that action should be taken to protect the minor language from vanishing out from the world.

First of all, the procedure of internationalization needs a general used language which can be spoken as a uniform language for different nations all around the world. Today, to keep up with the high speeds of widespread of high-technology, and global mobility, people have and need much more opportunities to talk to different people around all corner of the whole world. Particularly, the introducing and widespread using of Internet serves the possibility for contacting between two entirely different people even on the opposite side of the earth. While the only problem left for dealing with is language- a language that all people on the earth can use to communicate each other.

Furthermore, speaking same language helps people to build a good, trustful relationship as well as understand each other. Misunderstanding always leads to suspicion, then leads to hostility, at last evolves into conflicts and wars. thereby, misunderstanding always comes into being when those two meet with each other- a fight is unavoidable as a result. As we know, many wars today broke out between different nations, because they have different language, different religion, and different ideas to some mutual affairs. Had we had a more intimate relationship between each nation by more communication, we would like to save a lot more conflicts and wars around the world.

However, using a universal-used language for communication does not necessarily mean abandon of other lesser used languages. A language identifies a special nation or country, of which there are certain kinds of customs, mores, culture, traditions and civilization. Wiping out a language means losing a mass of culture, arts, knowledge of a nation or country which has long time history and a great deal of accumulation. One might argues that language is only a tool for communication and a universal culture also can do in the world. Yet consider why we have to appeal to save the species which are threatened to be extinct in future. Because we need diversity in the world, and we could not, and dare not to, imagine how it would be if there was only one kind of species-even suppose humankind-left on the earth.

In sum, I agree with the author that we should take steps to prevent our any language from becoming extinct which fewer and fewer people speak. While at the same time, I suggest that we should take a popular language that is worldwide used for communication, which can provide more convenience for communication to each other, accelerate the procedure of internationalization, and then do our human kind a great favor .

kenteUID: 2597633

首先，本文开始表明了自己的立场，然后退一步论证统一化语言的好处，接着反过来说这和语言的多样性不排斥，最后总结，说明既要维持语言的多样化，也要推广一种全球性的语言来交流。。
应该说，文章的逻辑部分很不错，论证严密，语言流畅，当然有一些小错误，估计是打字失误。
另外，对于文章的内容安排，如果根据作者的思路，论点中维持语言多样化这方面应该更重一点，作者似乎应该投入更多的笔力，当然这只是拙见，我只是觉得这样全文看上去更为平衡。

更细的地方，讨论时再说吧，我最近两天考试，所以积了很多作业，不好意思不能尽力了