[TSUBASA] 第二次作业 argument188 by cnwzly

cnwzlyUID：2634423

TOPIC: ARGUMENT188 - A new report suggests that men and women experience pain very differently from one another, and that doctors should consider these differences when prescribing pain medications. When researchers administered the same dosage of kappa opioids-a painkiller-to 28 men and 20 women who were having their wisdom teeth extracted, the women reported feeling much less pain than the men, and the easing of pain lasted considerably longer in women. This research suggests that kappa opioids should be prescribed for women whenever pain medication is required, whereas men should be given other kinds of pain medication. In addition, researchers should reevaluate the effects of all medications on men versus women.

In this argument, the author advocates the recommendation that the variety of treatment between men and women who are suffering from pain is apparent, and what is more is that the effects of all medications which is not as on male as on female should be assessed. To justify this assertion, the author provides the evidence that participants involved in a research have a dissimilar reaction between men and women. Although the argument seems to be convincible at first glance, it has several logic flaws that undermine the line of reasoning.

To begin with, it is a fallacy to draw a conclusion while whether experiencing pain between male and female is various is still unclear. Since the number of the group who takes part in the study is too small to assess the exactitude of the research. In all likelihood, however, the participants' reactions do not represent the collective responses of all the patients. And there obviously are numerous other factors like environmental, mental, physical influence, which are needed primarily concerned but neglected during the medical test. Hence, the author cannot confidently draw any general conclusion about all such sufferers.

Even if the diversity of the certain medical effects on men and women exist, it is nevertheless unfair to infer that all the medications have the phenomena as the medicine of kappa opioids.
The author assumes that the result of research of various reactions of kappa opioids between men and women applies equally to all the medicine, so that it is essential to revaluate them. It is very likely that the effects of kappa opioids are special even unique comparing with other medicine, while other medicines have the same response among the patients. Without ruling out such possibility, the author cannot justifiably conclude that there is necessity to revaluate all of the medicines.

Furthermore, the mere fact the men feel more pain than the women in the study is insufficient evidence of necessity that other medicine should be prescribed except kappa opioids while men get the pain. While causality relies on strong evidence, in itself it is not sufficient. The author must also account for all other possible factors leading to substantiating that there are actually no effects on smooth pain during the treatment. However, the study indicates that the aspects of easing of pain for men just endure not as well as women. In some respects, it is possible that such the medicine is an especially good medicine since its low side-effect. Lacking evidence to the contrary, the author cannot justifiably conclude that a suggestion given by research is reasonable.

In conclusion, though the argument seems to be plausible, in fact, the recommendation relies on certain assumptions that render it unconvincing as it stands. Not only does it leave out such key issue, but also cites in the analysis the evidence, which does not lend strong support to what author claims. To bolster the recommendation, the author has to provide clearer statistical evidence about whether all the medicines have the various effects on between men and women. To better evaluate the recommendation, I would like to know more specifics to demonstrate why the medicine has the different effects.

wildrose800331UID：2602131

In this argument, the author advocates the recommendation that the variety of treatment between men and women who are suffering from pain is apparent, and what is more个人觉得这不是建议啊　貌似在这里不合适 is that the effects of all medications which is not as on male as on female should be assessed. To justify this assertion, the author provides the evidence that participants involved in a research have a dissimilar(unsimilar) reaction between men and women. Although the argument seems to be convincible at first glance, it has several logic flaws that undermine the line of reasoning.

To begin with, it is a fallacy to draw a conclusion while the deduction whether experiencing pain between male and female is various is still unclear. Since the number of the group who takes (take) part in the study is too small to assess the exactitude of the research. In all likelihood, however, the participants' reactions do not represent the collective responses of all the patients. And there obviously are numerous other factors like environmental, mental, physical influence, which are needed primarily concerned but actually neglected during the medical test.这句很强 Hence, the author cannot confidently draw any general conclusion about all such sufferers.

Even if the diversity of the certain medical effects on men and women exists (exist), it is nevertheless unfair to infer that all the medications have the phenomena as the medicine of kappa opioids.
The author assumes that the result of research of various reactions of kappa opioids between men and women applies equally to all the medicine, so that it is essential to revalue (revaluate)  them. It is very likely that the effects of kappa opioids are special even unique comparing with other medicine, while other medicines have the same response among the patients. Without ruling out such possibility, the author cannot justifiably conclude that there is necessity to revaluate all of the medicines.

Furthermore, the mere fact the men feel more pain than the women in the study is an insufficient evidence of necessity that other medicine should be prescribed except kappa opioids while men get the pain. While causality relies on strong evidence, in itself it is not sufficient. The author must also account for all other possible factors leading to substantiating that there are actually no effects on smoothening (smooth) pain during the treatment. However, the study indicates that the aspects of easing of pain for men just endure not as well as women. In some respects, it is possible that such the medicine is an especially good medicine since its low side-effect. Lacking evidence to the contrary, the author cannot justifiably换个词吧　equally, confidently conclude that a suggestion given by research is reasonable.

In conclusion, though the argument seems to be plausible这句喜欢, in fact, the recommendation relies on certain assumptions that render it unconvincing as it stands. Not only does it leave out such key issues (issue), but also cites in the analysis the evidence, which does not lend strong support to what author claims. To bolster the recommendation, the author has to provide clearer statistical evidence about whether all the medicines have the various effects on between men and women. To better evaluate the recommendation, I would like to know more specifics to demonstrate why the medicine has the different effects.
大体推理很好啊　论据也充分

cnwzlyUID：2634423

In this argument, the author advocates the conclusion that the variety of treatment between men and women who are suffering from pain is apparent, and what is more is that the effects of all medications which is not as on male as on female should be assessed. To justify this assertion, the author provides the evidence that participants involved in a research have a dissimilar reaction between men and women. Although the argument seems to be convincible at first glance, it has several logic flaws that undermine the line of reasoning.

To begin with, it is a fallacy to draw a conclusion while the deduction whether experiencing pain between male and female is various is still unclear. Since the number of the group who take part in the study is too small to assess the exactitude of the research. In all likelihood, however, the participants' reactions do not represent the collective responses of all the patients. And there obviously are numerous other factors like environmental, mental, physical influence, which are needed primarily concerned but actually neglected during the medical test. Hence, the author cannot confidently draw any general conclusion about all such sufferers.

Even if the diversity of the certain medical effects on men and women exist, it is nevertheless unfair to infer that all the medications have the phenomena as the medicine of kappa opioids.
The author assumes that the result of research of various reactions of kappa opioids between men and women applies equally to all the medicine, so that it is essential to revaluate  them. It is very likely that the effects of kappa opioids are special even unique comparing with other medicine, while other medicines have the same response among the patients. Without ruling out such possibility, the author cannot justifiably conclude that there is necessity to revaluate all of the medicines.

Furthermore, the mere fact the men feel more pain than the women in the study is an insufficient evidence of necessity that other medicine should be prescribed except kappa opioids while men get the pain. While causality relies on strong evidence, in itself it is not sufficient. The author must also account for all other possible factors leading to substantiating that there are actually no effects on smoothing pain during the treatment. However, the study indicates that the aspects of easing of pain for men just endure not as well as women. In some respects, it is possible that such the medicine is an especially good medicine since its low side-effect. Lacking evidence to the contrary, the author cannot confidently conclude that a suggestion given by research is reasonable.

In conclusion, though the argument seems to be plausible这句喜欢, in fact, the recommendation relies on certain assumptions that render it unconvincing as it stands. Not only does it leave out such key issue, but also cites in the analysis the evidence, which does not lend strong support to what author claims. To bolster the recommendation, the author has to provide clearer statistical evidence about whether all the medicines have the various effects on between men and women. To better evaluate the recommendation, I would like to know more specifics to demonstrate why the medicine has the different effects.