【辉太郎杀G大队】7/10 作业by hdsf2003

hdsf2003UID: 2351462

Issue 31

"Money spent on research is almost always a good investment, even when the results of that research are controversial."


I agree with the view that it is a right choice to invest money on research. Since we know it is a controversial research in advance, the investment should be cancelled.

People become more intelligent than ever before when taking about how to invest. A good program hardly fails to attract the attention of countless investors. So far, research can be such a worthy investment. First of all, many high-tech companies have established in recent years and offered our customers convenient and comfortable life. This is the output of some excellent research work. Secondly, the risk of putting money on research is lower than other programs. Many people run into rapture at the mere mention of investing real estate. But few of them actually do that for they cannot make sure a positive return. This is also the case of various other programs such as petroleum and cars. Maybe most of us have learnt the fact that there was an obvious fluctuation of raw oil price last year. It seems that few programs cannot be influenced by the global economic slow down. Here, if you are keen on the political guide on research, you will find that new scientific program like solar power research can be a good choice to invest. Of course, other research programs can be your alternative choice. You will benefit from research with a much lower risk.

On the other hand, we never deny the possibility that you will lose money on a controversial research. If the research itself contains no scientific value or commercial value, you'd better take a prudent decision when you give money. If the program is against the laws or regulars, you also have to draw your money back in time. Furthermore, there are many research programs which are very critical for long term development. It is not the best bet to invest too much money on a endless research for you cannot get your money back before you leave the world, let alone the return. Some research about the art and literature may be of great value to artists and writers or readers, but for most common people, there is no necessary to invest for they should be supported by government or some patron or private funding.

In sum, for people who still have much money in hand can allocate it to some valuable research for its lower risk, but it is not recommended to invest some controversial research programs.


Argument 162

The arguer gives a conclusion that regularly eating soy can prevent fatigue and depression. He comes to this statement from a study that people in Asia eat 20 grams of soy while North Americans nearly eat none. He also mentions the isoflavones in soy which has an effect of disease-preventing. At the first glance, it seems true that soy helps to cure chronic fatigue and depression. In fact, there are several flaws in his statement.

To start with, arguer fails to tell us detailed information of distribution of these two diseases and soy consumption in Asia. Though the disease rates in North America are much higher than Asia on average, but in local places, the rates may be lower. Perhaps in these local places of Asia, the soy consumption takes up an amazing percentage but they suffer more chronic diseases. Or some people in Asia who do not eat soy but suffer less diseases. Therefore, it is totally doubtful that soy help to prevent diseases.

In addition, there is no correlation between isoflavones and chronic fatigue and depression. Though the arguer gives a study result that isoflavones possess disease-preventing properties, he doesn't rule out the possibility that isoflavones cannot prevent chronic fatigue and depression.

Finally, even if isoflavones can take effect to prevent fatigue and depression for Asians, it may lose its effect for North Americans. People in different area have different body structures and their immunity system may be not the same. Even perhaps this chemical takes no effect to help prevent any disease for North Americans. It is reasonable for us to have this suspicion.

To sum up, the arguer proposes a method to prevent chronic fatigue and depression though an analysis of a study. But he cannot convince us unless he brings more information about the concrete disease rate distribution and responding soy consumption in Asia and more evidence that isoflavones does prevent these two diseases and takes effect both for Asians and North Americans.

sindyttUID: 2661721

"Money spent on research is almost always a good investment, even when the results of that research are controversial."


I agree with the view that it is a right choice to invest money on research. Since we know it is a controversial research in advance, the investment should be cancelled.（开篇简洁哈。但没有任何铺贴，观点显得绝对，生硬了点。）

People become more intelligent than ever before when taking about how to invest. A good program hardly fails to attract the attention of countless investors. So far, （这个迄今，有点莫名）research can be such a worthy investment. First of all, many high-tech companies have been ?established in recent years and offered our customers convenient and comfortable life. This is the output of some excellent research work. Secondly, the risk of putting money on research is lower than other programs. Many people run into rapture at the mere mention of investing real estate(好表达). But few of them actually do that for they cannot make sure a positive return. This is also the case of various other programs such as petroleum and cars. Maybe most of us have learnt the fact that there was an obvious fluctuation of raw oil price last year. It seems that few programs cannot be influenced by the global economic slow down. Here, if you are keen on the political guide on research, you will find that new scientific program like solar power research can be a good choice to invest. Of course, other research programs can be your alternative choice. You will benefit from research with a much lower risk. （Secondly 这个理由值得商榷，其它的有风险，不代表投资研究风险就低，论据感觉不足）

On the other hand, we never deny the possibility that you will lose money on a controversial research. If the research itself contains no scientific value or commercial value, you'd better take a prudent decision when you give money. If the program is against the laws or regulars, you also have to draw your money back in time. Furthermore, there are many research programs which are very critical for long term development. It is not the best bet to invest too much money on a endless research for you cannot get your money back before you leave the world, let alone the return. Some research about the art and literature may be of great value to artists and writers or readers, but for most common people, there is no necessary to invest for they should be supported by government or some patron or private funding.（论证感觉过分局限在具体的投资回报率了。）


In sum, for people who still have much money in hand can allocate it to some valuable research for its lower risk, but it is not recommended to invest some controversial research programs.
评语：感觉审题有一点狭隘了，过分关注了具体的投资和利润回收问题。事实上，研究带来的知识，科技和社会进步才是真正的利润。应该往大的方面扩展。建议看下范文的观点。

Argument 162

The arguer gives a conclusion that regularly eating soy can prevent fatigue and depression. He comes to this statement from a study that people in Asia eat 20 grams of soy while North Americans nearly eat none. He also mentions the isoflavones in soy which has an effect of disease-preventing. At the first glance, it seems true that soy helps to cure chronic fatigue and depression. In fact, there are several flaws in his statement. （开头很有模板风格，很好，正是我们所需要练成的。）

To start with, arguer fails to tell us detailed information of distribution of these two diseases and soy consumption in Asia. Though the disease rates in North America are much higher than Asia on average, but in local places, the rates may be lower. Perhaps in these local places of Asia, the soy consumption takes up an amazing percentage but they suffer more chronic diseases. Or some people in Asia who do not eat soy but suffer less diseases. Therefore, it is totally doubtful that soy help to prevent diseases.

In addition, there is no correlation between isoflavones and chronic fatigue and depression. Though the arguer gives a study result that isoflavones possess disease-preventing properties, he doesn't rule out the possibility that isoflavones cannot prevent chronic fatigue and depression. （短了些哈这段）

Finally, even if isoflavones can take effect to prevent fatigue and depression for Asians, it may lose its effect for North Americans. People in different area have different body structures and their immunity system may be not the same. Even perhaps this chemical takes no effect to help prevent any disease for North Americans. It is reasonable for us to have this suspicion （感觉作者的观点有新意，但是应该参考下参考书和范文，把逻辑弱点描述的抽象一点）.

To sum up, the arguer proposes a method to prevent chronic fatigue and depression though an analysis of a study. But he cannot convince us unless he brings more information about the concrete disease rate distribution and responding soy consumption in Asia and more evidence that isoflavones does prevent these two diseases and takes effect both for Asians and North Americans.
评语：Arguement有模板参考，搞清逻辑点后，关键是短时间够字数或多一点，所以大家一起加油哈。
P.S Sindytt今天出去回来晚了，拙见来自MC dragonfly。共勉共勉。