- 最后登录
- 2004-8-28
- 在线时间
- 0 小时
- 寄托币
- 950
- 声望
- 0
- 注册时间
- 2003-3-6
- 阅读权限
- 15
- 帖子
- 2
- 精华
- 0
- 积分
- 276
- UID
- 127722
- 声望
- 0
- 寄托币
- 950
- 注册时间
- 2003-3-6
- 精华
- 0
- 帖子
- 2
|
Can one's politics be identified through a short-time contact by others? I do not agree with such an assertion that everything about people reflects their political beliefs so I will give out a negative answer to the question at thebeginning, although there really exist some special examples which can reach this point. can one's politics be identified through a short-time contact by others? The author in the statement argues that it is possible because everything about people reflects their political beliefs. In my view, however, the answer to this question is "no" except in few situations.
What we could not deny is the fact that under some circumstance, it is possible to identify others' politics quickly by observing the details of them specific things-- their clothes, their friends, the way they talk, and what they eat. In some countries and regions with the unification of church and state, somebody's politics can be justified at the first glance when his/her eating taboos are noticed,. fFor instance, an Arabism people with his/her taboo of consuming pork. In arabian countries most of people are prohibited to eat pork. On the other hand,表示转折,这里只是并列的意思吧 in some special historical era, people were willing to present their politics by wearing different clothes, such as the famous feminism forerunners "Blue Stocking" in England history, who were all wearing blue stockings as they were called. However, though to identify one's politics hurry is feasible under some situations, it cannot be acted on general circumstance.这句去掉,下面可以带一下On the one hand ...,On the other hand...两者所列举的是具有相反或相对关系的事物。他们所反映的是转折关系。
In general circumstance, as a common sense, a very-short-time meeting can only provide people a correspondingly facial impression about others, which is usually not strong enough to justify their politics inside. Except in few situations as metioned in the above, generally speaking, a short-time meeting can only give us a rather superficial impression and that cannot offer us an understanding of others' political beliefs in their deep inside. Such fast cognition has to stay on the facet of their clothes, their friends, the way they talk and what they eat. On one hand, such symbols show others the culture they are growing in rather than their politics. Cited as an example, Chinese are accustomed to use chopsticks when they are eating, compared with the Westerns using knives and forks. And similarly, many African females living in primary tribes always bare their up body, which is regarded asbizarre in any enlightened society. Such differences are easily noticed after a short time of meeting, but they really show nothing (linked with)about those people's politics.
On the other hand, the impression in a short time sometimes represents people's characteristics much more than their politics, too. One cannot draw such a conclusion -- the two people respectively from USA and Japan have the same political point of view to support the war in Iraq -- just when he/she has seen them chatting with the same language, same body gestures, or wearing in the similar Hip-hop style. Another great example will be presented here: could notorious Hitler has friends who were not linked so closely with Nazi? Hofmann was one of them. As a photographer, he had the same interest with Hitler, who was not only an autocrat but also an outstanding artist. In conclusion, a short-time impression can only offer a shallow cognition, which is not keen enough to show one's politics.
On contrast,By contrast one's political beliefs as a kind of profound feeling needs long-time meeting to be known well, since it cannot be reflected by everything about him/her. People should spend long time to observe one's inclination on politics,in observing political inclination and analyze his/her every choice on his/her political way, analyzing his/her manifestation and stance in political respect and so can people tell the skin-deep cognitions from his/her real political beliefs.thus reach a comprehensive conclusion about political beliefs. For example, even though one of your neighbors claims that he is an honest supporter of Republican, how can you recognize that is it only a joke if you have not seen his voting to the Democrat candidate? Here goes a significant Chinese saying, "Time reveals a person's heart", which can be a summarization of my opinion here. good sentences
To sum, it is usually impossible to know one's political beliefs in a very short time meeting, because not every thing of him/her is reflecting his/her politics so clearly. Politics as a deep belief is kept inside of people,in people's mind which needs a long-term cognition process. and knowing that is a long-time process.(615words)
总之,这片文章逻辑不错,但是就是觉得对于political beliefs没有具体化,老是在外围转没有深刻的分析 |
|