issue160. 欢迎批评啊

青蛙过河UID: 153167

issue160. the most essential qulity of an effective leader is the ability to remain consistently committed to particular principles and objectives. Any leader who is quickly and easily influenced by shifts in popular opinion will accomplish little.
,提纲如下
    1开头
    2领导应该坚持自己的原则和目标
    3领导不坚持自己的原则,就容易导致失败
    4过分坚持原则的危害1-独裁不利于长期发展
    5过分坚持原则的危害2-个人利益受损
    6结尾



       Leadership is one of the key words of our time. An effective leadership calls for a balance in which there are both commitment to personal objectives and principles and yielding to popuolar will.
       when it comes to a leader, no matter in political, bussiness, or other realms, i would admit that strict adherence to principles and objectives is the prerequisite for an effective leadership. Few would disagree that through their ability to inspire others and lift the human spirit Mahatma Gandhi and Martin Luther King were eminently effective in leading others to effect social change through civil disobedience. It seems to me that both of their leadership, in order to be effective, inherently requires that they remain steadfastly committed to principle in no fear of others' opinion. Obviously, It is commitment to principle that  is the inspiration that render them to be effecitive.
        simplely put, without inadherence to his or her principle, a leader would ruin the opportunity to accomplish.For example, had Gandhi advocated civil disobedience yet been persuaded by close advisors that an occasional violent protest might be effective in gaining India's independence from Britain, mo doubt the result would have been immediate forfeiture of that leadership. In a word, a leader must not be a hypocrite; otherwise, they will lose all followers and effectivenesss.
        Admittedly, some level of commitment to principle is needed to perform leadership. By the same token, however, over inadherence to principles and totally ignoring the popular will result in a series of problems. The first has to do with the enduring development. Consider history's most infamous tyrants and despots-such as Hitler, Genghis Khan and Stalin. No historian would disagree that these individuals were remarkably effective leaders, and that each one remained consistently committe to his tyrannical objectives and Machiavellian principles. Ironically, it was stubborn adherence to objectives that ultimately defeated all except Khan. Thus, in the short term, stubborn commitment to one's objectives might serve a leader's interest in preserving his or her power; yet, in the long term such behavior invariably results in that leader's downfall-if the principles are not in accord with those of the leader's followers.
      The second  has to do with self-interest. Leadership is a business born not only of idealism but also of pragmatism-insofa as in order to be effective a leader must gain and hold onto power. Consider this aspect of self-interest0, some degree of pandering to the electorate and to those who might lend financial support for reelection efforts is necessary to maintain that position. In a democratic society, Without compromising to popular will, one could not become a leader at all, to say nothing of adherence to principle.
      To sum up, a effective leader should commit to his or her principles and objectives in order to creat prosperities. At the same time, given long term development and self-interest a leader is forced to strike a balance in whether committing to her or his principles and objectives or pandering to popular will.

dezhiUID: 156141

Leadership is one of the key words of our time. An effective leadership calls for a balance in which there are both commitment to personal objectives and principles and yielding to popuolar[拼写错误] will.[开头简单明了，不错]

when it comes to a leader, no matter in political, bussiness [又是拼写错误], or other realms, i [->I] would admit that strict adherence to principles and objectives is the prerequisite for an effective leadership. Few would disagree that through their ability to inspire others and lift the human spirit Mahatma Gandhi and Martin Luther King were eminently effective in leading others to effect[你想用affect吗？] social change through civil disobedience[这句话前一个through后一个through，是否有些别扭？].[我觉得这个例子并不恰当，这里你谈到了两个人，却连一个人都没说清楚；他们怎么effective了？哪里可以看出他们remain consistently committed to particular principles and objectives？为什么这是prerequisite for an effective leadership ?要扣住中心多分析分析才好] It seems to me that both of their leadership, in order to be effective, inherently requires that they remain steadfastly committed to principle in no fear of others' opinion. Obviously, It is commitment to principle that is the inspiration that render them to be effecitive.[拼写错误]

dezhiUID: 156141

请注意发文格式，各个段落之间空一行
另外，写完之后肯定没有检查检查吧，很多拼写错误哦，发文之前先放到WORD里面看看再说

青蛙过河UID: 153167

太匆忙了，下次一定改正